Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Chinese takes more brain power?

  Tags: Brain | Mandarin
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
32 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3
lindseylbb
Bilingual Triglot
Groupie
ChinaRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4933 days ago

92 posts - 126 votes 
Speaks: Mandarin*, Cantonese*, English
Studies: Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 25 of 32
08 March 2012 at 5:05pm | IP Logged 
Longer than "half" that if counted from chin but shorten than that if remove those "ununited" in between. I was thinking about the invention of characters when I typed that......Sorry for that. From my limited history knowledge, I want to point out that even in those ununited time, union was a eternal dream. they just lack of capacity to do that.

Edited by lindseylbb on 08 March 2012 at 5:44pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6583 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 26 of 32
08 March 2012 at 8:10pm | IP Logged 
^ But before the Qin, the writing system wasn't unified. Qin Shihuang standardized the writing system of all his
conquered territories by burning all the books written in the wrong characters and killing all the scholars who took
issue with that.
4 persons have voted this message useful



HenryMW
Tetraglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5175 days ago

125 posts - 179 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, French
Studies: Modern Hebrew

 
 Message 27 of 32
08 March 2012 at 11:18pm | IP Logged 
Wow. That's such a big loss. Did they at least keep the old characters around for
historical purposes?

Edited by HenryMW on 09 March 2012 at 12:01am

1 person has voted this message useful



egill
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5697 days ago

418 posts - 791 votes 
Speaks: Mandarin, English*
Studies: German, Spanish, Dutch

 
 Message 28 of 32
09 March 2012 at 1:10am | IP Logged 
HenryMW wrote:
Wow. That's such a big loss. Did they at least keep the old characters around for
historical purposes?


I don't know how common they are, but there are of course archæological remains—most notably:
Sword of Guojian
1 person has voted this message useful



lindseylbb
Bilingual Triglot
Groupie
ChinaRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4933 days ago

92 posts - 126 votes 
Speaks: Mandarin*, Cantonese*, English
Studies: Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 29 of 32
09 March 2012 at 5:47am | IP Logged 
Do better search, Ari. First, 书同文(union of script)and 焚书坑儒(burn books of different philosophies, while having copies in the government, and bury fellows of confucian ) were two different things, with different purpose and different actions. Second, there are debates on whenand how exactly 书同文 occured.
I should have said it's the dependence on characters which conbine largely with meanings, instead of phonics made us together. Chinese speeches, as you may know, vary a lot. So there are talks that how to define languages and dialects should be different because westerners dont understand how our system works and their system doesn't fit us etc etc. Not my opinion.
1 person has voted this message useful



JasonYin
Newbie
China
Joined 4645 days ago

3 posts - 4 votes

 
 Message 30 of 32
09 March 2012 at 9:14am | IP Logged 
haha maybe
2 persons have voted this message useful



nway
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/Vic
Joined 5416 days ago

574 posts - 1707 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 31 of 32
09 March 2012 at 4:52pm | IP Logged 
lindseylbb wrote:
westerners dont understand how our system works

I'm pretty sure there are quite a few Westerners who do. It's not some "mystery" to Western Sinologists.

lindseylbb wrote:
and their system doesn't fit us etc etc. Not my opinion.

The concept of an alphabetic system is not "Western", unless you consider Korea, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Pakistan, Iran, and the Arab world to be part of the "West".
1 person has voted this message useful



LaughingChimp
Senior Member
Czech Republic
Joined 4700 days ago

346 posts - 594 votes 
Speaks: Czech*

 
 Message 32 of 32
13 March 2012 at 1:02am | IP Logged 
lindseylbb wrote:
I should have said it's the dependence on characters which conbine largely with meanings, instead of phonics made us together. Chinese speeches, as you may know, vary a lot. So there are talks that how to define languages and dialects should be different because westerners dont understand how our system works and their system doesn't fit us etc etc. Not my opinion.


You still need Mandarin grammar and vocabulary in order to read and write. So you don't have to learn the pronunciation, but otherwise it's not different from learning any other language.
Chinese has many sounds*, but that's nothing that can't be solved, even languages with more sounds use alphabets.

*I dont know how native speakers hear it, but it seems to me that there are more sounds than pinyin letters.

Edited by LaughingChimp on 13 March 2012 at 1:07am



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 32 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 1 2 3

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5000 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.