Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

ELP is offensive to English people

  Tags: Dialect | Accent | English
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post Reply
46 messages over 6 pages: 1 2 3 46  Next >>
kmart
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 6125 days ago

194 posts - 400 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Italian

 
 Message 33 of 46
02 December 2010 at 1:23pm | IP Logged 
Whatever terminology is used, someone is going to get offended. It would be nice if people would just give each other a break and assume that the "offensive" term was probably not meant to offend at all. But some people really enjoy being self-righteous (says she, smugly).

leosmith wrote:
And remember, there is only one person who determines what upsets you.



1 person has voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5522 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 34 of 46
02 December 2010 at 1:25pm | IP Logged 
William Camden wrote:

Can't say I've noticed much sensitivity. The British historian Max Hastings wrote about the Korean War (1950-3) in a book published in 1988, and cited a former US soldier who told him re US attitudes to Koreans that "unless you were an anthropologist, a gook was a gook." South Korean, North Korean, it did not matter. Similar attitudes were carried into the Vietnam War.


This is ONE example, it's very old and quite specific. Do you really think this example refutes the statement that political correctness has a strong influence on modern media and discourse?
1 person has voted this message useful



William Camden
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6273 days ago

1936 posts - 2333 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Russian, Turkish, French

 
 Message 35 of 46
02 December 2010 at 1:39pm | IP Logged 
Gusutafu wrote:
William Camden wrote:

Can't say I've noticed much sensitivity. The British historian Max Hastings wrote about the Korean War (1950-3) in a book published in 1988, and cited a former US soldier who told him re US attitudes to Koreans that "unless you were an anthropologist, a gook was a gook." South Korean, North Korean, it did not matter. Similar attitudes were carried into the Vietnam War.


This is ONE example, it's very old and quite specific. Do you really think this example refutes the statement that political correctness has a strong influence on modern media and discourse?


I doubt whether "political correctness" stops racists from being racists, and its power seems to me exaggerated. Right-wing parties seem to reap huge numbers of votes by exploiting anti-immigrant feeling, anti-Muslim feeling, anti-Roma feeling, or whatever the favourite prejudice is.
On the Internet Movie Database, a commentator noted that the Nazi film Jud Süss (1940) was very "politically incorrect". Indeed. It was a curtain-raiser to the Holocaust, in fact.
3 persons have voted this message useful



hrhenry
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
languagehopper.blogs
Joined 5131 days ago

1871 posts - 3642 votes 
Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese
Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe

 
 Message 36 of 46
02 December 2010 at 2:06pm | IP Logged 
This thread has turned into quite the caricature of an arm-chair linguist. The term "backward" has now been compared to no less than three separate racial slurs.

Good job, people.

R.
==



Edited by hrhenry on 02 December 2010 at 2:06pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5522 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 37 of 46
02 December 2010 at 2:39pm | IP Logged 
William Camden wrote:

I doubt whether "political correctness" stops racists from being racists, and its power seems to me exaggerated. Right-wing parties seem to reap huge numbers of votes by exploiting anti-immigrant feeling, anti-Muslim feeling, anti-Roma feeling, or whatever the favourite prejudice is.


That's the whole point. People can't distinguish between racism and linguistics. If you don't like negroes, it doesn't matter if someone forces you to call them black, coloured, African-Americans or whatever, you'd still not like them. I'm saying that PC won't make people love each other, it's just a pointless restriction on speech. To it's proponents, it's also a way for them to feel good about themselves. "I say Beijing instead of Peking, so I atone for everything bad that Europeans have ever done to the Chinese (nevermind that they call England Yingguo)."

William Camden wrote:

On the Internet Movie Database, a commentator noted that the Nazi film Jud Süss (1940) was very "politically incorrect". Indeed. It was a curtain-raiser to the Holocaust, in fact.


How is this even remotely relevant? Just because something can be un-PC and racist, do you think this proves that everything that is not PC is racism?
1 person has voted this message useful



GREGORG4000
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5524 days ago

307 posts - 479 votes 
Speaks: English*, Finnish
Studies: Japanese, Korean, Amharic, French

 
 Message 38 of 46
02 December 2010 at 3:57pm | IP Logged 
I think that this discussion is too much about "political correctness" and it ignores whether or not something is nice. I hate "political correctness", but I still don't really like to call people "backward".
4 persons have voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6012 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 39 of 46
02 December 2010 at 4:32pm | IP Logged 
Gusutafu wrote:
Yes, that is quite obvious. My understanding of the term is significantly less dramatic, and does not involve cannibalism or even necessarily perversion. In my mind it just meant "culturally and economically less developed", a correct description of the countryside as compared to the city in most countries.

Then your English isn't as good as it seems (and it does usually seem very good). "Backwards" is an adverb of motion. It does not only imply that they're less developed, it implies regression and degeneration, that they are becoming less civilised. This is why it is not only offensive but also incorrect.

Quote:
The Indian government seems to bear me out, because they have both a "Backward Region Development Fund" and a "Backward Area Designation". Of course, they are not native speakers either.

No, they are native speakers, but native speakers of Indian English.

As they were mostly talked down to by the British invaders, they learned a lot of words as "normal" that would have been considered hugely offensive if they had been applied to a white man.

As to the recurring question of "what is the benchmark against which some areas are deemed as backward", I don't see why this is so interesting but it seems reasonable to use either the country average or the most developed part of a country as baseline.

I think the real problem here is that whereas I don't consider backwardness bad in itself, many people think that a man should be judge solely on his financial and educational merits. Being a traditional Christian, I don't necessarily think that education, wealth or civilisation (especially the modern kind) arer conducive to salvation. For this reason it does not upset me that some regions or people are called backward, since this is unrelated to a human being's real worth.
[/QUOTE]
1 person has voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5522 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 40 of 46
02 December 2010 at 5:35pm | IP Logged 
"Backwards" may be an adverb, but "backward" can certainly be used as an adjective, but even if you had been right about this, the meaning of the word would still not have to imply regression. Words do not always follow their etymology slavishly, and "backward" has actually been used to mean "behindhand with regard to progress" ever since the late 17th century. Take that, Mr Native Speaker.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 46 messages over 6 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 46  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4063 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.