Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Modern Greek

  Tags: Greek
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
31 messages over 4 pages: 13 4  Next >>
JW
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/egw
Joined 6123 days ago

1802 posts - 2011 votes 
22 sounds
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Ancient Greek, French, Biblical Hebrew
Studies: Luxembourgish, Dutch, Greek, Italian

 
 Message 9 of 31
03 January 2011 at 6:57pm | IP Logged 
Merv wrote:
How profound are Turkish, Armenian, Slavic, Albanian, Italian, etc. influences on modern Greek? Has the language
tended to use such loanwords freely (cf English) or does it tend to go for Greek equivalents (cf French)?

I would summarize it as follows: Modern Greek is very similar to Italian and Spanish and I have heard others say the same. However, Koine Greek is not at all similiar to these languages. However, Koine and Modern Greek are also very similar.

Also, for reference, Greek can be broken down historically as follows:

Formative - prehistoric origin through Homer (900 BC)
Classical - Homer (900 BC) to the Alexandrian Conquest (c. 330 BC)
Koine - 330 BC - 330 AD
Byzantine - 330 AD - 1453 AD
Modern - 1453 AD to Present
1 person has voted this message useful



ellasevia
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2011
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6143 days ago

2150 posts - 3229 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Croatian, Greek, French, Spanish, Russian, Swedish, Portuguese, Turkish, Italian
Studies: Catalan, Persian, Mandarin, Japanese, Romanian, Ukrainian

 
 Message 10 of 31
03 January 2011 at 7:32pm | IP Logged 
Merv wrote:
How profound are Turkish, Armenian, Slavic, Albanian, Italian, etc. influences on modern Greek? Has the language tended to use such loanwords freely (cf English) or does it tend to go for Greek equivalents (cf French)?


Good questions. Modern Greek has lots of loanwords/influences, mainly from Turkish, English, Italian, French, and Latin. Actually some the loanwords from Turkish are loanwords into that language themselves, usually from Persian or Arabic. Here are a couple examples:
TURKISH: ντουλάπα (dulápa; closet), χαλί (xalí; carpet), γιαούρτι (yaúrti; yogurt)
ENGLISH: γκρέιπφρουτ (gréipfrut; grapefruit), μπέικον (béikon; bacon)
ITALIAN: καπέλο (kapélo; hat), μελιτζάνα (melidzána; eggplant)
FRENCH: πορτ-μπαγκάζ (port-bagáz; trunk), παλτό (paltó; coat), καφέ (kafé; brown/coffee-colored), ζαμπόν (zambón; ham)
LATIN: λουλούδι (lulúdhi; flower), σπίτι (spíti; house)

There are other words, like φούστα (fústa; skirt), which Modern Greek shares with other languages of the region such as Bulgarian and Romanian, but I don't know the origin of these. I don't know of any Albanian or Armenian influences, but there might be some. Slavic influences are also possible, probably more so than Armenian or Albanian, but again, I don't know of any.

Greek tries to keep its purity, but also accepts many foreign words, as seen above. For example, the international word "restaurant," which even in Japanese is レストラン (resutoran), is εστιατόριο (estiatório) in Greek and "computer," which is コンピューター (kompyūtā) in Japanese, is υπολογιστής (ipoloyistís) in Greek.
3 persons have voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6704 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 11 of 31
04 January 2011 at 3:04am | IP Logged 
I won't comment on the history of Greek as I haven't studied it in detail. As for foreign vocabulary it is fairly restricted, but a number of Ancient Greek words have entered scientific language i Western Europe. The problem is that these words sometimes have changed their meaning drastically in Dhimotiki. But Ellasevia's post covers these things fairly well. So I'll just mention some grammatical quirks.

The old Greek infinitive has been lost (to the extent that 1.p. singular of the present tense is used in dictionaries). Instead of the infinitive constructions of other languages Modern Greek has subordinate constructions, as for instance in "Θα ήθελα να μάθω ελληνικά" ("I would like to learn Greek", literally "(I) [optative marker] wanted to [subjonctive marker] learn Greek"). In Dhimotiki there are two stems, the present stem and the aorist stems. The present forms of the present stem have the uses that elsewhere are covered by the indicative present, whereas the aorist stem with the endings of the present covers both roles of a present subjunctive (with the marker να) and future (with the marker θα). The present stem with past endings (and a move of the accent to the left) has the function of an imperfect, while similar endings on an aorist stem function roughly as a perfect BUT - as you can see above - with να the form suddenly functions more like a past tense in the subjunctive ("as in German "ich möchte Griechisch lernen").

Italian speakers will of course recognize the similarity with their imperfetto/passato remoto, but there the similarities end - and I can't see that Italian has much in common with the system in Dhimotiki. On the other hand the weakening of the infinitive - with the resultant - effect on the syntax - is found in other Balkan languages, including Romanian: "Aş vrea să învăţ româneşte", and as for the role of Greek 'aspect' it is interesting to note that this in Bulgarian is crossed with a purely Slavic aspect system - at least this is what my Bulgarian grammar tells me, but I have not yet understood how the Bulgarians can manage such a system)

Dhimotiki has actually also got a compound (or periphrastic) past tense, which is very common, but roughly functions like it does in the Romance languages (i.e. it is encroaching on the area of the aorist). In English this form in Greek is called 'perfect', which patently adds to the confusion.

