Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Gender-neutral pronoun for "he/she"

  Tags: Gender | Grammar
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
74 messages over 10 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 1 ... 9 10 Next >>
tommus
Senior Member
CanadaRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5870 days ago

979 posts - 1688 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Dutch, French, Esperanto, German, Spanish

 
 Message 1 of 74
13 November 2009 at 5:21pm | IP Logged 
Several years ago I was convinced that English needed a gender-neutral replacement for the perennially-awkward usage of "he/she" and "his/her". Possibilities would be "hem" and "hen". For example: "Hem must check in with the nurse to arrange hen vaccination." Initially that looks and sounds a bit foolish, but less awkward than "He/she must check in with the nurse to arrange his/her vaccination."

Has English ever tried to have such gender-neutral pronouns? Do other languages have them?

1 person has voted this message useful



Russianbear
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6779 days ago

358 posts - 422 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, Ukrainian
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 2 of 74
13 November 2009 at 5:33pm | IP Logged 
Doesn't it already have one - "one"? For example:

"One must check in with the nurse to arrange one's vaccination."

Edited by Russianbear on 13 November 2009 at 5:34pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5525 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 3 of 74
13 November 2009 at 5:49pm | IP Logged 
tommus wrote:
Several years ago I was convinced that English needed a gender-neutral replacement for the perennially-awkward usage of "he/she" and "his/her". Possibilities would be "hem" and "hen". For example: "Hem must check in with the nurse to arrange hen vaccination." Initially that looks and sounds a bit foolish, but less awkward than "He/she must check in with the nurse to arrange his/her vaccination."

Has English ever tried to have such gender-neutral pronouns? Do other languages have them?


Why is it more awkward to write he/she or one or you or everyone or something normal, than using words that sound like farm animals or parts of skirts? It must be about PC!
1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6015 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 4 of 74
13 November 2009 at 5:56pm | IP Logged 
"One" is considered archaic -- no-one uses it any more.

Modern convention is to use "they/them/their" for non-gender-specific.

However, this leads to odd exceptions to the pattern.

We don't like to say, for example:
*The police officer should wear their uniform at all times while on duty
because that seems inconsistent.

In general, we only like to use "they" in this way when there's no specific noun phrase mentioned, but there's this fuzzy line where sometimes the two can be far enough apart that it's acceptable.

Instead, we always try to use true plural forms when talking in general terms:
Police officers should wear their uniforms at all times while on duty.

If you remember to use plural for the general case, there's no problem and there's no need for new pronouns.
1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 7160 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 5 of 74
13 November 2009 at 5:59pm | IP Logged 
Off the top of my head, Estonian, Finnish, Hungarian, Mongolian, and Turkish have gender neutral pronouns for "he, she".

Estonian: ta (tema) = "he, she"; see = "it"
Finnish: hän = "he, she"; se = "it"
Hungarian: ő = "he, she" (also "it")
Mongolian: тэр = "he, she" (this is actually related to a demonstrative pronoun)
Turkish: o = "he, she" (also "it")

As far as I know with the first three languages, possession is also indicated in a way which doesn't give a hint of the gender of the possessor (unless we know the name of the person involved)

"his/her name is... "
tema nimi on... (Estonian)
hänen nimensä on... (Finnish - -nsa/-nsä is the possessive suffix for 3rd person)
a neve... (Hungarian - -(j)a/-(j)e is the possessive suffix for 3rd person singular)

I usually work around the potential awkwardness of "he/she", "him/her" by using "one" as suggested by Russianbear or turning the subject into the plural as suggested by Cainntear (e.g. "All patients / visitors must check in with the nurse to arrange their vaccinations") Even then, using "he/she" or "him/her" doesn't bother me.

The PC-aspect of this in English does bother me somewhat since in all of my years studying Indo-European languages which have separate pronouns for "he" and "she" (e.g. French, German, Polish, Romanian etc.), I never came across anyone who complained about the supposed tie to "sexism" in the language or the respective speech communities (to boot those I-E languages that I've just mentioned also have grammatical gender). I don't see the reason to make a mountain out of a molehill.
3 persons have voted this message useful



Woodpecker
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5815 days ago

351 posts - 590 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written), Arabic (Egyptian)
Studies: Arabic (classical)

 
 Message 6 of 74
13 November 2009 at 6:01pm | IP Logged 
Colloquial spoken English has two already replacements for the old-fashioned sounding "one." You can use "you" the way I just did, as a gender neutral pronoun that doesn't actually just apply to you, but to any individual. When someone isn't making a statement of possibility, they usually use "they," as I just did. In formal settings, neither of these usages are correct, and most educated English-speakers know that in formal writing one should use "one."



Edited by Woodpecker on 13 November 2009 at 6:02pm

1 person has voted this message useful



tommus
Senior Member
CanadaRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5870 days ago

979 posts - 1688 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Dutch, French, Esperanto, German, Spanish

 
 Message 7 of 74
13 November 2009 at 6:12pm | IP Logged 
Russianbear wrote:
Doesn't it already have one - "one"? For example:
"One must check in with the nurse to arrange one's vaccination."

Yes. That works in this case, but "one" sounds a bit formal and is not very common in colloquial English. It wouldn't work here for example: "The owner must take care of his/her car." Rewriting is often an option: "Owners must take care of their cars."

I don't recall other languages using the xx/yyy construction but probably many now do in this politically-correct world.

1 person has voted this message useful



Splog
Diglot
Senior Member
Czech Republic
anthonylauder.c
Joined 5673 days ago

1062 posts - 3263 votes 
Speaks: English*, Czech
Studies: Mandarin

 
 Message 8 of 74
13 November 2009 at 6:55pm | IP Logged 
The Politically Correct variant (particularly in academia) is now to use "she" and "her" all the time:

"The coal miner said she was meeting her sister the bricklayer"

It can get really irritating to read papers where people have tried too hard in this way.

The gender neutral words in English are "he" and "him". They are elliptic for "he or she" and "him or her" respectively. Just as "man" was long accepted as meaning "man or woman" - and only lost fashion quite recently.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 74 messages over 10 pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.9063 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.