Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Is Pimsleur the only good one out there?

  Tags: Pimsleur
 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
37 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 35  Next >>
alang
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 7222 days ago

563 posts - 757 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish

 
 Message 25 of 37
20 February 2011 at 5:16am | IP Logged 
hrhenry wrote:
Desertbandit wrote:
But lets stay on topic, besides Pimsleur and MT are there any good language courses?

I don't think there is anything else like MT or Pimsleur out there.

Certainly there are other audio-only courses on the market, but they don't give you the solid foundation that either MT or Pimsleur give you.

I know Linguagphone makes the "All Talk" series which claims you'll learn 2000 words, but I have no experience with it.
R.
==



I listened to only two lessons of LSLC 1 and pleasantly surprised how it used the Pimsleur method . In my experience LSLC applies the Pimsleur method, but with emphasis on the familiar form and more vocabulary. I am aware of the heated exchanges of a previous thread years ago referring to LSLC and I was one that said I pretty much would not buy the product. I still do not intend to buy it, as my Spanish is a higher level now. I do recommend it for beginners and if you like the Pimsleur style programs. LSLC 1 and 2 are already out and a three is coming out soon.

A LILC 1 is also out and I probably will use that in the future, after I have used Pimsleur.

I am guessing Paul Noble uses the MT style (Like LSLC uses the Pimsleur style) and used native speakers instead of non- natives. It would be a drastic improvement, but if you like the MT style of course it would be understandable to give the PN course a chance. I am willing to try it out due to native speakers on the course and I also like the MT style. Hopefully, there is no repetitive mistakes with the PN course compared to the non- native speakers in MT's Spanish course. (The male student specifically) That is another bonus, but time will tell the pros and cons.
1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5566 days ago

938 posts - 1840 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 26 of 37
20 February 2011 at 3:55pm | IP Logged 
The Paul Noble courses, whilst using the Michel Thomas idea of explicity teaching grammar with non grammatical terminology and then applying it to sentence building, do not follow Michel Thomas' method of having a pair of students making mistakes, with the listener learning from those students' mistakes. The Paul Noble courses contain Paul Noble, who gives the language and the explanation, a native speaker who gives the pronounciation, then Paul Noble asks a question, you answer, then the native speaker gives the answers.

In my view, the Michel Thomas method works better, annoying students or not.
1 person has voted this message useful



fsc
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6330 days ago

100 posts - 117 votes 
Studies: French

 
 Message 27 of 37
26 February 2011 at 8:20am | IP Logged 
My experience with Pimsleur French is pretty much the same as this review.

Edited by fsc on 26 February 2011 at 8:20am

2 persons have voted this message useful



Normunds
Pentaglot
Groupie
Switzerland
Joined 5965 days ago

86 posts - 112 votes 
Speaks: Latvian*, French, English, Russian, German
Studies: Mandarin, Indonesian

 
 Message 28 of 37
26 February 2011 at 9:01am | IP Logged 
fsc wrote:
My experience with Pimsleur French is pretty much the same as this review.

In short you are saying that the title of this thread is really disturbing. It states as a given (=Pimsleur is good) something that a lot of people gravely doubt.

Elexi wrote:

In my view, the Michel Thomas method works better, annoying students or not.

BTW Elexi, in my opinion the most annyoing in the MT method is the teacher not the students. It is possible that Michael himself has been a better teacher though; I've never heard an original course...

Edited by Normunds on 26 February 2011 at 9:05am

1 person has voted this message useful



leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6551 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 29 of 37
26 February 2011 at 4:58pm | IP Logged 
fsc wrote:
My experience with Pimsleur French is pretty much the same as this review.

Thanks - that was hilarious! It cracks me up when people try to use a single tool for learning a language, then write
pages of text complaining about how it didn't make them fluent.
2 persons have voted this message useful



leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6551 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 30 of 37
26 February 2011 at 5:00pm | IP Logged 
Normunds wrote:
in my opinion the most annyoing in the MT method is the teacher not the students. It is
possible that Michael himself has been a better teacher though; I've never heard an original course...

Totally agree. And Michel is much better than the other teachers, but still more annoying than the students.
1 person has voted this message useful



jazzboy.bebop
Senior Member
Norway
norwegianthroughnove
Joined 5419 days ago

439 posts - 800 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Norwegian

 
 Message 31 of 37
26 February 2011 at 5:29pm | IP Logged 
leosmith wrote:
Normunds wrote:
in my opinion the most annyoing in the MT method is
the teacher not the students. It is
possible that Michael himself has been a better teacher though; I've never heard an
original course...

Totally agree. And Michel is much better than the other teachers, but still more
annoying than the students.


I'm the opposite, I find some of the students make me want to bang my head off the wall
and shout obscenities with alarming regularity but usually find the teachers as being
okay. The woman student on the Japanese course really made my blood boil sometimes...

Michel was certainly well past his prime when he did those recordings though. Can't
really expect much better of someone in their mid eighties I suppose.
1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6012 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 32 of 37
26 February 2011 at 6:06pm | IP Logged 
leosmith wrote:
Thanks - that was hilarious! It cracks me up when people try to use a single tool for learning a language, then write
pages of text complaining about how it didn't make them fluent.

Hmm...
AmazonReview wrote:
The course states that you shouldn't use any other materials or consult a dictionary ... while doing the course

Pimsleur.com wrote:
Using the Pimsleur method, you'll be fluent in no time!

With every course claiming to be complete, is it any wonder that people expect to simply do a course, and that's that?


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 37 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 2 35  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3516 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.