Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Esperanto

  Tags: Esperanto
 Language Learning Forum : Esperanto Post Reply
13 messages over 2 pages: 1
Fajro
Diglot
Newbie
Argentina
Joined 6608 days ago

3 posts - 9 votes
Speaks: Spanish*, Esperanto
Studies: English

 
 Message 9 of 13
22 December 2006 at 12:07am | IP Logged 
I not finish reading that yet.
It would be interesting to collect the opinions of some "denaskaj".
1 person has voted this message useful



alexptrans
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Israel
Joined 6769 days ago

208 posts - 236 votes 
Speaks: English, Modern Hebrew, Russian*, French, Arabic (Written)
Studies: Icelandic

 
 Message 10 of 13
22 December 2006 at 2:23am | IP Logged 
sumabeast wrote:
Captain Haddock wrote:
Languages are always classified according to their origins, regardless of where they borrow words from. English is a Germanic language because it evolved from Old German, even though at least half its vocabulary is French or Latin.


No English is classified as a Germanic language because despite the vast number of French and Latin borrowings , it's grammar and structure are still Germanic in nature.


Languages are never classified into genetic families by structure, grammar, or vocabulary. The structure and grammar of French, for example, are completely different from Latin, and yet it is considered a Romance language. The structure and grammar of Bulgarian are completely different from all the other Slavic languages, and yet it is considered a Slavic language. English is a Germanic language because we can trace its evolution back to Proto-Germanic. French is a Romance language because we can trace its evolution back to Vulgar Latin.
1 person has voted this message useful



sumabeast
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6930 days ago

212 posts - 220 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 11 of 13
22 December 2006 at 9:56am | IP Logged 
alexptrans wrote:
[Languages are never classified into genetic families by structure, grammar, or vocabulary. The structure and grammar of French, for example, are completely different from Latin, and yet it is considered a Romance language. The structure and grammar of Bulgarian are completely different from all the other Slavic languages, and yet it is considered a Slavic language. English is a Germanic language because we can trace its evolution back to Proto-Germanic. French is a Romance language because we can trace its evolution back to Vulgar Latin.


You are way off here.
The structure and grammar of French is clearly Latin in nature. ex: masc. fem gender, noun/adj order, admitedly I can't think of an example of a lang that has changed so significantly from it's origins that its grammar and structure has evolved along patterns of a completely different lang family.

If as you say French does not follow the Latin/Romance structure, then where would you put it?
same for Bulgarian and Slavic family, you say it's classed as Slavic only due to its roots, if not for that then how would you classify Bulgarian?

1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6772 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 12 of 13
22 December 2006 at 10:09am | IP Logged 
Obviously, Bulgarian would be an isolate if it hadn't evolved from Proto-Slavic, and ultimately Proto-IE. :) I think Alex's point is that a language might evolve a very different grammar and vocabulary from its progenitors, yet it's its geneology path, and not its features, that determines what family it's classified in. Language families are, by definition, groups of languages with common ancestors.

Edited by Captain Haddock on 23 December 2006 at 4:07am

1 person has voted this message useful



alexptrans
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Israel
Joined 6769 days ago

208 posts - 236 votes 
Speaks: English, Modern Hebrew, Russian*, French, Arabic (Written)
Studies: Icelandic

 
 Message 13 of 13
23 December 2006 at 3:42am | IP Logged 
You're right, Captain Haddock. That is what I meant.

Sumabeast: That is exactly my point. Even though the structure and grammar of Bulgarian are markedly different from other Slavic languages, it is still a Slavic language.

One of the most fundamental opposed divisions in linguistics is the division between languages with rich inflectional morphology (such as Latin and Russian) and rather isolating languages (such as French, Bulgarian, and English). A language that has changed from one of these types into the other (Latin>French, Proto-Slavic>Bulgarian) has undergone a dramatic change in its grammar and structure. The loss of Latin's seven cases in modern Romance languages, the development of articles (which did not exist in Latin), the change from Subject-Object-Verb in Latin to Subject-Verb-Object in modern Romance languages, the development of rather complicated, rigid syntax compared to Latin's relatively free word order--these are all very, very significant changes.

Edited by alexptrans on 23 December 2006 at 12:48pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 13 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2656 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.