Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Linguaphone Chinese - 70’s, Review?

 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
16 messages over 2 pages: 1
BobbyE
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5249 days ago

226 posts - 331 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin

 
 Message 9 of 16
22 November 2011 at 2:47am | IP Logged 
Hmmm, Linguaphone states that this course covers the Pekin dialect of Mandarin, which, if
Wiki has steered me in the right direction, is the Beijing dialect unfortunately. Thank
you for that tip Ari, this has definitely changed my mind on which course I'll use. I
think I'll start with Assimil before finding something more thorough. I am kind of tired
of the FSI style of teaching, so I want to try something completely different.
1 person has voted this message useful





newyorkeric
Diglot
Moderator
Singapore
Joined 6381 days ago

1598 posts - 2174 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: Mandarin, Malay
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 10 of 16
22 November 2011 at 5:43am | IP Logged 
The Linguaphone course isn't heavily Beijing centric. I think they just mean that they are going to teach the standard as oppose to Cantonese, for example. Assimil isn't Beijing centric either. Personally, I prefer the Linguaphone actors' accents. I found the actors in Assimil to be irritating after a while. But like I said above they are both solid courses and definitely worth your time. The old Colloquial Chinese is also quite good.

Edited by newyorkeric on 22 November 2011 at 5:47am

1 person has voted this message useful



BobbyE
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5249 days ago

226 posts - 331 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin

 
 Message 11 of 16
22 November 2011 at 6:43am | IP Logged 
Eric, I actually just found out the specific course i'm using is the one from the 1920's, from grammophones. Would you say that it is still useful to me?
1 person has voted this message useful





newyorkeric
Diglot
Moderator
Singapore
Joined 6381 days ago

1598 posts - 2174 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: Mandarin, Malay
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 12 of 16
22 November 2011 at 6:48am | IP Logged 
I would buy Assimil then if I were you. The 1920s course is in traditional characters and IPA. It's not very usable until you want to learn characters.
1 person has voted this message useful



BobbyE
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5249 days ago

226 posts - 331 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin

 
 Message 13 of 16
22 November 2011 at 10:01am | IP Logged 
Thanks Eric, I ordered Assimil. I think anything to get me started before class, and to do outside of class, will give me an advantage. After this term, Mandarin is going to be my main focus, maybe my major if I end up loving it.
1 person has voted this message useful



simonov
Senior Member
Portugal
Joined 5591 days ago

222 posts - 438 votes 
Speaks: English

 
 Message 14 of 16
22 November 2011 at 11:04am | IP Logged 
BobbyE wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has personal experience with the old linguaphone chinese course. Prof. Arguelles used it, but I have my doubts because in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7FztiCcvl0 he speaks some Mandarin, but the two top comments are from Mandarin speakers who cannot understand his spoken word. This casts a lot of doubt on my ambition to learn from linguaphone.

Well, well.
1. I wouldn't believe those 2 native Chinese speakers.
When I was in Beijing, my Chinese was no better than Prof. Arguelles', but I had no trouble getting people to understand me. I had more trouble trying to understand their English!!!

2. Whatever, the Chinese snippet the professor used in his video about scriptorium has nothing whatsoever to do with Linguaphone. It is a sentence taken from Assimil, lesson 50. Which he once showed himself shadowing in one of his YouTube videos. So much for "linguaphone" pronunciation.
1 person has voted this message useful



BobbyE
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5249 days ago

226 posts - 331 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin

 
 Message 15 of 16
22 November 2011 at 7:05pm | IP Logged 
simonov, it's not like I was bashing either the very accomplished Dr. Arguelles nor Linguaphone, just explaining why I was asking this question. I'm obviously posting this because I WANT to use the program. The methodology is really attractive to me. Big time investments deserve research and third-party opinions.

I defend my logic though...
Just because the passage was in Assimil, makes it no different than any written Mandarin found anywhere else, besides perhaps that it's easier or more formal. I think it's flawed to say that a person's learned skill does not at all reflect where he learned that skill. It's just as obviously flawed to say that a person's skill lies 100% in the responsibility of the teacher. Clearly, there is a middle ground, which is why I started this thread.

It's nice to hear about your experience with your Prof.

Edited by BobbyE on 22 November 2011 at 7:12pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



BobbyE
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5249 days ago

226 posts - 331 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin

 
 Message 16 of 16
24 November 2011 at 5:52am | IP Logged 
Sweet. Ordered Assimil chinese with ease yesterday, two-day shipping free as a student on
amazon, received it today actually.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 16 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.