Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Time for language to click & make sense?

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
12 messages over 2 pages: 1
Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 9 of 12
09 April 2010 at 7:07pm | IP Logged 
Pareto's law would dictate that 20% of those hours account for 80% of the progress made.
1 person has voted this message useful



vb
Octoglot
Senior Member
Afghanistan
Joined 6422 days ago

112 posts - 135 votes 
Speaks: English, Romanian, French, Polish, Dutch, German, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Russian, Swedish

 
 Message 10 of 12
09 April 2010 at 7:28pm | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
Pareto's law would dictate that 20% of those hours account for 80% of the progress made.


This would mean that a minute within the magic 20% would be 16 times more effective than one from the other 80%. Blimey.

Does it have a fractal quality to it: in other words, would 20% of the magic 20% itself be 16 times more effective than the other 80%?
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5381 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 11 of 12
09 April 2010 at 8:54pm | IP Logged 
The equation certainly works with word frequency.

I took a sample of 35000 words, containing 5700 different words.

The most frequent 20% of words equalled roughly 80% of the total word count.
1 person has voted this message useful



vb
Octoglot
Senior Member
Afghanistan
Joined 6422 days ago

112 posts - 135 votes 
Speaks: English, Romanian, French, Polish, Dutch, German, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Russian, Swedish

 
 Message 12 of 12
10 April 2010 at 8:23am | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
The equation certainly works with word frequency.


Zipf's law is along the same lines: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf's_law


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 12 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3125 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.