27 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4 Next >>
Julie Heptaglot Senior Member PolandRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 6909 days ago 1251 posts - 1733 votes 5 sounds Speaks: Polish*, EnglishB2, GermanC2, SpanishB2, Dutch, Swedish, French
| Message 10 of 27 03 May 2009 at 2:54am | IP Logged |
Earle wrote:
Can't believe this oft-resurrected topic has proceeded thus far without anyone stating "A language is a dialect with an army and navy." Of course, that's not strictly true, but it could be modified to "A language is a dialect with political clout." |
|
|
Exactly what I wanted to write! And Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian make a good example of it. The dialect vs. language discussion may often have political significance and if so, the choice of one over the other may not have much to do with linguistics.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Earle Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 6321 days ago 276 posts - 276 votes Speaks: English*, German Studies: Norwegian, Spanish
| Message 11 of 27 03 May 2009 at 7:39am | IP Logged |
Quote:
And Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian make a good example of it. |
|
|
Julie, I was thinking of exactly that when I wrote. And when did Norwegian become a language, instead of a dialect(s)? Thinking about politics and dialect, I have a close friend and neighbor of several decades who spent her early life in what was then the Sudetenland. Their family name was "Mrazek," but they considered themselves German. I once remarked that their family name was probably the same as Jan Masaryk, the considered founder of the Czech nation. I'd characterize her reaction as indignation. Years later, after the latest round of Balkan troubles, the topic came up again. In the meantime, she'd found out that most of her family was Bosnian and was linguistically German only by accident. We are are all one race, originally out of Africa, and there are no bright lines between dialects and languages...
1 person has voted this message useful
| phouk Diglot Newbie Germany Joined 6044 days ago 28 posts - 48 votes Speaks: German*, English Studies: Russian
| Message 12 of 27 03 May 2009 at 9:20am | IP Logged |
Raistlin Majere wrote:
That depends: Fanatic, what kind of differences are there
between Schw�bisch and High German? Are they merely differences in vocabulary and
pronunciation, or do they also affect grammar? And, how big is the difference in both
kinds of written German? |
|
|
There are significant differences in grammar - if you are interested, have a
look at the grammar of the related bavarian dialect: http://www.bayrisch-lernen.de/
(choose "Grammatik" in the menu).
While there are for example books and plays written in Swabian or Bavarian, this is
the exception. Normally, written German is High German.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Chung Diglot Senior Member Joined 7162 days ago 4228 posts - 8259 votes 20 sounds Speaks: English*, French Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish
| Message 13 of 27 03 May 2009 at 9:20am | IP Logged |
Back to the original title of this thread, dialects CAN or CAN NOT count as languages. It depends on which communities we talk about.
At opposite ends we have Chinese and German "dialects" with low mutual intelligibility and Balkan "languages" with very high mutual intelligibility (Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Serbian form one group, Bulgarian and Macedonian form another group, Romanian and Moldavian form a third group).
1 person has voted this message useful
| minus273 Triglot Senior Member France Joined 5771 days ago 288 posts - 346 votes Speaks: Mandarin*, EnglishC2, French Studies: Ancient Greek, Tibetan
| Message 15 of 27 05 May 2009 at 12:42pm | IP Logged |
Raistlin Majere wrote:
That depends: Fanatic, what kind of differences are there between Schw�bisch and High German? Are they merely differences in vocabulary and pronunciation, or do they also affect grammar? And, how big is the difference in both kinds of written German?
If it's just vocabulary and pronunciation, Schw�bisch shuuld be regarded as just a dialect of German. On the other hand, if differences are really present in grammar too, then perhaps they are different languages.
However, I must agree with ElComadreja; that's cheating. |
|
|
But anyway, learning several Romance languages would be cheating too.
Are there any beeping differences between Italian and Spanish?
1 person has voted this message useful
| Volte Tetraglot Senior Member Switzerland Joined 6445 days ago 4474 posts - 6726 votes Speaks: English*, Esperanto, German, Italian Studies: French, Finnish, Mandarin, Japanese
| Message 16 of 27 05 May 2009 at 1:21pm | IP Logged |
minus273 wrote:
Raistlin Majere wrote:
That depends: Fanatic, what kind of differences are there between Schw�bisch and High German? Are they merely differences in vocabulary and pronunciation, or do they also affect grammar? And, how big is the difference in both kinds of written German?
If it's just vocabulary and pronunciation, Schw�bisch shuuld be regarded as just a dialect of German. On the other hand, if differences are really present in grammar too, then perhaps they are different languages.
However, I must agree with ElComadreja; that's cheating. |
|
|
But anyway, learning several Romance languages would be cheating too.
Are there any beeping differences between Italian and Spanish? |
|
|
Sure - if I try to talk to a Spaniard in Italian, he won't understand me.
The written languages are very similar (not identical - I can read Spanish newspapers, but Spanish novels are hard), but the spoken languages differ a bit more - both in pronunciation, and in colloquial words.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3750 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|