Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Response to past Pimsleur discussions

 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
148 messages over 19 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14 ... 18 19 Next >>
Kugel
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6541 days ago

497 posts - 555 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 105 of 148
01 August 2007 at 8:09pm | IP Logged 
On average, Pimsleur courses' cost comes to roughly $12 per hour. I think the course is very similar to a live tutor, an extremely slow one; and tutors for certain languages are typically 15-20 per hour. Some tutors probably are a waste, but I think one could find a decent one for the same cost of a Pimsleur program, which I assessed at 180 per volume. Can a student learn more from a real tutor for 35 hours compared to a fake one from Pimsleur for 45 hours? I'm thinking yes.

It is in my opinion that Pimsleur loses on the cost factor. I hope that this thread doesn't spend most of the time discussing money, as I think there are more abstruse matters on some of our minds'. Everyone already knows that Pimsleur is overpriced, relatively speaking.    
1 person has voted this message useful



dmg
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
dgryski.blogspot.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 7014 days ago

555 posts - 605 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Dutch, Esperanto

 
 Message 106 of 148
01 August 2007 at 10:42pm | IP Logged 
FSI wrote:
For me, quality cannot compete with free at a $1000 to zero ratio.


Re-reading my post, I see I could have expressed myself better. I meant only to say that a people are willing to pay for quality if the free version of what is available is inferior. This is perhaps not really applicable to the case of language courses because the FSIs are both "free" and "quality". However, the fact that some people (such as myself) prefer to pay for Assiml courses instead of using the free FSI courses clearly indicates something. Maybe "quality" here should be replaced by "appropriate learning method".

The second point, about being Devil's Advocate, was rather a bit of a thought experiment. Many people harp on Pimsleur because of it's price and its extravagant claims. For this experiment, assume that FSI is still a high quality course, but only available with a $1000+ price tag. Pimsleur on the other hand is available as a free download.

My claim is that most people on this forum would hesitate to recommend FSI to all and sundry given it's extremely high price tag, especially when Pimsleur is available for free and Assimil continues to be cheap (<$100 range). What is FSI was $2000? $10000? Would it stlil be worth it?

Put another way, at what point does being free make up for the deficiencies in a program? Coming from the Free Software world, I've encountered this trade-off a number of times. With regards to language courses, is Pimsleur so bad that even with a $0 price tag it doesn't have enough to recommend it? Given the time it takes to actually learn a language, a 45-hour commitment is really nothing. That's less time than it would take to watch all the online French In Action videos twice, and I bed you'd learn more French with Pimsleur. (Yes, I know there's more to FiA than just the video courses, but for the moment, in this thought experiment, they're not free. If the entire course was free, I think people would probably opt for it over the FSI French course, free or otherwise.)

Luckily for us, though, FSI is a good program (although admittedly not for everyone), _and_ it's available at no cost. This is very similar to the situation with Linux: high quality, no cost, but not everybody.
1 person has voted this message useful



LilleOSC
Senior Member
United States
lille.theoffside.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6694 days ago

545 posts - 546 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 107 of 148
02 August 2007 at 11:23am | IP Logged 
dmg wrote:


My claim is that most people on this forum would hesitate to recommend FSI to all and sundry given it's extremely high price tag, especially when Pimsleur is available for free and Assimil continues to be cheap (<$100 range). What is FSI was $2000? $10000? Would it stlil be worth it?


I don't think people would hesitate to recommend FSI just due to price if it was around $1000-$2000, and Pimsleur was free. Quality is a very important factor. Even if FSI was expensive, I still think people would recommend it due to its numerous drills, and intensive speaking exercises. If it was $10,000 then I think it would be a different story. I think that many people would argue that a $1000 FSI course is better than a $1000 Pimsleur course if FSI wasn't in public domain.

Edited by LilleOSC on 02 August 2007 at 11:24am

1 person has voted this message useful



manny
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6361 days ago

248 posts - 240 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Tagalog
Studies: French, German

 
 Message 108 of 148
02 August 2007 at 11:35am | IP Logged 
For accuracy's sake, shouldn't we be quoting $500-600 from <www.pimsleuraudio.com>. I assume it is the same product.

1 person has voted this message useful



august
Bilingual Triglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 6327 days ago

6 posts - 6 votes
Speaks: English*, German*, Modern Hebrew

 
 Message 109 of 148
02 August 2007 at 12:28pm | IP Logged 
Kugel wrote:
I went through the first 6 lessons of Pimsleur Hebrew as sort of a "review", but more importantly to see if these "comprehensive programs" really are comprehensive. In 3 hours this is what is covered:

1. excuse me
2. hello
3. understand(distinction between talking to male and female)
4. you(male and female, nothing else explained)
5. American/Israeli(distinction between male and female)
6. good
7. very
8. to speak(m. and f.)
9. want(m. and f.)
10. yes and no
11. so
12. to eat
13. to drink
14. something
15. here and there
16. street and square
17. too
18. but
19. it
20. English and Hebrew

I might be off by 1-3 words, but I think I covered them all. Now, I wouldn't be questioning this method, if the Pimsleur program went heavy on the grammar like Michel Thomas, but it doesn't. No explanation as to why one says, "I want(m. or f.) to eat(no distinction for m. and f.) something, please." I think the learner would better remember not just the vocab, but the grammar as well, of course, if he or she understood it in the first place. Here the learner is simply "guessing", going by what sounds right. Guessing on grammar should be discouraged, at least according to Michel Thomas. Guessing on vocab is harmless, but can the same be said for grammar?       