In Italian there is no synthetic passive as there was in Latin. But even Modern Greek has got a fully developed set of passive forms, and here the parallel between the endings of the present stem (present and past) and those of aorist breaks down. The former are simply made by fusing forms of 'to be' to the end of the present stem, whereas the forms (present and past) based on the aorist stem introduce the consonant τ, often weakened to θ: "μαθεύτηκε" (it was learned). In the Nordic languages we also have synthetic passives, but not combined with two aspects.

Also here there are periphrastic constructions ("ήταν κατανοητό ότι..." = "it was understood that.."), but the synthetic forms still seem to dominate.

So far I have only described the verbal system, including the effect the lack of an infinitve has, but if you look at adjectives and nouns you will find that there are four cases: vocative, nominative, accusative and genitive (I use their Latin names because I still haven't got Greek grammar written in Greek). This doesn't exactly make the language look more like Romance languages, but more like the Germanic or Slavic ones - if you except the one Romance language on Balkan, Romanian, which has the same four cases.

So the conclusion is clear: there are strong similarities with other Balkanic languages - across the traditional families - whereas any links to languages outside the region are limited and unreliable.


Edited by Iversen on 04 January 2011 at 10:14pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



ruskivyetr
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5482 days ago

769 posts - 962 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Spanish, Russian, Polish, Modern Hebrew

 
 Message 12 of 31
04 January 2011 at 4:39am | IP Logged 
Jeito wrote:
It may even be more complicated...Here's what I think I know. There is Ancient (Attic) Greek of
Homer, Troy and all of that. There is modern vernacular Greek (called Demotic) which is the language of everyday
life. There is a formal, ceremonial Greek called (Kathurevsa, or something very similar to that).


To quote wikipedia:
Katharevousa (Greek: Καθαρεύουσα, [kaθaˈrevusa], lit. "purifying [language]"), is a form of the Greek language
conceived in the early 19th century as a compromise between Ancient Greek and the Modern Greek of the time,
with a vocabulary largely based on ancient forms, but a much-simplified grammar. Originally, it was widely used
both for literary and official purposes, though seldom in daily language. In the 20th century, it was increasingly
just for official and formal purposes, until in 1976, Dimotiki became the official language of Greece.

So Demotic is the only official language now. Kartharevousa is absolutely obsolete.
1 person has voted this message useful



Nudimmud
Groupie
United States
Joined 5193 days ago

87 posts - 161 votes 
Studies: Greek, Korean

 
 Message 13 of 31
04 January 2011 at 4:59am | IP Logged 
Merv wrote:

How profound are Turkish, Armenian, Slavic, Albanian, Italian, etc. influences on modern Greek? Has the language
tended to use such loanwords freely (cf English) or does it tend to go for Greek equivalents (cf French)?



It would be interesting to see a study of what percentage of Greek vocabulary is foreign vs. native and what the related levels of frequency and register were. (of course there are myriad other details that qualify such thing, e.g. is 'sinema' a foreign borrowing (from French cinema) or ultimately considered native (from kinomatographo?) I haven't seen such a study but I'm sure they exist.

Anecdotally, when I listen to Greek popular music from the 30s - 60s, I'm often sent running to the dictionary to look up words which turn out to be of Turkish origin. On the occasions that I've run those words by native speakers and asked about usage, I'm usually told that such words are restricted to song or the social milieu of the 'manges' of the period. So, my impression, again anecdotal, is that over time many Turkish words have fallen out of use and others sound 'folksy'.

Of course there are still a large number in every day usage that are now considered perfectly everyday words and not informal or proletariat in the least.
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6704 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 14 of 31
04 January 2011 at 11:56am | IP Logged 
I think it is symptomatic that the Greeks use Greek gods to name the planets, - everybody else use the Latin names.
1 person has voted this message useful



stelingo
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5833 days ago

722 posts - 1076 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Italian
Studies: Russian, Czech, Polish, Greek, Mandarin

 
 Message 15 of 31
04 January 2011 at 2:11pm | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
The old Greek infinitive has been lost (to the extent that 1.p. singular of the present tense is used in dictionaries). Instead of the infinitive constructions of other languages Modern Greek has subordinate constructions, as for instance in "Θα ήθελα να μάθω ελληνικά" ("I would like to learn Greek", literally "(I) [optative marker] wanted to [subjonctive marker] learn Greek"). In Dhimotiki there are two stems, the present stem and the aorist stems. The present forms of the present stem have the uses that elsewhere are covered by the indicative present, whereas the aorist stem with the endings of the present covers both roles of a present subjunctive (with the marker θα) and future (with the marker να).


As I understand it θα followed by the present tense indicates future, followed by the past iense it indicates conditional. The subjunctive is indicated by να. (as you yourself write when explaining your example: "Θα ήθελα να μάθω ελληνικά" ("I would like to learn Greek", literally "(I) [optative marker] wanted to [subjonctive marker] learn Greek")

Edited by stelingo on 04 January 2011 at 2:12pm

1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6704 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 16 of 31
05 January 2011 at 11:03am | IP Logged 
You are correct, - I accidentally switched them when I inserted the Greek letters. Thanks for pointing it out.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 31 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 13 4  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4531 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.