19 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3
mick33 Senior Member United States Joined 5926 days ago 1335 posts - 1632 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Finnish Studies: Thai, Polish, Afrikaans, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Spanish, Swedish
| Message 17 of 19 21 May 2009 at 9:14pm | IP Logged |
zerothinking wrote:
I apologize for the long post and if is is irrelevant and/or annoying then please PM
me and I will delete it. |
|
|
Your post is not overly long (I've read much longer, and often less informative, messages in this forum) nor is it irrelevant and/or annoying. The problem you described at the beginning is similar to one I've run across learning Dutch and Afrikaans; because they can sound, especially at first, so much like English. I was very frustrated once when I read that the Dutch diphthong "aa" should be made by opening my mouth very wide while pronouncing the letter "y" like in the the English word "by". The above explanation did not help me produce the correct sound and may have prevented me from hearing this diphthong correctly.
Also your initial impression of Finnish is spot on; the spelling is very phonetic, and only the "y" and "ö" sounds are unusual for English speakers, though the "y" sounds very much like the Dutch rounded "u".
Edited by mick33 on 22 May 2009 at 6:41pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| WFU03 Groupie Norway Joined 6677 days ago 62 posts - 70 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Norwegian, French
| Message 18 of 19 21 May 2009 at 10:21pm | IP Logged |
Of the languages I've studied, I would say German is pretty easy to pronounce and French isn't bad either after some practice. Norwegian is much harder, however, with the vowel sounds and some consonant clusters like "kj" consistently difficult.
1 person has voted this message useful
| kimchicurry Super Polyglot Newbie United States Joined 5997 days ago 12 posts - 29 votes Speaks: English, Cantonese*, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, Hindi, Spanish, Nepali, Urdu, Taiwanese, Shanghainese, Kannada, Gujarati Studies: Biblical Hebrew, Arabic (Egyptian), Sinhalese, Swahili, Vietnamese, Modern Hebrew, Arabic (Written), French, Persian, Bengali, Malay
| Message 19 of 19 24 May 2009 at 7:10am | IP Logged |
I'm personally having trouble with Hindi because of the retroflex/dental distinction and also a little bit because of the voiced aspirated series. Is there some trick to acquiring a mental phonemic distinction between the retroflex/dentals (like listen to the same sound repeated continuously for x number of months)? I can't even imagine starting to learn a Dravidian language like Malayalam which has retroflex, alveolar, AND dental all contrasting with each other. Two sets of Ds and Ts is enough for me.
Anyway, I have to say, at least most people who have some understanding of music should be able to catch on to the tones after a little bit. Also, non-tonal languages still use tones to convey feeling or mood at least, if not meaning. Therefore, I don't think tones is harder than the retroflex/alveolar/dental distinction for people who start out with a language which doesn't have either feature.
Also, I have trouble trilling my Rs (alveolar trill) as in Spanish or Italian. I can get the French R okay. I guess my tongue is just too tense.
Anyway, I'm real jealous of my Indian friends whose native languages (Hindi, Gujarati, etc.) already have so many consonants, and can pretty much pronounce anything without much trouble.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 19 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.4063 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|