Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Finnish

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
13 messages over 2 pages: 1
FinnDevil
Triglot
Newbie
Finland
Joined 5391 days ago

7 posts - 15 votes
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish

 
 Message 9 of 13
20 February 2010 at 6:20pm | IP Logged 
It doesn't matter, whether something is physical or telepathic, it's mainly the "completed vs incompleted" dimension that matters.

Minä potkin PALLOA vs. Minä potkin PALLON alas jyrkänteeltä. (I kick the ball over the cliff.)

In the first sentence, the kicking has no specific end point, in theory it could go on indefinitely. In the second sentence, the kicking activity is completed when the ball is over the cliff.


The use of accusative vs. partitive is maybe the trickiest thing in the Finnish grammar. Still, there are many non-native speakers who manage to master it almost as well as native speakers.

Edited by FinnDevil on 20 February 2010 at 6:25pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



kyssäkaali
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5552 days ago

203 posts - 376 votes 
Speaks: English*, Finnish

 
 Message 10 of 13
20 February 2010 at 6:58pm | IP Logged 
FinnDevil wrote:
It doesn't matter, whether something is physical or telepathic, it's mainly the "completed vs incompleted" dimension that matters.

Minä potkin PALLOA vs. Minä potkin PALLON alas jyrkänteeltä. (I kick the ball over the cliff.)

In the first sentence, the kicking has no specific end point, in theory it could go on indefinitely. In the second sentence, the kicking activity is completed when the ball is over the cliff.


This is actually a very clear and precise explanation. I'll remember this and see if it helps me in speech! Thanks!
1 person has voted this message useful



Marikki
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Finland
Joined 5494 days ago

130 posts - 210 votes 
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Spanish, Swedish
Studies: German

 
 Message 11 of 13
20 February 2010 at 9:32pm | IP Logged 
FinnDevil wrote:
It doesn't matter, whether something is physical or telepathic, it's mainly the "completed vs incompleted" dimension that matters.

Minä potkin PALLOA vs. Minä potkin PALLON alas jyrkänteeltä. (I kick the ball over the cliff.)

In the first sentence, the kicking has no specific end point, in theory it could go on indefinitely. In the second sentence, the kicking activity is completed when the ball is over the cliff.


You could also say

Hän löi minut maahan. (~He hit me [once] so hard that I fell.)
Hän löi minut. (~He won me.)
Hän löi minua. (~He punched me once or several times.)

So, Kyssäkaali, keep on going by what sounds right :) soon you'll be able to hear also the finest tunes.
2 persons have voted this message useful



FinnDevil
Triglot
Newbie
Finland
Joined 5391 days ago

7 posts - 15 votes
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish

 
 Message 12 of 13
21 February 2010 at 12:23pm | IP Logged 
The accusative emphasises the result, completion, finality, either/or aspect.

The partitive emphasises the process, incompletedness, partiality, fuzzy logic aspect.


OK, these rules are quite abstract, it's probably best to observe how native speakers apply them and try to imitate that.
1 person has voted this message useful



aabram
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Estonia
Joined 5532 days ago

138 posts - 263 votes 
Speaks: Estonian*, English, Spanish, Russian, Finnish
Studies: Mandarin, French

 
 Message 13 of 13
24 February 2010 at 10:06pm | IP Logged 
I can't find exact quote anymore, but I remember one Finnish teacher comparing Finnish
and English saying that English is like a triangle standing on its base: it's very easy
to get started, with relatively small effort one can accomplish lot right from the start,
but as you progress, the difficulty still increases, keeping you busy with
irregularities. Finnish, on the other hand, is triangle standing on its tip. It's hard to
get started, you need to cover lot of ground just to progress a little, but it get's
easier and easier the further you go and even small steps give you much more progress
after certain point.

Or something like that, the original quote was much more eloquent.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 13 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2500 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.