Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Which language for time-travel?

  Tags: Dead Languages
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
44 messages over 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Woodpecker
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5811 days ago

351 posts - 590 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written), Arabic (Egyptian)
Studies: Arabic (classical)

 
 Message 41 of 44
01 April 2010 at 9:18am | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
Levi wrote:
I've actually thought about this scenario, and the answer is, without a
doubt, Proto-Indo-European.

You do realize that's a reconstructed, hypothetical language, right? (Maybe I just didn't
get the joke?)


It was real at some point...
1 person has voted this message useful



Johntm
Senior Member
United StatesRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5422 days ago

616 posts - 725 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 42 of 44
02 April 2010 at 5:35am | IP Logged 
Woodpecker wrote:
Arekkusu wrote:
Levi wrote:
I've actually thought about this scenario, and the answer is, without a
doubt, Proto-Indo-European.

You do realize that's a reconstructed, hypothetical language, right? (Maybe I just didn't
get the joke?)


It was real at some point...
Theoretically.
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 43 of 44
02 April 2010 at 4:31pm | IP Logged 
Proto-languages are reconstructed and we have no indication that they ever existed as
such. They serve to link child languages.
1 person has voted this message useful



Woodpecker
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5811 days ago

351 posts - 590 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written), Arabic (Egyptian)
Studies: Arabic (classical)

 
 Message 44 of 44
07 April 2010 at 9:42am | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
Proto-languages are reconstructed and we have no indication that they ever existed as such. They serve to link child languages.


We do know that they did exist, however, just not necessarily as we've reconstructed them. The fact that all Indo-European languages are related indicates that at some point there was only one Indo-European language, from which the rest evolved. This language was Proto-Indo-European. Whether it resembles what we have reconstructed of it is something we will almost certainly never know. I assumed the poster meant the language he would want to speak for time travel was the real PIE, not the reconstructed form.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 44 messages over 6 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2188 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.