Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Interference L1 - L2 // Mnemonics

 Language Learning Forum : Questions About Your Target Languages Post Reply
22 messages over 3 pages: 1 2
VityaCo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7023 days ago

79 posts - 86 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, Ukrainian*, English
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, French

 
 Message 17 of 22
23 March 2009 at 1:28am | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
VityaCo wrote:
I have a very good article, that must be read by everybody who study a language. Here it is:
http://norvig.com/21-days.html

I don't think it's directly relevant -- he's talking about crafts, which are very conscious processes. I learnt to program at university, and it's nothing like learning to speak.

Did you actually finished to read the article?
Here is just one quote, for example:
"Researchers (Bloom (1985), Bryan & Harter (1899), Hayes (1989), Simmon & Chase (1973)) have shown it takes about ten years to develop expertise in any of a wide variety of areas, including chess playing, music composition, telegraph operation, painting, piano playing, swimming, tennis, and research in neuropsychology and topology. The key is deliberative practice: not just doing it again and again, but challenging yourself with a task that is just beyond your current ability, trying it, analyzing your performance while and after doing it, and correcting any mistakes. Then repeat. And repeat again. There appear to be no real shortcuts: even Mozart, who was a musical prodigy at age 4, took 13 more years before he began to produce world-class music. In another genre, the Beatles seemed to burst onto the scene with a string of #1 hits and an appearance on the Ed Sullivan show in 1964. But they had been playing small clubs in Liverpool and Hamburg since 1957"
1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 5953 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 18 of 22
23 March 2009 at 1:21pm | IP Logged 
VityaCo wrote:
Did you actually finished to read the article?

Yes. Notice natural language is not mentioned anywhere.

Now when you're talking about sports, it's all about reaction and spotting patterns to exploit (eg in racquet sports, when your opponent is at the front left of the court, a ball at the back right is more likely to beat him. You're training yourself to do that automatically.) But language is not a reflex action to be trained in -- it doesn't work that way.

Musical composition, too, is quite different from speaking. You take a theme, you expand on it, you alter it. You build up harmonies and counter-points. You revisit and modify bits as and when you feel the need. Musical composition is not a spontaneous skill.

Of course language needs practise to become spontaneous, but this article doesn't enlighten the language learner on that process.
1 person has voted this message useful



VityaCo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7023 days ago

79 posts - 86 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, Ukrainian*, English
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, French

 
 Message 19 of 22
26 March 2009 at 5:30am | IP Logged 
!?

Edited by VityaCo on 02 April 2009 at 2:33am

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 5953 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 20 of 22
26 March 2009 at 5:51pm | IP Logged 
VityaCo wrote:
"...have shown it takes about ten years to develop expertise in any of a wide variety of areas, including..." You can include more areas.
But enough on this topic, no arguing for the sake of it. Please.

Make an argument, say "no arguing", get last word. Great debating tactic mate.

Look, I said it makes no mention of language, and this is true. You say you can include more areas. Fine. Does is take ten years to develop expertise in orange peeling?

Edited by Cainntear on 26 March 2009 at 5:54pm

1 person has voted this message useful



icing_death
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5803 days ago

296 posts - 302 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 21 of 22
27 March 2009 at 6:34am | IP Logged 
aYa wrote:
Using mnemonics or wordlists to learn vocabulary is a waste of time. Much more effective is exposure to new natural contexts.

Yet passive methods don't work well for many. I prefer a combination of the two. Mnemonics and wordlists (or flashcards) to begin with, followed by massive exposure.
1 person has voted this message useful



AntoniusBlock
Diglot
Newbie
Sweden
Joined 5865 days ago

31 posts - 36 votes
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: French, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 22 of 22
03 April 2009 at 8:39am | IP Logged 
VityaCo wrote:

Did you actually finished to read the article?
Here is just one quote, for example:
"Researchers (Bloom (1985), Bryan & Harter (1899), Hayes (1989), Simmon & Chase (1973)) have shown it takes about ten years to develop expertise in any of a wide variety of areas, including chess playing, music composition, telegraph operation, painting, piano playing, swimming, tennis, and research in neuropsychology and topology. The key is deliberative practice: not just doing it again and again, but challenging yourself with a task that is just beyond your current ability, trying it, analyzing your performance while and after doing it, and correcting any mistakes. Then repeat. And repeat again. There appear to be no real shortcuts: even Mozart, who was a musical prodigy at age 4, took 13 more years before he began to produce world-class music. In another genre, the Beatles seemed to burst onto the scene with a string of #1 hits and an appearance on the Ed Sullivan show in 1964. But they had been playing small clubs in Liverpool and Hamburg since 1957"


Your thinking about language and expertise is correct. Acquisition of expert level language skills is actually already a mature research area within the science of expertise. On a more general note, one of the main results in the entire science of expertise is that it has been well established that the main psychological and neurological characteristics of expertise are general across all domains of expertise, with very few exceptions.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 22 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 1 2

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2734 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.