Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Slaughtering of English

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post Reply
37 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 35  Next >>
Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5520 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 25 of 37
01 January 2010 at 7:09pm | IP Logged 
Woodpecker wrote:

I explained my point badly, but I think it still stands. Would you ever do that and actually think you're speaking English on a fundamental mental level? Probably not. I shouldn't have defined the point in terms of what the speakers call the language they're speaking; rather, in the subconscious agreement they are making about the medium of communication they are going to use. They KNOW on a subconscious level that the language they are speaking is called English, and I don't know that we have the right to override that.


I still don't think that the opinion of the speakers is very relevant. Some speakers of Croatian may feel that it is a separate language, but that is as absurd as calling Finland-Swedish a separate language. The are dialects, and extremely close ones at that.

Quote:

What are you using as the arbiter of what is "correct" spoken English? From the sounds of it, it's Standard Written English.


Not necessarily written English. Many AAVE constructions violate the rules of most, if not all other spoken English dialects.

Quote:

You basically said that modern African-Americans speak a language of a few hundred simple phrases that resemble "me no want eat." That's pretty damn racist. In general, you condemned as wrong the dialect of English in which "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings" was written,in which Ray Charles and the Blind Boys of Alabama sang, in which is rooted the oratory of Martin Luther King, in which one of the great struggles of mankind was played out. That's also pretty damn racist. I'm not saying you are a racist, but your argument certainly is offensive.


Actually, that is not what I said at all. I said that the origin of AAVE is a creole, and the English component is derived from a very rudimentary command of English, as found in uneducated slaves. The way I see it, if you take bad English, mix it with various African languages, mix in a bit of proper English and wait a few hundred years, what you will get can never be "good English". It could conceivably be interesting and beautiful, but in my mind, to the extent that you call it a variation of English, it's a bad one. Why not just call it a creole and be happy with that?

I might find Pitcairnese beautiful, and it is certainly unique, but it is still a Creole.

From your pathos filled description of Martin Luther King and his supposed part in "one of the great struggles of mankind", I take it that this is very emotionally charged for you. Perhaps you are letting that affect your judgment? I mean, seriously speaking, why would it be "racist" to call a language form wrong just because a certain political activist supposedly "rooted" his "oratory" in this language? What kind of argument is that? Anything even remotely connected to black activism is holy?

By the way, this is from the book you mention:

Angelou wrote:
The Black female is assaulted in her tender years by all those common forces of nature at the same time that she is caught in the tripartite crossfire of male prejudice, white illogical hate and Black lack of power.


Nevermind the content, but in what sense is this Ebonics? It seems pretty un-ebonic to me.

PS She said "black" so it's ok for me to call it "black activism".


Edited by Gusutafu on 01 January 2010 at 7:14pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



elvisrules
Tetraglot
Senior Member
BelgiumRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5468 days ago

286 posts - 390 votes 
Speaks: French, English*, Dutch, Flemish
Studies: Lowland Scots, Japanese, German

 
 Message 26 of 37
01 January 2010 at 7:19pm | IP Logged 
Muz9 wrote:
elvisrules wrote:
 English is just a bastard child of German and Norman, it's not even a language.


Stop trolling,

German sounds nothing like English. English has more Frisian and Anglo-Saxon roots than German.

I was using sarcasm for effect, not trolling. And I didn't mean the modern German language, but 'Germanic'.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Woodpecker
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5810 days ago

351 posts - 590 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written), Arabic (Egyptian)
Studies: Arabic (classical)

 
 Message 27 of 37
01 January 2010 at 7:26pm | IP Logged 
Angelou, like everyone I mentioned, was perfectly capable of code-switching, and did so on occasion because she understood well the power of both of her dialects of English, but she did do most writing in standard English. On further reflection, a better example would be Langston Hughes, who was a true master of the register switch.

Henceforth, I am not going to engage in these sorts of discussions. Many Europeans clearly do not have a very good grasp of race relations and their history in the United States, and that's not a problem I have time or the energy to try to correct. It's unfortunate that it comes through so much in the form of linguistic supremacism. Again, given the racially-charged content of this thread, I think it should be locked, but either way I will not be posting again.
4 persons have voted this message useful



datsunking1
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5584 days ago

1014 posts - 1533 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: German, Russian, Dutch, French

 
 Message 28 of 37
01 January 2010 at 7:37pm | IP Logged 
Wow I had no idea this thread would become a warzone! Calm down people, I was just pointing out the common place that poor grammar and English has taken in our society.

It baffles me that even with poor grammar and usages, someone can still be understood by the masses, correctly.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but lets keep the racism, fighting, etc to a minimum. We're supposed to be a civilized forum of educated and dedicated language learners!

-Jordan
1 person has voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5520 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 29 of 37
01 January 2010 at 7:54pm | IP Logged 
Woodpecker wrote:

Henceforth, I am not going to engage in these sorts of discussions. Many Europeans clearly do not have a very good grasp of race relations and their history in the United States, and that's not a problem I have time or the energy to try to correct.


This may be true, but that is hardly relevant in this case. We are talking about language, not race. The skin colour of the speakers is not even a side issue, it is irrelevant. If you want to lecture us on how you used to treat Black people in America, this is not the place.

OldAccountBroke's comments are more relevant, except his opinion on the term Creole. Sure, you may say that English was formed as a creole, though probably not by speakers with so little knowledge of the base language, as so much of PIE is still left in OE. But still, this only serves to enhance my case, because English IS considered a separate language. Mind you, I am not saying that AAVE is necessarily inferior in the grand scheme of things (although I am not dismissing the possibility to deem languages inferior or superior), I am just saying that IF you see Ebonics as a form of English, it's a very ugly one. Considered as a separate language, it may be just fine.

However, in most cases discussed here I don't see how AAVE even enters the picture. The speech of rappers and would-be-gangstas surely isn't AAVE, is it? Because as far as I can see (and I have bought about a thousand hip-hop records in my day) they just take normal English, talk very offensively and boastfully and disregards conjugations and generally mess it up, there are no African words there, are there?
2 persons have voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5520 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 31 of 37
01 January 2010 at 8:24pm | IP Logged 
Tombstone wrote:

-- I am sorry, Gusutafu, but I have to disagree.
I do not see how this statment could be considered "relevant" to anything.


No, not this post (which is not very enlightening), rather the one about creoles and the origins of English!
1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 37 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 2 35  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2813 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.