Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Using non-native languages...

  Tags: L3 via L2
 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies Post Reply
20 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3  Next >>
deadscreen
Diglot
Newbie
United StatesRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4364 days ago

25 posts - 32 votes
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: French

 
 Message 1 of 20
07 December 2012 at 6:00pm | IP Logged 
This is a question for tri- and higher polyglots. After reaching a certain level of proficiency or even mastery of a second or third language, have you ever gone on to study a new language using study and teaching materials in your non-native language? How would you say this course of action affected your understanding of the new language? Did you learn new things about your already-mastered language that you might not have otherwise learned? And finally, do you think there are some languages that are best taught in a specific language?

This question came to me when I started looking into using the Assimil programs. My native language is English, and I am proficient with Spanish. The language I'm currently studying is French, and I hope to move in to Arabic after that. I checked Assimil to see if they offered an Arabic course, but all they had was l'Arabe (studying Arabic in French, not English). Though it's possible they also offer something in Spanish, that would still not be my native language.

So I wondered. Polyglots, what is it like to learn a new language using something that is not your native tongue?
1 person has voted this message useful



daegga
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Austria
lang-8.com/553301
Joined 4512 days ago

1076 posts - 1792 votes 
Speaks: German*, EnglishC2, Swedish, Norwegian
Studies: Danish, French, Finnish, Icelandic

 
 Message 2 of 20
07 December 2012 at 6:41pm | IP Logged 
I studied Gothic using English materials and some of my Old Norse materials were in Norwegian (especially the stuff about Old Norwegian dialects). Wasn't better or worse than using my native language. Well, maybe the Old Norse - Norwegian dictionary made the relation between the languages clearer and therefore helped me to retain words better.

I'm currently going over Teach Yourself Finnish and it shows me that I lack vocabulary knowledge in some areas of English like the names of fish. But then, I don't know a lot about fish names in my native language either. Generally though, when I don't know the English translation, that just means that I probably won't ever need to use the word anyway. So it might even improve my learning process, because it helps me to set priorities in what I learn (even textbooks for beginners sometimes use low frequency words because of the lesson topic). If I use translations into my native language, everything seems important.

Edited by daegga on 07 December 2012 at 6:41pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



Ogrim
Heptaglot
Senior Member
France
Joined 4630 days ago

991 posts - 1896 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, Spanish, French, Romansh, German, Italian
Studies: Russian, Catalan, Latin, Greek, Romanian

 
 Message 3 of 20
07 December 2012 at 6:57pm | IP Logged 
As a Norwegian, I have no choice but using non-native languages to learn a language apart from English, German, French and maybe a few others like Spanish or Italian. I once studied Romanian using French learning materials, I now study Russian using English and French, and I am using the German Langenscheidt course to study Greek.

I don't think this has affected my learning in any way. Sometimes I come over words in German or French that I do not fully understand, so it might require turning to a dictionary from time to time.

Anyway, it all depends on your level in the languages you use to learn other languages. For example, my Italian is not as strong as my English or French, so it would probably be a bit more difficult to use an Italian-based course.

6 persons have voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4698 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 4 of 20
07 December 2012 at 7:11pm | IP Logged 
I use French at times. I will miss an extra word here and there, but it's usually obscure
vocabulary - like I didn't know what an oak was in French. No big deal, I don't usually
climb oak trees for fun.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4835 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 5 of 20
07 December 2012 at 7:51pm | IP Logged 
I learned Icelandic through English (Colloquial Icelandic) and now I'm learning Russian with Colloquial Russian. There are no problems at all. The only problem I encountered in Colloquial Icelandic was the word "puffin" which I had to look up on Wikipedia. Some Russian verbs of motion were not absolutely clear to me when I saw their English translation, so I had to look them up in my Russian-German dictionary, but that's it.

The only "problem" is that most grammar explanations for native English speakers are redundant for Germans, because we already know cases, personal endings, emphatic particles, impersonal constructions, subjunctives, and the like from our own language.
5 persons have voted this message useful





emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5523 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 6 of 20
07 December 2012 at 10:51pm | IP Logged 
Earlier this fall, I spent 30 days studying Assimil L'Égyptien hiéroglyphique just for the fun of it. You can find the story starting on page 17 of my log, though most of it is in French. This was shortly after I passed my B2 exam, so you could say that I was awkwardly fluent. :-)

It was a total blast. I barely noticed that the course was in French, except that I had to learn a bunch of new French vocabulary to discuss ancient Egypt.

Of course, now I'm in the weird position of knowing that the two major kinds of palm trees in Egypt are bnrt and mAmA, and that the French call these palmier dattier and palmier doum, respectively. But I don't know what either of these trees are called in English. It's actually kind of fun to have subjects that I can discuss more easily in French than in English.
7 persons have voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6588 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 7 of 20
07 December 2012 at 11:04pm | IP Logged 
Josquin wrote:
The only "problem" is that most grammar explanations for native English speakers are redundant for Germans, because we already know cases, personal endings, emphatic particles, impersonal constructions, subjunctives, and the like from our own language.
Yeah. It's even worse if you're also a linguist and know a lot about things that exist in various languages. It's so annoying when the textbook author is "holding your hand"! I've pretty much stopped using textbooks because of this and have switched to natural learning. I still use L3-L4 dictionaries, though. And some textbooks can still be fun...like an Italian one for Croatians. And some Assimil - German-based Norwegian, Spanish-based Portuguese, Italian-based Spanish...

If you are willing to use textbooks, the best ones are based on related languages. Even for unrelated languages, French-based Assimil might be better though.

One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that this makes your L2 feel familiar by comparison. But nevertheless, the links between the equivalents can't ever be as strong as in your L1-L2, so it's much easier to think in the language and to understand things directly without translating them.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Bao
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
tinyurl.com/pe4kqe5
Joined 5757 days ago

2256 posts - 4046 votes 
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Japanese, Mandarin

 
 Message 8 of 20
08 December 2012 at 12:12am | IP Logged 
My Korean study is done mostly using English, but also some Japanese. Japanese explanations aren't that great, but that way it's much easier to find parallels in certain grammar points those two languages have and spot vocabulary of Chinese origin - and then figure out how those differ in nuance and usage. Otherwise I just go with what's available. (And yes I only count myself as bilingual, but my level in several languages is high enough to use them as base language for studying other languages or non-language related topics.)

Edited by Bao on 08 December 2012 at 1:40pm



2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 20 messages over 3 pages: 2 3  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 2.2031 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.