Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Scandinavian languages and their dialects

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
39 messages over 5 pages: 13 4 5  Next >>
cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5840 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 9 of 39
30 April 2009 at 6:55pm | IP Logged 
Danish has less seriously strong accents than Sweden and Norway.

Norwegian is the language that both Danes and Swedes can easily understand without even focussing.

Both Sweden and Norway have large dialect differences between the North and ths South.

Danish and Swedish can occassionally get a bit hairy.
People who are used to hearing the other language say there is no problem, but personally I sometimes struggle to understand spoken Danish. Written is no problem though.


1 person has voted this message useful





Fasulye
Heptaglot
Winner TAC 2012
Moderator
Germany
fasulyespolyglotblog
Joined 5849 days ago

5460 posts - 6006 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: German*, DutchC1, EnglishB2, French, Italian, Spanish, Esperanto
Studies: Latin, Danish, Norwegian, Turkish
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 10 of 39
30 April 2009 at 7:25pm | IP Logged 
cordelia0507 wrote:
Danish has less seriously strong accents than Sweden and Norway.

Norwegian is the language that both Danes and Swedes can easily understand without even focussing.

Both Sweden and Norway have large dialect differences between the North and ths South.

Danish and Swedish can occassionally get a bit hairy.
People who are used to hearing the other language say there is no problem, but personally I sometimes struggle to understand spoken Danish. Written is no problem though.


These conclusions are also interesting for me to know, because I also intend to learn one Scandinavian language in the future. The decisive aspect for me (I will chose Danish) for me is that Denmark is a neighbouring country of Germany (I will have to spend my lifetime there anyway), so it's always useful to learn some "languages of the neigbours". Otherwise I would vote for Swedish because I think it's easier than Danish.

Fasulye-Babylonia

Edited by Fasulye on 01 May 2009 at 8:44am

1 person has voted this message useful



cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5840 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 11 of 39
30 April 2009 at 10:57pm | IP Logged 
@Fasulye: It's nice that you start with the language of a neighbouring country! I think that's a sound principle.

The grammar of the Scandinavian languages is more or less identical and the vocabulary is the same for most words, although the spelling and pronounciation varies.

If Scandinavians decided that they wanted to, we could probably have a language reform and come up with a pan-Scandinavian language. I think that would be really nice. More books would be translated and it would improve the standing of our language.

As it is right now, you hit a brick wall at university level where a lot of the literature simply isn't translated anymore, or published in English even when the author is a Scandinavian. This is the backside of small languages..
:-(

Edited by cordelia0507 on 30 April 2009 at 11:01pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Louis
Triglot
Groupie
Italy
Joined 5732 days ago

92 posts - 110 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian, Spanish

 
 Message 12 of 39
30 April 2009 at 11:08pm | IP Logged 
Don't be so quick to discredit Icelandic! I've been doing just fine with it, despite having never learned a language with cases or heavy inflections, as Iversen said. It's a really charming language with an "antique" aspect to it. While I can't say it's the most useful language, Icelandic is a great starting point for a future in the Scandinavian languages, and even the entire Germanic family!

The lack of resources isn't such a problem. I could PM you what I've been using, if you're curious.
1 person has voted this message useful



Tupiniquim
Senior Member
Brazil
Joined 6085 days ago

184 posts - 217 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*
Studies: English, Russian

 
 Message 13 of 39
30 April 2009 at 11:35pm | IP Logged 
.

Edited by Tupiniquim on 31 July 2009 at 11:04pm

1 person has voted this message useful





Fasulye
Heptaglot
Winner TAC 2012
Moderator
Germany
fasulyespolyglotblog
Joined 5849 days ago

5460 posts - 6006 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: German*, DutchC1, EnglishB2, French, Italian, Spanish, Esperanto
Studies: Latin, Danish, Norwegian, Turkish
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 14 of 39
01 May 2009 at 8:47am | IP Logged 
cordelia0507 wrote:
@Fasulye: It's nice that you start with the language of a neighbouring country! I think that's a sound principle.

As it is right now, you hit a brick wall at university level where a lot of the literature simply isn't translated anymore, or published in English even when the author is a Scandinavian. This is the backside of small languages.. :-(


That's not a good development that scientific publications in the Scandinavian languages are vanishing. Every language should also function on that level.

Fasulye-Babylonia

Edited by Fasulye on 01 May 2009 at 8:47am

1 person has voted this message useful



Alkeides
Senior Member
Bhutan
Joined 6150 days ago

636 posts - 644 votes 

 
 Message 15 of 39
01 May 2009 at 9:17am | IP Logged 
Are there any recent Latin academic publications in Scandinavia?

Latin Dissertations
1 person has voted this message useful



cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5840 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 16 of 39
01 May 2009 at 10:07am | IP Logged 
I think it might always have been this way with academic publications in Scandinavia, but I'm not completely sure.

German used to be the No 1 foreign language that Scandinavians spoke during the first half of the 20th century. All my grandparents speak good or fluent German (but with very strong accents!). There are some German books in their bookcases and I think it was a requirement for some professions that they could speak German.

But because of media and Hollywood, English has come in MUCH heavier than anything previously. The importance of English is drilled into everybody and there is no escaping English even if you wanted to.

I read an article about Kazakhstan: It took less than 60 years to turn the whole country around linguistically - people there speak better Russian than Kazakh, and those in the city often don't speak Kazakh at all. They say they prefer Russian.
I wonder if that's an example of what's to come... :-(


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 39 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 13 4 5  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3906 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.