11 messages over 2 pages: 1 2
Aquila123 Tetraglot Senior Member Norway mydeltapi.com Joined 5310 days ago 201 posts - 262 votes Speaks: Norwegian*, English, Italian, Spanish Studies: Finnish, Russian
| Message 9 of 11 08 November 2010 at 6:04am | IP Logged |
How many well-defined vowels is it possibel for alanguage to have?
If a language utilizes all these distinctive features:
Hight: low-semihigh-high
Tongue positions: front-middle-back
Lip position: unrounded-rounded
Nasality oral- nasal
Then the languaage will have 3 x 3 x 2 x 2 = 36 vowels
You can of cource have even finer distinctions, but then the vowels get less well defined.
Some of these voweø qualities are very rare, for example: high - front - rounded - oral
You find it however in Norwegian and Swedish.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Dragonsheep Groupie United States Joined 5274 days ago 46 posts - 63 votes Studies: Tagalog, English* Studies: Japanese, Latin
| Message 10 of 11 08 November 2010 at 7:25am | IP Logged |
Aquila123 wrote:
How many well-defined vowels is it possibel for alanguage to have?
If a language utilizes all these distinctive features:
Hight: low-semihigh-high
Tongue positions: front-middle-back
Lip position: unrounded-rounded
Nasality oral- nasal
Then the languaage will have 3 x 3 x 2 x 2 = 36 vowels
You can of cource have even finer distinctions, but then the vowels get less well defined.
Some of these voweø qualities are very rare, for example: high - front - rounded - oral
You find it however in Norwegian and Swedish. |
|
|
Don't forget tone.
cough* Vietnamese cough*
Vowels with diacritics (straight from Wikipedia):
Ngang or Bằng mid level, ˧ unmarked A/a, Ă/ă, Â/â, E/e, Ê/ê, I/i, O/o, Ô/ô, Ơ/ơ, U/u, Ư/ư, Y/y
Huyền low falling, ˨˩ grave accent À/à, Ằ/ằ, Ầ/ầ, È/è, Ề/ề, Ì/ì, Ò/ò, Ồ/ồ, Ờ/ờ, Ù/ù, Ừ/ừ, Ỳ/ỳ
Hỏi dipping, ˧˩˧ hook Ả/ả, Ẳ/ẳ, Ẩ/ẩ, Ẻ/ẻ, Ể/ể, Ỉ/ỉ, Ỏ/ỏ, Ổ/ổ, Ở/ở, Ủ/ủ, Ử/ử, Ỷ/ỷ
Ngã glottalized rising, ˧ˀ˥ tilde Ã/ã, Ẵ/ẵ, Ẫ/ẫ, Ẽ/ẽ, Ễ/ễ, Ĩ/ĩ, Õ/õ, Ỗ/ỗ, Ỡ/ỡ, Ũ/ũ, Ữ/ữ, Ỹ/ỹ
Sắc high rising, ˧˥ acute accent Á/á, Ắ/ắ, Ấ/ấ, É/é, Ế/ế, Í/í, Ó/ó, Ố/ố, Ớ/ớ, Ú/ú, Ứ/ứ, Ý/ý
Nặng glottalized falling, ˧ˀ˨ dot below Ạ/ạ, Ặ/ặ, Ậ/ậ, Ẹ/ẹ, Ệ/ệ, Ị/ị, Ọ/ọ, Ộ/ộ, Ợ/ợ, Ụ/ụ, Ự/ự, Ỵ/ỵ
1 person has voted this message useful
| CheeseInsider Bilingual Diglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5126 days ago 193 posts - 238 votes Speaks: English*, Mandarin* Studies: French, German
| Message 11 of 11 19 November 2010 at 10:30pm | IP Logged |
Ari wrote:
MäcØSŸ wrote:
Apparently the loss of final consonants in Mandarin resulted in the creation of tones replacing them (people will tend to say “bam” with a lower tone than “bak”, so the first may turn into “bá” and the latter into “bā”). |
|
|
Then where do the tones in the other Chinese languages come from? Cantonese has both many more finals than Mandarin and more tones (6 to 10, depending on how you count). Mandarin has lost tones over time, rather than gained them.
Here's how I understand it: The older Chinese languages were largely monosyllabic (that is, one word one syllable). Tones and a large variety of phonemes was how this was accomplished. Classical Chinese writing is pretty much monosyllabic. The historical development in most of the descendants has been to reduce the number of tones and phonemes, resulting in the need to create more polysyllabic words to deal with the many homonyms. In Mandarin this development has gone relatively far, which means it has few tones left and a mostly bisyllabic vocabulary. Cantonese has preserved more tones and more phonemes, which is why many words that are bisyllabic in Mandarin are still monosyllabic in Cantonese. I'm guessing the other Chinese languages all fall on different places on this scale. I've heard (though don't hold me to it) that Shanghainese only rarely uses tones to distinguish between words anymore, and even their word for "I" is bisyllabic.
EDIT: Cantonese has 19 initials and 53 finals, compared to Mandarin's 23 initials and 36 finals. |
|
|
Hey ^_^ I think you are right. The dialects of Chinese are on a scale. One end is Cantonese, every single word has a tone that is never altered by the preceding or following word. Then on the other end is a dialect like Shanghainese where, every tone in the sentence is affected by the tone of the very first word in the sentence. Then somewhere in the middle is Mandarin where it's in between the two extremes.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 11 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1 2 If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.1875 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|