Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Learning a language in two days

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
49 messages over 7 pages: 1 24 5 6 7  Next >>
Splog
Diglot
Senior Member
Czech Republic
anthonylauder.c
Joined 5669 days ago

1062 posts - 3263 votes 
Speaks: English*, Czech
Studies: Mandarin

 
 Message 17 of 49
19 May 2011 at 3:15pm | IP Logged 
Paul Noble has two advantages over MT:

1: He is still alive, so he can teach courses face-to-face. Some people prefer this
interaction over listening to CDs.

2: He is VERY patient. MT was quite grumpy at times, and some people found this off-
putting. PN is a very calm person and forgiving of mistakes. Some people need this.

Now, in terms of the actual material. I agree, it is clearly copied from MT and (at least
the French course) covers far less than even the MT foundation course. Again, however,
some people may benefit from this slower pace (for example, the woman on the MT french
course - who was hopelessly lost at times).
1 person has voted this message useful



hrhenry
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
languagehopper.blogs
Joined 5130 days ago

1871 posts - 3642 votes 
Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese
Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe

 
 Message 18 of 49
19 May 2011 at 3:53pm | IP Logged 
Splog wrote:

1: He is still alive, so he can teach courses face-to-face. Some people prefer this
interaction over listening to CDs.

Can't criticize the method, as I generally like the MT method, but hopefully he's taken the time to train native speakers and let them do the teaching, rather than teaching himself.

A while back I watched a short youtube video from some British documentary about him. They showed him teaching Spanish. His pronunciation is cringe-worthy. Really.

"Eh vizitahdoe"

R.
==
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 19 of 49
19 May 2011 at 3:59pm | IP Logged 
No doubt, the addition of a native speaker is essential.
2 persons have voted this message useful



jazzboy.bebop
Senior Member
Norway
norwegianthroughnove
Joined 5418 days ago

439 posts - 800 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Norwegian

 
 Message 20 of 49
19 May 2011 at 4:06pm | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:

Why reinvent the wheel? Paul Noble explicitly credits the MT courses with changing his
perception of language learning (see the link above). It would only seem natural that
he would build on, and hopefully improve, the MT method. I have to say that I was never
a fan of the original courses with the master himself. That thick Polish accent always
turned me off. But the method works for many people, and I respect that. If someone can
make it better, I can only encourage them.


No, he doesn't credit MT at all in that article. He said in an article in the Daily
Mirror back in 2007 before he had a language school that the Michel Thomas French and
Spanish courses "completely changed his life":

19675520/">Article

After that article Paul Noble doesn't credit MT despite the fact he has completely
adopted MT's core methodology. On the Collins website for example: "Eventually, after
teaching himself 6 languages, he went on to develop his own top secret technique".

All he did was construct his own course based on MT's method, borrowed a lot of stuff
from the MT courses and then makes as if he developed all this himself. It is just
plain dishonesty. He may have improved on a couple of things like pronunciation, but
the fact he teaches far fewer grammatical patterns which is basically the point of that
type of course kind of defeats the purpose.

I wonder how much he borrowed from the MT Method Mandarin course in creating his own
course.


1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 21 of 49
19 May 2011 at 4:29pm | IP Logged 
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
No, he doesn't credit MT at all in that article. He said in an article in the Daily
Mirror back in 2007 before he had a language school that the Michel Thomas French and
Spanish courses "completely changed his life":

19675520/">Article

After that article Paul Noble doesn't credit MT despite the fact he has completely
adopted MT's core methodology. On the Collins website for example: "Eventually, after
teaching himself 6 languages, he went on to develop his own top secret technique".

All he did was construct his own course based on MT's method, borrowed a lot of stuff
from the MT courses and then makes as if he developed all this himself. It is just
plain dishonesty. He may have improved on a couple of things like pronunciation, but
the fact he teaches far fewer grammatical patterns which is basically the point of that
type of course kind of defeats the purpose.

I wonder how much he borrowed from the MT Method Mandarin course in creating his own
course.


MT was reluctant to show his method to the cameras because he knew this was not patentable. Teaching structures and words in a specific order is something anyone can do, as long as you have the appropriate personality to be an engaging teacher. There is no need to credit anyone with anything and it's highly unlikely that MT was the first one to give a similar oral-based course. Though he likely was the first to create such a lucrative business out of it.

Edited by Arekkusu on 19 May 2011 at 4:33pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



jazzboy.bebop
Senior Member
Norway
norwegianthroughnove
Joined 5418 days ago

439 posts - 800 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Norwegian

 
 Message 22 of 49
19 May 2011 at 4:43pm | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
   
MT was reluctant to show his method to the cameras because he knew this was not
patentable. Teaching structures and words in a specific order is something anyone can
do, as long as you have the appropriate personality to be an engaging teacher. There is
no need to credit anyone with anything and it's highly unlikely that MT was the first
one to give a similar oral-based course. Though he likely was the first to create such
a lucrative business out of it.


Hmm, you do have a good point. It just annoys me to see someone claim they've freshly
developed something incredible and unique when they simply haven't but it's not really
worth getting annoyed over. Life's too short.

Edited by jazzboy.bebop on 19 May 2011 at 4:43pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 23 of 49
19 May 2011 at 4:47pm | IP Logged 
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Arekkusu wrote:
   
MT was reluctant to show his method to the cameras because he knew this was not
patentable. Teaching structures and words in a specific order is something anyone can
do, as long as you have the appropriate personality to be an engaging teacher. There is
no need to credit anyone with anything and it's highly unlikely that MT was the first
one to give a similar oral-based course. Though he likely was the first to create such
a lucrative business out of it.


Hmm, you do have a good point. It just annoys me to see someone claim they've freshly
developed something incredible and unique when they simply haven't but it's not really
worth getting annoyed over. Life's too short.

That's why there is a strong public figure behind each gimmick; that's all you can really market.

However, I just watched a video of him teacher. Oh man, it's so patronizing... he's treated students like children. Morever, I was very disappointed to see that he was following his notes -- I used to teach for Berlitz and I was able to teach classes and know exactly were I was going without needing any notes, and I didn't have a language school or a method named after me.

Edited by Arekkusu on 19 May 2011 at 5:12pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



alang
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 7221 days ago

563 posts - 757 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish

 
 Message 24 of 49
19 May 2011 at 5:46pm | IP Logged 
akprocks wrote:
You could learn Toki Pona in two hard, study days. Mandarin, I'm not so sure.


If Mandarin is marketed for two days, then I can see "Speak Spanish in two hours!", "Speak Esperanto in 2 minutes!" and "Speak Toki Pona in two seconds!"

Paul Noble is implying something that will not happen, but it will grab the attention of people.

It is no different than the lie Pimsleur support wrote that if you do all three comprehensive programs a person will reach 99% fluency. Surely with a Spanish IV now out it can cover the 1% left, but there will be some technicality to get out of it in one form or another.

One more thing I do think Paul Noble ripped off MT, but he probably won't be the only one.

LSLC copied the Pimsleur method, even though I think LSLC is also a high quality program. I just hated the aggressive marketing the company did when it first started.

Edited by alang on 19 May 2011 at 5:53pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 49 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 24 5 6 7  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3125 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.