Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Experimenting with French word frequency

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
55 messages over 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 57  Next >>
montmorency
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4831 days ago

2371 posts - 3676 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Danish, Welsh

 
 Message 41 of 55
06 September 2014 at 4:34am | IP Logged 
rdearman wrote:
Serpent wrote:
But in real life grammatical accuracy is
surprisingly useless, I'd say. Apart from certain specific "trouble points", you can
really screw up a lot and still be understood if you know the needed vocabulary.


I have to agree with this, I think a large vocabulary is more important than grammar if
you are just trying to be understood. For example:

Me you help find where train station?

will get a better result for a beginning English speaker than.

Could you please tell me where the ..... can't remember the word.... the .... errrr....





And even the oft-referred-to visit to the bakers could involve slightly more vocabulary
than "baguette", even if the baker or assistant didn't enquire about the book you were
carelessly displaying under his nose. For example the many varieties of bread or other
delicacies particular to this area. Or the woman behind you in the queue might start
talking about her ailments. And you are expected to commiserate with her on the
failings of the local health service. One thing can lead to another before you know it.
3 persons have voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5433 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 42 of 55
06 September 2014 at 5:27am | IP Logged 
montmorency wrote:
rdearman wrote:
Serpent wrote:
But in real life grammatical accuracy is
surprisingly useless, I'd say. Apart from certain specific "trouble points", you can
really screw up a lot and still be understood if you know the needed vocabulary.


I have to agree with this, I think a large vocabulary is more important than grammar if
you are just trying to be understood. For example:

Me you help find where train station?

will get a better result for a beginning English speaker than.

Could you please tell me where the ..... can't remember the word.... the .... errrr....





And even the oft-referred-to visit to the bakers could involve slightly more vocabulary
than "baguette", even if the baker or assistant didn't enquire about the book you were
carelessly displaying under his nose. For example the many varieties of bread or other
delicacies particular to this area. Or the woman behind you in the queue might start
talking about her ailments. And you are expected to commiserate with her on the
failings of the local health service. One thing can lead to another before you know it.

You never know what can happen when you go to the bakery in French. The way I look at it is that if you are
afraid of what trouble you might get into at the bakery with your limited French, then you should not leave the
house. For those who want to improve their French, then you take your chances. Personally, I would love it if
people spoke to me in whatever language I'm learning and not automatically in English as happens so often
today.

Actually, yesterday I purchased two baguettes, The dialogue went exactly like this:

- Bonjour, mademoiselle.
- Bonjour, monsieur
- Je voudrais deux baguettes, s'il vous plaît.
- Il m'en reste trois.
- Très bien, j'en veux deux. Bien cuites, s'il vous plaît.
- Comme ça, ça vous va?
- C'est très bien.
- Voilà. C'est tout?
- Oui, c'est tout.
- Alors. Ça fait quatre dollars cinquante.
- Voilà.
- Merci. Bonne soirée.
- Merci à vous, mademoiselle.

This is simple real French. Nothing that someone with 300 of the right words couldn't master in 30 minutes or
less. No complicated questions from the salesperson. No major complications with the other customers. In my
experience, this is about as complicated as it gets. The nice thing is that this little interaction is very
encouraging for the learner and can be transposed to many other situations.

If you're afraid of potential complicated questions, stay home.
2 persons have voted this message useful



eyðimörk
Triglot
Senior Member
France
goo.gl/aT4FY7
Joined 4102 days ago

490 posts - 1158 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French
Studies: Breton, Italian

 
 Message 43 of 55
06 September 2014 at 9:18am | IP Logged 
I don't really want to get into what words are the most necessary ones, but this stuck out like a sore thumb... cuit/cuite is a top 300 word to learn to get by in French? Having lived here for three years I've probably used it twice at most (albeit I've read it more often, but then again I read French recipes frequently). Understanding numbers is something you want to put a lot of focus on at the very very beginning of language learning unless your primary goal is to haggle at vide-greniers?

What precisely is supposed to be the benefit with this particular method over, say, grabbing a phrase book, prepping minimally each time you go out, and going out there talking every chance you get. With this method, it seems to me, you get much the same result except the benefit of a wider vocabulary when necessary and less time spent actively memorising. Plus, you get the benefit of being able to "get by" straight away, as opposed to learning a set number of words and being really disappointed with what you can say (not to mention what you can understand) because you honestly thought you'd now attain some particular level of "speaking".
2 persons have voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5433 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 44 of 55
06 September 2014 at 1:25pm | IP Logged 
eyðimörk wrote:
I don't really want to get into what words are the most necessary ones, but this stuck out like
a sore thumb... cuit/cuite is a top 300 word to learn to get by in French? Having lived here for three years I've
probably used it twice at most (albeit I've read it more often, but then again I read French recipes frequently).
Understanding numbers is something you want to put a lot of focus on at the very very beginning of language
learning unless your primary goal is to haggle at vide-greniers?

What precisely is supposed to be the benefit with this particular method over, say, grabbing a phrase book,
prepping minimally each time you go out, and going out there talking every chance you get. With this method, it
seems to me, you get much the same result except the benefit of a wider vocabulary when necessary and less
time spent actively memorising. Plus, you get the benefit of being able to "get by" straight away, as opposed to
learning a set number of words and being really disappointed with what you can say (not to mention what you
can understand) because you honestly thought you'd now attain some particular level of "speaking".


