Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

(Esperanto)

 Language Learning Forum : Esperanto (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post Reply
15 messages over 2 pages: 1 2  Next >>
tmesis
Senior Member
Mayotte
Joined 6652 days ago

154 posts - 146 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 1 of 15
22 July 2007 at 10:04am | IP Logged 
-

Edited by tmesis on 17 February 2008 at 3:13pm

1 person has voted this message useful



awake
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6640 days ago

406 posts - 438 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Esperanto, Spanish

 
 Message 2 of 15
22 July 2007 at 11:38am | IP Logged 
Esperanto is an Agglutinative Language, and it is VERY rich in its use of
adverbs. Certainly one can express oneself clearly in esperanto without
resorting to a lot of adverbs, beginners don't often use them that much and
do fine.   But the way adverbs work in Esperanto allows you to express fine
shades of meaning very elegantly. More advanced speakers tend to use
them a lot more in my experience.   So maybe that rises out of the
agglutinative structures, or perhaps something else. It's an interesting
question. I'll be curious to see if anyone else has thoughts on your
question.
1 person has voted this message useful



kinoko
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Japan
Joined 6640 days ago

103 posts - 109 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, English, Japanese, Spanish
Studies: German

 
 Message 3 of 15
22 July 2007 at 12:38pm | IP Logged 
Esperanto is not a true language don't even bring that up.
1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6601 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 4 of 15
22 July 2007 at 1:23pm | IP Logged 
What do you mean by not a true language? If it's spoken and even has literature written in it, it certainly has the right to be a language.
Although I didn't know it's an agglutinative one. Yes, it has a lot of suffices, but suffices showing shades of meaning and suffices showing grammar aspects are probably different, aren't they?? if they aren't then one can claim Russian is an agglutinative language for the same reason - it also has loads of various suffices.
1 person has voted this message useful



johntothea
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6632 days ago

193 posts - 192 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Russian, Norwegian, Polish, French

 
 Message 5 of 15
22 July 2007 at 2:09pm | IP Logged 
kinoko wrote:
Esperanto is not a true language don't even bring that up.


Your opinion is not needed in this matter. You bring up a COMPLETELY un-related subject into this discussion. Nobody cares whether you think Esperanto isn't a 'true' language or not. I think Esperanto is just as real as English. It started off artificial, yes. But people used different styles of speaking and took things from their native languages, and now esperantists speak very differently from the original language.

So um...learn when to keep quiet?
1 person has voted this message useful



LilleOSC
Senior Member
United States
lille.theoffside.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6695 days ago

545 posts - 546 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 6 of 15
22 July 2007 at 2:28pm | IP Logged 
tmesis wrote:


Have any speakers of other agglutinative languages noticed anything like this?
I have read that agglutinative languages allow speakers to express a lot of emotion. Personally, I like Korean better than the two popular Eastern Asian languages (Japanese and Mandarin).

kinoko wrote:
Esperanto is not a true language don't even bring that up.

I don't think that is a fair statement. Yes, Esperanto was started artificially, but look at how far it is has come. Many people believe it should be considered a natural language now.
1 person has voted this message useful



tmesis
Senior Member
Mayotte
Joined 6652 days ago

154 posts - 146 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 7 of 15
22 July 2007 at 2:32pm | IP Logged 
-

Edited by tmesis on 17 February 2008 at 3:14pm

1 person has voted this message useful



orion
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7025 days ago

622 posts - 678 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 8 of 15
22 July 2007 at 2:52pm | IP Logged 
johntothea wrote:
kinoko wrote:
Esperanto is not a true language don't even bring that up.


Your opinion is not needed in this matter. You bring up a COMPLETELY un-related subject into this discussion. Nobody cares whether you think Esperanto isn't a 'true' language or not. I think Esperanto is just as real as English. It started off artificial, yes. But people used different styles of speaking and took things from their native languages, and now esperantists speak very differently from the original language.

So um...learn when to keep quiet?


Your reply seems a bit harsh. Is kinoko not allowed to voice his opinion, as you are? One might also argue that no one cares what you think of kinoko's opinion of Esperanto. I would not say that though, since it would not be very nice ;)

By the way, I happen to agree with you in that Esperanto is a valid language. It is spoken more widely than some natural languages.

Edited by orion on 22 July 2007 at 2:55pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 15 messages over 2 pages: 2  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5625 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.