Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

The efficiency of Latin script.

  Tags: Writing System | Latin
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
32 messages over 4 pages: 1 24  Next >>
MarcusOdim
Groupie
Brazil
Joined 4851 days ago

91 posts - 142 votes 

 
 Message 17 of 32
13 September 2011 at 10:35pm | IP Logged 
I just happen to not find it attractive, the Latin letters look 100x better to me, Cyrillic letters are kinda messed up and just not as cool, that's all. They are equally efficient though, far more efficient the those Chinese characters (another thread).
1 person has voted this message useful



cpnlsn88
Triglot
Groupie
United Kingdom
Joined 5041 days ago

63 posts - 112 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, French
Studies: Spanish, Esperanto, Latin

 
 Message 18 of 32
13 September 2011 at 10:46pm | IP Logged 
I only know latin script as well as similar variants such as Greek and the traditional German script (known, I think as gothic or fraktur) so this is a somewhat reductive post because the logic of these scripts (along with the similar cyrillic) is very similar. Historically they're more or less the same thing.

Of these I find non-latin scripts very pleasant to read and view. I find some sadness in the loss of the German script which I very much enjoy reading - I find the quality lf reading is a bit different, I tend to see words as wholes rather than breaking them down into individual latin characters (unfortunately I tend to do my handwriting the same way with variable results for people who need to read my work....). The origins of all latin type scripts is, of course, very ancient (i.e. with Greek beginnings of civilisation).

Of course all the other scripts in the world are beautiful to look at and probably evolved at similar times - you can't learn everything! Learning the basics of another script (i.e. radically different) is probably something we should all do to broader our horizons.

The inherent superiority of latin script is not something I would assert - unlike Arabic numerals which clearly are vastly superior (if we want to do any kind of maths...)

Of course, the latin script suffers somewhat because some languages have departed from a consistent graphic representation of sounds and in this English is a serious offender because usage has changed over time - one ought to blame the language not the script for this (if evaulating the script on this basis one should perhaps refer to more phonetic languages).

1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5060 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 19 of 32
13 September 2011 at 11:01pm | IP Logged 
English needs a spelling reform badly.
Before Peter I another script was used. It is used now in Church Slavonic.
2 persons have voted this message useful



JLA
Triglot
Newbie
France
Joined 4901 days ago

25 posts - 33 votes
Speaks: French*, English, German
Studies: Italian, Spanish, Russian, Dutch

 
 Message 20 of 32
15 September 2011 at 1:02pm | IP Logged 
If I really were to discuss the adequacy of the Latin alphabet, I think I would use a language like Italian which is a direct descendant of the language for which the alphabet was created. Then, you would see an almost perfect fit between sounds and characters (Italian writing is very close to be phonetic and evolved with the pronunciation of the words).
The same would be true with Spanish but not with French (much more "historical" spelling, where "ghost" characters are etymological and not phonological - hôpital would be an example where the ô symbol sounds like a normal o but originate from the historical hospital).
2 persons have voted this message useful



ScottScheule
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
scheule.blogspot.com
Joined 5232 days ago

645 posts - 1176 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Latin, Hungarian, Biblical Hebrew, Old English, Russian, Swedish, German, Italian, French

 
 Message 21 of 32
16 September 2011 at 4:22pm | IP Logged 
JLA wrote:
If I really were to discuss the adequacy of the Latin alphabet, I think I would use a language like Italian which is a direct descendant of the language for which the alphabet was created. Then, you would see an almost perfect fit between sounds and characters (Italian writing is very close to be phonetic and evolved with the pronunciation of the words).
The same would be true with Spanish but not with French (much more "historical" spelling, where "ghost" characters are etymological and not phonological - hôpital would be an example where the ô symbol sounds like a normal o but originate from the historical hospital).


But again, that's not really a criticism of the alphabet, it's a criticism of French spelling using that alphabet. I imagine we could make French much more efficient without too much trouble, English too. But the alphabet itself, it works fine.

And to call the alphabet specifically created for Latin isn't strictly true. It was adapted (ultimately from a Phoenician script--or maybe hieroglyphs) to Latin. But it's also been adapted to French, Spanish, and Italian.
1 person has voted this message useful



JLA
Triglot
Newbie
France
Joined 4901 days ago

25 posts - 33 votes
Speaks: French*, English, German
Studies: Italian, Spanish, Russian, Dutch

 
 Message 22 of 32
16 September 2011 at 7:12pm | IP Logged 
ScottScheule wrote:

But again, that's not really a criticism of the alphabet, it's a criticism of French spelling using that alphabet. I imagine we could make French much more efficient without too much trouble, English too. But the alphabet itself, it works fine.

And to call the alphabet specifically created for Latin isn't strictly true. It was adapted (ultimately from a Phoenician script--or maybe hieroglyphs) to Latin. But it's also been adapted to French, Spanish, and Italian.


I think you misunderstood me here (and since English is your native language and not mine, I would guess it means I didn't express myself clearly), I was actually defending the Latin alphabet and saying that the discrepancies between the spelling and the sounds are due to the fact that, in some languages, like French for example, the spelling didn't evolve with the phonology but instead remained based on historical factors.

Edited by JLA on 16 September 2011 at 7:29pm

1 person has voted this message useful



strikingstar
Bilingual Tetraglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5177 days ago

292 posts - 444 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin*, Cantonese, Swahili
Studies: Spanish, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 23 of 32
16 September 2011 at 10:06pm | IP Logged 
Be thankful there's an alphabet. Growing up, I really hated Chinese. It's the epitome of
all or nothing. You either know the word or you don't. You can't even attempt to 'spell'
it phonetically. (Maybe feeble attempt at guessing the root.)

And then Arabic has the annoying habit of omitting short vowels.

Compared to other systems, the Latin script has it good.
1 person has voted this message useful



ScottScheule
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
scheule.blogspot.com
Joined 5232 days ago

645 posts - 1176 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Latin, Hungarian, Biblical Hebrew, Old English, Russian, Swedish, German, Italian, French

 
 Message 24 of 32
16 September 2011 at 10:34pm | IP Logged 
JLA wrote:

I think you misunderstood me here (and since English is your native language and not mine, I would guess it means I didn't express myself clearly), I was actually defending the Latin alphabet and saying that the discrepancies between the spelling and the sounds are due to the fact that, in some languages, like French for example, the spelling didn't evolve with the phonology but instead remained based on historical factors.


I agree. What I didn't agree with your implication that the alphabet is a close fit for the Romance languages or Latin itself--I think you could adapt it to most languages, Romance or no, without much trouble.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 32 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 1 24  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.9531 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.