I actually agree with this post. It's just that I think the poster has not been following the entire discussion. There
is no top 300-word method. If I dare repeat what I have been saying over many pages is that I believe that
around 300 words broken down into certain categories will get you started speaking French. That's it.

The choice of words, especially the verbs and the nouns depends on your circumstances and needs. If the word
cuit/cuite is of no interest to you, then don't learn it. I would certainly not take one of the many frequency lists
that abound here and try to learn the first 300 words. That would be the height of folly.

The thrust of my argument with regards to the bakery example is that you do not need a huge vocabulary to buy
a baguette and, above all, you mustn't be afraid to go into a boulangerie because you never know what the
salesperson or other persons may say to you.

Edited by s_allard on 06 September 2014 at 1:26pm

1 person has voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5433 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 45 of 55
06 September 2014 at 2:03pm | IP Logged 
My interest in this question of minimum vocabulary size stems from my observation as a teacher that many
students make speaking French into something that is more difficult than it should be. And I'm talking about
hearing and speaking, not reading, not writing.

I find it intriguing that many people have studied French for years and are unable to order a coffee in a café, as I
see regularly. I'm not kidding.

At the other extreme, I see people, like a young woman from China recently, who can get by very nicely after a
month. And there are all the people in between.

My explanation is that the early speakers have figured out that in most everyday simple situations, you can get by
with very little. You can start interacting with native speakers with some key words and phrases. This is exciting
and very motivating because the language is no longer this insurmountable mass of words and rules.

Some people say this is all small-talk and you can't say anything serious. How can you have a discussion on some
heavy topic with 300 words? You can't. So what? At least you're talking. One day you'll get there.

And then there's the argument that you never know what native speakers might say to you. I love this argument.
Don't start speaking until you know at least 2,000 words. Suppose the salesperson at the bakery asks you
something about gene sequencing, what will you do? Better to stay home and learn how to say gene sequencing
in French before venturing out to buy a baguette.

OK I'm being a bit facetious but it's to make a point. If your goal is to speak French - I say this because not all
learners of French want to speak - get out there with those ten key verbs that make up around 60% of spoken
French and start opening your mouth.
1 person has voted this message useful





emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5535 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 46 of 55
06 September 2014 at 3:24pm | IP Logged 
For those of you who know your way around a command-line, and who have a basic knowledge of SQL, here are some notes on setting up your own queryable version of the Lexique database.

Code:
-- Using Lexique 3 from http://lexique.org/ with SQLite 3.
--
-- On the command line, to remove header and extract the first 10 columns.
-- iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 Lexique380/Bases+Scripts/Lexique380.txt | tail -n+2 | cut -f 1-10 > lexique1-10.txt

-- Set up our original data table. This is pretty raw.
PRAGMA encoding = "UTF-8";
CREATE TABLE lexique (
ortho TEXT,
phon TEXT,
lemme TEXT,
cgram TEXT,
genre TEXT,
nombre TEXT,
freqlemfilms2 REAL,
freqlemlivres REAL,
freqfilms2 REAL,
freqlivres REAL);
CREATE INDEX lexique_lemme ON lexique (lemme);

-- Import the raw data we generated above.
.separator "\t"
.import "lexique1-10.txt" lexique

Since I'm pretty sure that HTLAL will somehow corrupt the code above, there's also a complete version on GitHub with several more useful tables.

Edited by emk on 06 September 2014 at 3:26pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



Jeffers
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4912 days ago

2151 posts - 3960 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Hindi, Ancient Greek, French, Sanskrit, German

 
 Message 47 of 55
07 September 2014 at 2:04pm | IP Logged 
montmorency wrote:
And you are expected to commiserate with her


Dirty mind that I have, I read "consummate" rather than "commiserate" on my first glance.


emk wrote:

What you can do with only 300 words
- Have a controlled conversation on a known topic, either with a tutor or in class.
- Switch to a new topic by introducing a few dozen words.
- Learn (and even internalize) a large amount of French grammar.
- Make brief small talk with bilingual neighbors.

This put me in mind of Boris Shekhtman's language island technique. If you take a limited number of words (carefully chosen for the individual student as s_allard says) you could potentially create several usable language islands.




Edited by Jeffers on 07 September 2014 at 2:04pm

2 persons have voted this message useful





emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5535 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 48 of 55
07 September 2014 at 3:48pm | IP Logged 
For those of you who'd like to play around with this data, all my code and data is now available on GitHub.

For those of you who like pretty graphs and data analysis, check out this iPython notebook page. Some highlights:



And the same data as a table:



One thing really stands out here: Nouns are just brutal. They may only make up 15% of a typical text, but you need far more nouns than anything else. Seeing this, I'm actually prepared to believe that if you didn't count the nouns, you could construct a 250–500 word beginner vocabulary that would take you surprisingly far. But then you need to add over a thousand nouns to get any kind of reasonable coverage.

Or you need to spend a whole lot of time saying, C'est quoi, ce truc? "What's this thing?" Life's pretty miserable when you're missing two or three key nouns in a single conversation. If you don't have "train" or "station" or "ticket", for example, you're going to a really vague and awkward conversation. "I want to buy a thing to go on a choo-choo!. Where is the big place with the choo-choo?" Even if you've mastered the basics of sentence construction, missing nouns can reduce you pantomime and sound effects in no time.


6 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 55 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4551 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.