Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Swedish: Indefinite/definite form

  Tags: Swedish | Grammar
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
chirel
Triglot
Senior Member
Finland
Joined 5309 days ago

125 posts - 159 votes 
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish
Studies: French

 
 Message 1 of 2
16 June 2010 at 3:24pm | IP Logged 
I'm trying to learn when and how to use these and got confused by two examples in my grammar. I'll try to
translate the related rules from Finnish.

1. Indefinite form - as a representative of a class/group (lajinsa edustajana):
Ett barn behöver mycket kärlek.
2. Definite form - as a representative of a whole group (koko ryhmän edustajana):
Blåsippan är fridlyst.
--> So what is the difference? How do I know which group an expression should belong to?

Also I'm confused about when to use definite form with den/det and when not. In the book these are presented
as separate categories, but more than half of the categories that aren't under "without den/det" actually are
without it. (Solen sken från den klara himmlen and that blåsippan example.) How come? Actually there's a
separate article only in the example with an adjective: Den lilla flickan...

Could someone please help me and explain these problems to me?
1 person has voted this message useful





jeff_lindqvist
Diglot
Moderator
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6908 days ago

4250 posts - 5711 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 2 of 2
16 June 2010 at 6:25pm | IP Logged 
I don't have any good suggestions, but often we can find matching patterns in related languages, even distantly related such as English (or German):
Ett barn behöver mycket kärlek. - A child needs a lot of love. Saying "the child" (or 'barnet') would somehow imply a certain child, while the indefinite form 'barn' (or definite 'barnen') in fact could be used (in my opinion).

Now, why doesn't 'blåsippan' imply a certain flower, but a representative of a group? I don't know, but let us think of a similar pattern:
Telefonen uppfanns i slutet av 1800-talet. (The phone was invented in the late 19th century.)

Solen sken - The sun was shining - Die Sonne scheinte

Hopefully others will add their thoughts.

Edited by jeff_lindqvist on 16 June 2010 at 6:25pm

1 person has voted this message useful



If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.1582 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.