misslanguages Diglot Senior Member France fluent-language.blog Joined 4846 days ago 190 posts - 217 votes Speaks: French*, English Studies: German
| Message 10 of 26 03 September 2011 at 11:59am | IP Logged |
Learn some basic words at least, trust me. If you start listening to native material right away, you'll be frustrated.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
KCor Groupie United States Joined 5008 days ago 50 posts - 72 votes
| Message 11 of 26 03 September 2011 at 1:08pm | IP Logged |
How would it even be possible to learn a language simply by listening?
You could listen to the word яблоко 45,000 times a day, but unless you have some type of
association then you'll never, ever know what it means.
This seems like a huge waste of time.
However, if you were determined to do things this way then I'd say the only imaginable
way would be to watch movies. That way every time you saw someone grab an apple and say
яблоко then you would eventually figure it out.
That being said... it seems like a very slow and unsatisfying process.
Edited by KCor on 03 September 2011 at 1:09pm
1 person has voted this message useful
|
numerodix Trilingual Hexaglot Senior Member Netherlands Joined 6783 days ago 856 posts - 1226 votes Speaks: EnglishC2*, Norwegian*, Polish*, Italian, Dutch, French Studies: Portuguese, Mandarin
| Message 12 of 26 03 September 2011 at 1:17pm | IP Logged |
KCor wrote:
How would it even be possible to learn a language simply by listening?
You could listen to the word яблоко 45,000 times a day, but unless you have some type of
association then you'll never, ever know what it means. |
|
|
You mean like say.. jabłko?
We don't learn in a vacuum, we naturally use whatever associations we have, that's what this is about.
I trained myself to understand Danish completely by listening. I understand spoken Spanish quite well too,
never studied that.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
Марк Senior Member Russian Federation Joined 5056 days ago 2096 posts - 2972 votes Speaks: Russian*
| Message 13 of 26 03 September 2011 at 2:14pm | IP Logged |
Danish is very close to Norwegian. Polish is quite close to Russian too. But you have
learned the alphabet, haven't you? It means you do not study the language only by
listening.
Edited by Марк on 03 September 2011 at 2:18pm
1 person has voted this message useful
|
misslanguages Diglot Senior Member France fluent-language.blog Joined 4846 days ago 190 posts - 217 votes Speaks: French*, English Studies: German
| Message 14 of 26 03 September 2011 at 2:26pm | IP Logged |
If you're not willing to tweak your plans a little, you're setting yourself up for failure.
Not understanding anything is NOT going to be fun. That's coming from someone who learned English mostly through listening.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
numerodix Trilingual Hexaglot Senior Member Netherlands Joined 6783 days ago 856 posts - 1226 votes Speaks: EnglishC2*, Norwegian*, Polish*, Italian, Dutch, French Studies: Portuguese, Mandarin
| Message 15 of 26 03 September 2011 at 3:24pm | IP Logged |
Марк wrote:
Danish is very close to Norwegian. Polish is quite close to Russian too.
But you have
learned the alphabet, haven't you? It means you do not study the language only by
listening. |
|
|
I cheated a little, you caught me. I guess I'm just trying to find a method that is less
well tested, more adventurous. You know how some people when they don't have a problem,
they go around looking for one? Something like that I suppose.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
Марк Senior Member Russian Federation Joined 5056 days ago 2096 posts - 2972 votes Speaks: Russian*
| Message 16 of 26 03 September 2011 at 3:43pm | IP Logged |
I think real learning Russian will be interesting to you.
1 person has voted this message useful
|