Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Norwegian Pitch Accent

 Language Learning Forum : Questions About Your Target Languages Post Reply
42 messages over 6 pages: 1 24 5 6  Next >>
Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6009 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 17 of 42
10 June 2011 at 12:12pm | IP Logged 
hrhenry wrote:
Arekkusu wrote:
If anyone has any link to any reference to the Norwegian tones, I'd really appreciate it.

There's a blurb in the wikipedia article on Norwegian phonology.

Personally, I think too much is made of the whole Norwegian tone subject. Context is king.

Context is a cowardly traitor.

Context often makes precision unnecessary, which means context doesn't encourage precision. If you want to learn a language well, you've got to learn it properly, and that means not relying on context.
3 persons have voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6580 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 18 of 42
10 June 2011 at 1:06pm | IP Logged 
tractor wrote:
Even when they belong to the same word class, such as the nouns T1 tanken meaning "the tank" and T2 tanken meaning "the thought", context will make the meaning clear. There are even dialects without pitch accent.

But what about the puns? The same distinction of "tanken" exists in Swedish and I regularly use it (probably too often) to make a cynical pun by using the common saying "Det är tanken som räknas" ("It's the thought that counts") by switching the tone to make it mean "It's the tank that counts" when discussing politics.

Puns are the sprinkles on the ice cream that is language.
2 persons have voted this message useful



hrhenry
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
languagehopper.blogs
Joined 5128 days ago

1871 posts - 3642 votes 
Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese
Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe

 
 Message 19 of 42
10 June 2011 at 4:09pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:

Context often makes precision unnecessary, which means context doesn't encourage precision. If you want to learn a language well, you've got to learn it properly, and that means not relying on context.

Define "precision" and "well" and "properly" for a language that can use pitch accent, but is not necessary within the Norwegian spectrum of speech as evidenced by various dialects. Because one dialect of the same language doesn't use pitch accent, that doesn't mean it's less precise or proper.

R.
==
1 person has voted this message useful



tractor
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 5451 days ago

1349 posts - 2292 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, Spanish, Catalan
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 20 of 42
10 June 2011 at 5:33pm | IP Logged 
Ari wrote:
But what about the puns? The same distinction of "tanken" exists in Swedish and I regularly use it
(probably too often) to make a cynical pun by using the common saying "Det är tanken som räknas" ("It's the
thought that counts") by switching the tone to make it mean "It's the tank that counts" when discussing
politics.

That pun doesn't work too well in Norwegian anyway. While tanke (= thought) and tank (= container) are
pronounced with a Norwegian a [a], tank (= armoured vehicle) is usually pronounced with an English a [æ].
Besides, some one-syllable English loanwords tend to be used with the English plural -s in Norwegian even when
used as a singular noun, and tank, meaning 'armoured vehicle' is one of those words. Thus, "it's the tanks that
counts" would be det er tanksen som teller instead of det er tanken som teller (different pitch, different
vowel ([æ] vs. [a]) and an additional consonant (-s-)).

Edited by tractor on 10 June 2011 at 5:38pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6009 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 21 of 42
10 June 2011 at 6:46pm | IP Logged 
hrhenry wrote:
Cainntear wrote:

Context often makes precision unnecessary, which means context doesn't encourage precision. If you want to learn a language well, you've got to learn it properly, and that means not relying on context.

Define "precision" and "well" and "properly" for a language that can use pitch accent, but is not necessary within the Norwegian spectrum of speech as evidenced by various dialects. Because one dialect of the same language doesn't use pitch accent, that doesn't mean it's less precise or proper.

I completely agree.
I wasn't arguing that learning pitch is necessary for learning Norwegian.

All I was saying is that it is a bad ideas to ignore something - anything - in a language simply because context can fill in the gaps.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6580 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 22 of 42
10 June 2011 at 9:30pm | IP Logged 
tractor wrote:
That pun doesn't work too well in Norwegian anyway.

Interesting! Thanks for sharing. Have a vote!
2 persons have voted this message useful



Aquila123
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Norway
mydeltapi.com
Joined 5304 days ago

201 posts - 262 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Finnish, Russian

 
 Message 23 of 42
21 June 2011 at 4:38pm | IP Logged 
The differnce between the tunes are like this in standard Norwegian:

Tune 1 - the accented syllable hava a low or law rising tune

Tune 2 - the accented syllable have a falling tune

In both cases an unaccented syllable have a high tune.

Tunes in verbs are mostly like this:

All monosyllabic forms have tune 1

The present tense of strong verbs have tune one

The present tense of weak verbs have tune 2 if disyllabic

Other disyllabic forms have tune 2

--------------------------------------

But there are some complications of which one is: When monosyllabic verb forms are followed by a monosyllabic adverb, you will often pronounce the combination as a disyllabic word with tune 2.

Example Gå ut - go out: Usually pronounced like gåut(2).


Edited by Aquila123 on 21 June 2011 at 10:40pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Camundonguinho
Triglot
Senior Member
Brazil
Joined 4747 days ago

273 posts - 500 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, English, Spanish
Studies: Swedish

 
 Message 24 of 42
25 May 2012 at 4:21pm | IP Logged 
In dialects it's easier, for example in Tromsø dialect,
all monosyllable verb forms have tone 1, and all 2-syllable verb forms have tone 2:

to throw
å kaste - kaste - kasta- ha kasta
(all pronounced with the tone 2, which is LHL in this dialect)


(source: An introduction to Norwegian dialects,
by Olaf Husby; Tapari akademisk forlag)

When people from Southern, Western and Northern Norway read a text in Bokmaal aloud, they do not copy the Oslo-style tones, rhythm and accent, but keep the tones from their own dialect.
People who strive too much to put on Eastern tones (some journalists) end up sounding flat (because tones in low tone dialects and tones in high tone dialects have completely opposite vocal shapes, and are neutralized in this way:

high tone dialects (Northern, Western, Southern Norway):
tone 1: HL; tone 2: LHL
Sentences are usually spoken with a falling intonation (as in English)

low tone dialects (Eastern and Central Norway (Trondheim)):
tone1: LH; tone: 2: HLH
Sentences are usually spoken with a rising intonation (''uptalk'')

(Uptalk in English:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_rising_terminal)

''In the United States, the phenomenon of HRT may be fairly recent but is an increasingly common characteristic of speech especially among younger speakers (see Ching, 1982 for one of the few accounts of HRT in American English). However, serious scientific/linguistic inquiry on this topic has a much more extensive history in linguistic journals from Australia, New Zealand, and Britain where HRT seems to have been noted as early as World War II.

It has been noted in speech heard in areas of Canada, in Cape Town, the Falkland Islands, and in the United States where it is often associated with a particular sociolect that originated among affluent teenage girls in Southern California (see Valleyspeak and Valley girl). Elsewhere in the United States, this intonation is characteristic of the speech heard in those parts of rural North Dakota and Minnesota that through migration have come under the influence of the Norwegian language.'')



Edited by Camundonguinho on 25 May 2012 at 4:34pm



2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 42 messages over 6 pages: << Prev 1 24 5 6  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4688 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.