26 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
Dr. Fel Diglot Newbie Australia Joined 5644 days ago 6 posts - 6 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: German, Mandarin, Japanese
| Message 25 of 26 27 June 2009 at 5:51pm | IP Logged |
I have been trying to think of a functional modern definition of a polymath. It is obviously difficult as no one is brilliant at everything and it is hard to define just how broad and deep ones abilities need to be.
The multiple-intelligences approach seems to at least offer a potential framework. The actual theory itself has been somewhat discredited though it still has it's uses. The idea stems from the fact that a traditional "IQ" test usually measures a combination of 1) Numerical 2) Visuo-Spatial and 3) Verbal intelligence. Some authors have thought to broaden that definition to include the following 10 intelligences.
1) Verbal: Ability related to linguistics / language etc
2) Numerical: ability to modulate and see relationships between numbers
3) Visuo-spatial:
4) Physical: sporting ability / health
5) Creative:
6) Social: ability in social situations
7) Personal: Self awareness / emotional intelligence / self talk etc
8) Spiritual: Difficult to define / sense of ones place in the world
9) Sexual: somewhat obvious
10) Sensual: Ability to use and appreciate with your senses
My "modern" idea of a polymath would be to chose at least one hobby / interest per intelligence above and then attempt to improve and improve at it. Obviously the categories are somewhat arbitrary and many hobbies could involve multiple categories.
Still... it my closest current working definition of what it would take to be a polymath.
Anyway... any opinions?
Dr. Fel
1 person has voted this message useful
| Jar-ptitsa Triglot Senior Member Belgium Joined 5900 days ago 980 posts - 1006 votes Speaks: French*, Dutch, German
| Message 26 of 26 27 June 2009 at 9:10pm | IP Logged |
Dr. Fel wrote:
I have been trying to think of a functional modern definition of a polymath. It is obviously difficult as no one is brilliant at everything and it is hard to define just how broad and deep ones abilities need to be.
The multiple-intelligences approach seems to at least offer a potential framework. The actual theory itself has been somewhat discredited though it still has it's uses. The idea stems from the fact that a traditional "IQ" test usually measures a combination of 1) Numerical 2) Visuo-Spatial and 3) Verbal intelligence. Some authors have thought to broaden that definition to include the following 10 intelligences.
1) Verbal: Ability related to linguistics / language etc
2) Numerical: ability to modulate and see relationships between numbers
3) Visuo-spatial:
4) Physical: sporting ability / health
5) Creative:
6) Social: ability in social situations
7) Personal: Self awareness / emotional intelligence / self talk etc
8) Spiritual: Difficult to define / sense of ones place in the world
9) Sexual: somewhat obvious
10) Sensual: Ability to use and appreciate with your senses
My "modern" idea of a polymath would be to chose at least one hobby / interest per intelligence above and then attempt to improve and improve at it. Obviously the categories are somewhat arbitrary and many hobbies could involve multiple categories.
Still... it my closest current working definition of what it would take to be a polymath.
Anyway... any opinions?
Dr. Fel |
|
|
Music, art?
1 person has voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 26 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|