Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Confused by reviews

  Tags: Usefulness | Assimil
 Language Learning Forum : Advice Center Post Reply
52 messages over 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 57  Next >>
roncy
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5923 days ago

105 posts - 112 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, German, Spanish, Latin

 
 Message 41 of 52
04 December 2008 at 10:47am | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
Argh -- hit "quote" instead of "edit".

Why didn't you just hit "delete" instead of being your usual self-opinionated know-all. Stop being the figure in goindol's link. The linked-to picture is funny, but you're not, even if or when you think so.
1 person has voted this message useful



charlmartell
Super Polyglot
Senior Member
Portugal
Joined 6250 days ago

286 posts - 298 votes 
Speaks: French, English, German, Luxembourgish*, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Dutch, Italian, Latin, Ancient Greek
Studies: Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 42 of 52
04 December 2008 at 12:30pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
Leopejo wrote:
Luckily, "whom" and "shall" are still widely taught in schools across the world.

What do you mean "luckily"? Any school that teaches these is not teaching English. Whom is dead, and only belongs in old writing. The same goes for shall. Regardless of what your teacher says, do not use these words.

You mean: Any school that teaches these is not teaching Scottish.
What makes you so sure you actually know eveything better?
I was glad to see at least one other person finds your proliferous stubbornly know-it-all-better posts as silly as I do. You may not be a troll, but you're just as irritating.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6017 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 43 of 52
04 December 2008 at 1:07pm | IP Logged 
roncy wrote:
Why didn't you just hit "delete" instead of being your usual self-opinionated know-all.

That would be down to the lack of a "delete" button. I know there used to be one, but it wasn't there today -- I looked.

Edit: And I checked after posting this: no delete button.

charlmartell wrote:
You mean: Any school that teaches these is not teaching Scottish.
What makes you so sure you actually know eveything better?

This is nothing to do with dialectal variation in Scotland, Australia, the USA or even India. Well, maybe they still speak like that in India.

However, the post I originally replied to was an Australian saying that "he didn't know" about these rules. There is a very dangerous tendency to defer to old books as he did. And then a non-native speaker says he is glad that these things are still taught. But no-one speaks like that.

It is now widely accepted in academia that across the board people do not use whom, except for in a very concious way in formal contexts because they think that they are supposed to.

There are some publications that stick to their guns and whose style guides insist that shall and whom are acceptable (eg http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/tools_and_services/specials /style_guide/) but even their editors manage to let normal usage pass.

The Guardian has a more pragmatic approach, pointing out that "Use of “whom” has all but disappeared from spoken English, and
seems to be going the same way in most forms of written English too." and saying that both forms are acceptable in print.
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/200 7/12/11/guardianstylebook2007.pdf

I'll shut up about this now. Promise. Zipped.

Edited by Cainntear on 04 December 2008 at 1:08pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Ham
Newbie
United Kingdom
Joined 5995 days ago

21 posts - 21 votes
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish

 
 Message 44 of 52
04 December 2008 at 1:13pm | IP Logged 
I am confused, I am English, and whilst I don't use 'whom' as often as I should I do say it, and I use 'shall' pretty often . My grammar is by no means perfect but these words I think are perfectly acceptable to use.

Edited by Ham on 04 December 2008 at 1:20pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 7162 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 45 of 52
04 December 2008 at 1:59pm | IP Logged 
Huh?

"Whom" seems fine to me. The most that one could say is that the distinction between "who" and "whom" is not made by a lot of speakers, but there are still those (like me) who make the distinction between them, even in speech.

"Shall" is not something that I use often, but I couldn't consider it to be wrong if someone were to use it in a construction such as "I shall".
1 person has voted this message useful



fanatic
Octoglot
Senior Member
Australia
speedmathematics.com
Joined 7152 days ago

1152 posts - 1818 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, French, Afrikaans, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Dutch
Studies: Swedish, Norwegian, Polish, Modern Hebrew, Malay, Mandarin, Esperanto

 
 Message 46 of 52
04 December 2008 at 6:21pm | IP Logged 
You missed the point. I was asked if Assimil taught sufficient grammar. My reply was that Assimil did teach sufficient grammar for normal use of the language but, if you want to know more, you buy a grammar book.

My point was that you don't need to know the technicalities of English to get by in the language or even to speak it fluently. These were all questions I was asked when I taught English in Germany.

And Cainntear, there are plenty of people who use the grammar examples I gave. When I was in America I would ask for someone on the phone and get the reply, this is she. It is correct English usage but I have only heard Americans use it.

I would be wary of an English course that taught that construction as it sounds incredibly stilted. I was careful when teaching English in Germany to explain this but some German teachers didn't like me saying you could get away without saying "whom".

Again I make the point, Assimil is a complete language course for all practical purposes. If you want to make the fine grammar distinctions, buy a grammar book.

Edited by fanatic on 04 December 2008 at 6:23pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6017 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 48 of 52
05 December 2008 at 6:13am | IP Logged 
I quite like the Longman Student Grammar of Written and Spoken English, which was a set text I used at university.

I've also used Practical English Usage, but I find the layout of the Longman book makes things clearer and easier to find (although that may simply be because my tutor explained how to use it!)


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 52 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3125 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.