Hi Kugel,

I noticed your list of words covered in Pimsleur’s Hebrew. Which edition are you using? I have the 2nd Edition (2001) and I came up with a count more than twice as long as yours. (I suspect you speak Hebrew and you did say you did the course as a “review,” so you may simply have missed some of the more obvious items. However, as a naïve learner, they were very much new to me. I kept a running word list as I did the units.)

Also, in my actual list, I counted both forms of pronouns and verbs as separate items, since this was a new concept/structure for me, counted yes/no, here/there separately, etc. What I came up with was a separate “Word” list.   Listing each item separately as I did, your list of 20 items came to 30 on my list. And to that I added:

    1. know (m & f))
    2. I (m & f)
    3. a little
    4. Ah!
    5. See you.
    6. How are you? (m & f)
    7. Good-bye
    8. Thanks/thank you.
    9. fine/well
    10. and
    11. Where?/Where is?
    12. Rabin
    13. Isaiah (I’m not sure about counting names, but they were new to me and I learned the Hebrew pronunciation.)
    14. please
    15. Hertzel
    16. now
    17. at your place (m & f)
    18. at my place (m & f)
    19. me too
    20. When?
    21. Later. (more late)

Personally, I don’t think I could have handled any more vocabulary in the half-hour lessons.
1 person has voted this message useful



burntgorilla
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6447 days ago

202 posts - 206 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Danish

 
 Message 110 of 148
02 August 2007 at 12:43pm | IP Logged 
LilleOSC wrote:
dmg wrote:


My claim is that most people on this forum would hesitate to recommend FSI to all and sundry given it's extremely high price tag, especially when Pimsleur is available for free and Assimil continues to be cheap (<$100 range). What is FSI was $2000? $10000? Would it stlil be worth it?


I don't think people would hesitate to recommend FSI just due to price if it was around $1000-$2000, and Pimsleur was free. Quality is a very important factor. Even if FSI was expensive, I still think people would recommend it due to its numerous drills, and intensive speaking exercises. If it was $10,000 then I think it would be a different story. I think that many people would argue that a $1000 FSI course is better than a $1000 Pimsleur course if FSI wasn't in public domain.


I don't think I could justify spending any large sum of money on a language course. £50 ($100) would be about my limit, and it would have to be pretty damn good to warrant that.
1 person has voted this message useful



therumsgone
Diglot
Groupie
United States
Joined 6540 days ago

93 posts - 105 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: French

 
 Message 111 of 148
02 August 2007 at 12:50pm | IP Logged 
Although I do think people have brought up some valid complaints about Pimsleur, I wanted to share some of my thoughts about the program. First off, it is not comprehensive and should not be marketed as such. Three levels of Pimsleur takes you to a very basic level. That said, additional supplements allow you to take the structures you've learned in Pimsleur and make different sentences. Since the structure becomes so ingrained, novel sentence generation is easier.

I also don't think the importance of accent should be underestimated. With Pimsleur, you learn quite a bit about the prosody of the language and the way it should be spoken. This is especially important for languages where less resources are available, because pronunciation keys can only get you so far.

When talking about cost, keep in mind that you can check Pimsleur audio out from you local library for free (and you can decrease your environmental footprint!). This is what I did with Italian (which I am working on now) and the first level of French. I also just worked out the price for a college language course (at my school) and found that it costs about $1200 a quarter. That's about $3600 for a year of language instruction (at 4 hours a week for 30 weeks that's 120 hours of instruction). I speak from experience when I say that Pimsleur gets you talking much better than a college language course.

I'm saying this because I personally have found Pimsleur to be helpful in studying languages. It's not the only thing I use (Michel Thomas is just as instrumental as Pimsleur), and I wouldn't expect it to work as well on its own. It doesn't make you "fluent" in a language, but it does get you speaking it. I cannot generalize for others, but I personally think the program is very good.
1 person has voted this message useful



FSI
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6362 days ago

550 posts - 590 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 112 of 148
02 August 2007 at 12:55pm | IP Logged 
burntgorilla wrote:
LilleOSC wrote:
dmg wrote:


My claim is that most people on this forum would hesitate to recommend FSI to all and sundry given it's extremely high price tag, especially when Pimsleur is available for free and Assimil continues to be cheap (<$100 range). What is FSI was $2000? $10000? Would it stlil be worth it?


I don't think people would hesitate to recommend FSI just due to price if it was around $1000-$2000, and Pimsleur was free. Quality is a very important factor. Even if FSI was expensive, I still think people would recommend it due to its numerous drills, and intensive speaking exercises. If it was $10,000 then I think it would be a different story. I think that many people would argue that a $1000 FSI course is better than a $1000 Pimsleur course if FSI wasn't in public domain.


I don't think I could justify spending any large sum of money on a language course. £50 ($100) would be about my limit, and it would have to be pretty damn good to warrant that.


My thoughts exactly - as stated on the previous page. The idea that I would suddenly begin recommending a $1000 FSI program over a free Pimsleur (or Assimil, or Michel Thomas, or Learn in Your Car, or...etc) program is not one I concur with. As stated earlier, I don't believe any language course in existence is worth $1000 or any sum of money close to this. That money would be far better spent on other things in life.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 148 messages over 19 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4688 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.