Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

The efficiency of Latin script.

  Tags: Writing System | Latin
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
32 messages over 4 pages: 13 4  Next >>
Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5056 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 9 of 32
12 September 2011 at 7:53am | IP Logged 
nway, the thread is about scripts, not economies and societies. You have already started
an offtop in the thread which was closed.
1 person has voted this message useful



nway
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/Vic
Joined 5415 days ago

574 posts - 1707 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 10 of 32
12 September 2011 at 8:01am | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
nway, the thread is about scripts, not economies and societies. You have already started
an offtop in the thread which was closed.

My point is that a script can hardly be considered debilitating if the people who use it are nonetheless able to prosper just as well as those that use allegedly "more efficient" scripts.

The connection should be pretty clear...

After all, if we're not discussing inefficient scripts with respect to their effect on the people who use them, then what is the point of even discussing this?
1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5056 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 11 of 32
12 September 2011 at 10:17am | IP Logged 
The main problem of the Latin alphabet is that it is made to reflect Latin poor
consonantism.
1 person has voted this message useful



yassi
Diglot
Newbie
Austria
Joined 4829 days ago

34 posts - 49 votes
Speaks: German*, EnglishC1
Studies: Turkish, Slovak

 
 Message 12 of 32
12 September 2011 at 2:59pm | IP Logged 
clumsy wrote:

It has tree letters for /k/: c,k,q but has no letter for ch!

This totally depends on the language you're talking about and on the way these languages uses these letters.
E.g. Azerbaijani uses all three letters c, k and q - but they represent different sounds.

k is like English "k" in "kind"
c is like English "j" in "january"
q is a mixture of English "k" and English "g" in "gold"

And Azerbaijani has a letter for "ch": ç - by the way, German uses a combination of four letters to write this sound: tsch.

1 person has voted this message useful



Yurk
Triglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 5730 days ago

29 posts - 37 votes
Speaks: English*, Russian, Azerbaijani
Studies: Modern Hebrew, Sign Language, Korean, Spanish, Indonesian, Irish
Studies: French

 
 Message 13 of 32
13 September 2011 at 1:02am | IP Logged 
The Latin script is fine.

As others have point out, you're only criticizing the orthography of English here, not the Latin script itself. And the
inconsistency of that orthography in the example you give is a result of phonetics, there is hardly anything
offputting about "doncha."

The way individual languages write the sounds present in the language is determined by that language's
community; it's not as if the Latin script has a deficiency of letters (look at all the variants) or something.

And the order of the alphabet is hardly a relevant issue in the grand scheme of things. If you want to criticize the
Latin script, talk about the shapes of the letters themselves or the general speed at which they're written in
comparison to other scripts.
1 person has voted this message useful



MarcusOdim
Groupie
Brazil
Joined 4847 days ago

91 posts - 142 votes 

 
 Message 14 of 32
13 September 2011 at 3:42pm | IP Logged 
I find that after the arabic alphabet, the latin alphabet is the most beautiful of all, the words simply fit each other perfectly. It's way better looking than both greek and cyrryllicaicxasxas alphabet
1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5056 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 15 of 32
13 September 2011 at 3:44pm | IP Logged 
MarcusOdim wrote:
I find that after the arabic alphabet, the latin alphabet is the most
beautiful of all, the words simply fit each other perfectly. It's way better looking than
both greek and cyrryllicaicxasxas alphabet

Why?
1 person has voted this message useful



Kartof
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5066 days ago

391 posts - 550 votes 
Speaks: English*, Bulgarian*, Spanish
Studies: Danish

 
 Message 16 of 32
13 September 2011 at 10:06pm | IP Logged 
MarcusOdim wrote:
I find that after the arabic alphabet, the latin alphabet is the most
beautiful of all, the words simply fit each other perfectly. It's way better looking than
both greek and cyrryllicaicxasxas alphabet


BTW, it's spelled Cyrillic...You've obviously never seen cursive Cyrillic. It all fits
together perfectly.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 32 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 13 4  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.6094 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.