Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

The good and bad of Teach Yourself

 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
37 messages over 5 pages: 1 24 5  Next >>
Akao
aka FailArtist
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5336 days ago

315 posts - 347 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Toki Pona

 
 Message 17 of 37
08 May 2011 at 9:12pm | IP Logged 
For a language like Japanese the pronunciation isn't so important until later.
1 person has voted this message useful



patuco
Diglot
Moderator
Gibraltar
Joined 7015 days ago

3795 posts - 4268 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 18 of 37
09 May 2011 at 1:22am | IP Logged 
Akao wrote:
For a language like Japanese the pronunciation isn't so important until later.

Why?
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 19 of 37
09 May 2011 at 3:59pm | IP Logged 
patuco wrote:
Akao wrote:
For a language like Japanese the pronunciation isn't so important until later.

Why?

Why indeed.

Since your comment followed mine immediately, I'll assume you were referring to the fact I didn't listen to the TY recordings -- I didn't say that I didn't think Japanese pronunciation was important; it's just that I felt comfortable enough with romaji and Japanese pronunciation as a whole that I didn't think I needed to rely on the recordings to know how to pronounce what I read.

I should point out I didn't know anything about pitch back then; it took me many months of exposure to Japanese through other sources for me to realize it even existed. *shame*
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 21 of 37
09 May 2011 at 4:40pm | IP Logged 
szastprast wrote:
Arekkusu wrote:

I should point out I didn't know anything about pitch back then; it took me many months of exposure to Japanese through other sources for me to realize it even existed. *shame*

That's surprising. The existance of pitch accent was one of the first things I learned about Japanese. My Teacher (gods bless her name) always said that listening and pronunciation are the essence of any language. It has always been so, ever since items of mortality (humans) came into this valley of tears. So the first thing I did was reading about pronunciation. What I found annoying was the fact that I couldn't gather enough materials to learn it properly. I naively assumed that any language course would cover such an important feature. If an engineer or an architect did their jobs in so careless a way, they would go to prison. With language courses and teachers anything goes. How demoralizing! I must say I was disappointed.

Even Steve Kaufman said he'd never heard of pitch when I mentioned it, despite having lived in Japan for 9 years, decades ago (if my numbers are acurate). Most methods don't mention it, or barely do. Or else they'll mention hashi and leave it at that.
1 person has voted this message useful



cathrynm
Senior Member
United States
junglevision.co
Joined 6125 days ago

910 posts - 1232 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Japanese, Finnish

 
 Message 23 of 37
09 May 2011 at 7:57pm | IP Logged 
I find that Chinese guys pretty much start learning about pitch accent from the start, and mostly they're shocked that all the English language resources ignore it completely. Honestly, I'm kind of with Steve Kaufman. I've been exposed to Japanese or learning Japanese awhile now, and mostly I learned about pitch from Wikipedia.    I just try to fake it, I have no idea how well I really do -- but I'm pretty sure I'm a mess with some words, since I learn about 99% of new vocabulary by reading. And I have had the experience where i say a word, I repeat a word a few times, and then the Japanese guy says it back to me, only then realizing what I'm trying to say. So I do have problems, I think. Oh well.

Finnish pitch is prescribed, but I think maybe Finnish pitch is little simpler than Japanese. Does have the odd feature of not using a rising tone for question.   Dragging this thing back onto topic, hmm, I just checked Teach Yourself Finnish, and I don't see any mention in a quick skim of the beginning. "Finnish: An Essential Grammar" has a nice chart that explains Finnish pitch.
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 24 of 37
09 May 2011 at 8:05pm | IP Logged 
cathrynm wrote:
Finnish pitch is prescribed, but I think maybe Finnish pitch is little simpler than Japanese. Does have the odd feature of not using a rising tone for question.   Dragging this thing back onto topic, hmm, I just checked Teach Yourself Finnish, and I don't see any mention in a quick skim of the beginning. "Finnish: An Essential Grammar" has a nice chart that explains Finnish pitch.

Finnish pitch? Never heard of that. Do you mean Swedish? Or do you mean vowel harmony?


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 37 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 24 5  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4058 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.