|
 |
(English) Casting metal | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages |  | |
| snig Groupie United Kingdom Joined 5890 days ago 71 posts - 79 votes  Studies: Italian | Message 9 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:06am | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
hope that helps,did you see the point I made about the !heart! Edited by snig on 17 April 2010 at 4:20am 2 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||
| Sennin Senior Member Bulgaria Joined 6034 days ago 1457 posts - 1759 votes 5 sounds | Message 10 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:16am | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
snig, thanks for the suggestions. (and I'm glad you like it!).
I'll just ask you to remove the text if possible because I didn't want to post the whole long thing here. I have saved your corrections in a text file so you can remove it without loss of the feedback.
Ops. Yes, it should be heart. I have a tendency to put -th- in far too many places.
What I want to say here is that females are not involved. It sort of becomes two times "of" (thereof of) which looks ugly but if I put "to" the meaning would be slightly different, I think.
Hmm.. is it an optional or obligatory change? Edited by Sennin on 17 April 2010 at 4:34am 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| snig Groupie United Kingdom Joined 5890 days ago 71 posts - 79 votes Studies: Italian | Message 11 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:19am | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
done!
1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| snig Groupie United Kingdom Joined 5890 days ago 71 posts - 79 votes Studies: Italian | Message 12 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:30am | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
no, it would still read that females are not involved in the process if you put "to" ,"of" is just wrong.,
1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| snig Groupie United Kingdom Joined 5890 days ago 71 posts - 79 votes Studies: Italian | Message 13 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:42am | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
if you wanted to leave it as is,I would put it in quotes and add a ! then it would be a very good literary style rather than a mistake,and I'm sure that's how you meant it,sorry I shoild have given you more credit,lol. Edited by snig on 17 April 2010 at 4:44am 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| Sennin Senior Member Bulgaria Joined 6034 days ago 1457 posts - 1759 votes 5 sounds | Message 14 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:43am | IP Logged | ||||||||
How 'bout this one:
Thereof is a funny word, I'm not sure I completely understand it. Semantically it's sort of like the ceci in French but formal. And it goes at the end (or near the end) of a sentence. Edited by Sennin on 17 April 2010 at 4:46am 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| snig Groupie United Kingdom Joined 5890 days ago 71 posts - 79 votes Studies: Italian | Message 15 of 19 17 April 2010 at 4:45am | IP Logged | ||||||||
yes that's fine and reads better now 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| TixhiiDon Tetraglot Senior Member Japan Joined 5464 days ago 772 posts - 1474 votes Speaks: English*, Japanese, German, Russian Studies: Georgian | Message 16 of 19 17 April 2010 at 5:19am | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
Sorry for jumping in unannounced, but how about?
"...the origin of baby dwarves (no need for a hyphen) and the involvement of females, or lack thereof, in the process" 1 person has voted this message useful |
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
