Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Are polysynthetic languages doomed?

 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
24 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3  Next >>
yenome
Hexaglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 5375 days ago

37 posts - 45 votes
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Russian, French, Persian
Studies: Thai, Arabic (Iraqi), Mandarin

 
 Message 1 of 24
29 March 2010 at 3:30am | IP Logged 
I've been looking for information on all the polysynthetic languages I can find, and so far every one of them has either been dead or dying (or not completely polysynthetic). Does anyone know if there's a polysynthetic language which is still robust? It would be quite unfortunate if this wonderful class of languages died out.
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6769 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 2 of 24
29 March 2010 at 3:41am | IP Logged 
Greenlandic/Inuit seems to be in pretty good shape.
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6704 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 3 of 24
29 March 2010 at 1:11pm | IP Logged 
The Inuit language is spoken by the Inuit themselves, but the number of Danes who learn it even after years on Greenland seems to be extremely small. The basic problem with polysynthetic languages could be that they are difficult to learn for morphology-scared outsiders, and that they therefore never have been able to spread to large populations. Languages with less extreme morphologies are spoken and learnt by many learners (German and Russian), while English which has an extremely reduced morphology is being adopted cheerfully all over the planet (even though it is a mess in all other respects). So the ability to spread does seem to be correlated with the complexity of the morphology, which is the main factor behind the initial steepness of the learning curve.

Just to illustrate what we are speaking about I'll quote this description of the Eskimo-Aleutic languages:


Every word must have only one root (free morpheme) always at the beginning.[5] Eskimo-Aleut languages have a relatively small number of roots - in the case of Central Alaskan Yup'ik around two thousand.[6] Following the root are a number of postbases, which are bound morphemes that add to the basic meaning of the root. If the meaning of the postbase is to be expressed alone, a special neutral root (in the case of Central Alaskan Yup'ik pi) is used.

Following the postbases are non-lexical suffixes that indicate case on nouns and person and mood on verbs. The number of cases varies, with Aleut languages having a greatly reduced case system compared to Eskimo. The Eskimo languages are ergative-absolutive in nouns and in Yup'ik languages, also in verbal person marking. All Eskimo-Aleut languages have obligatory verbal agreement with agent and patient in transitive clauses, and there are special suffixes used for this purpose in subordinate clauses, which makes these languages, like most in the North Pacific, highly complement deranking.

At the end of a word there can be one of a small number of clitics with meanings such as "but" or indicating a polar interrogative.



Edited by Iversen on 31 March 2010 at 11:37am

4 persons have voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6769 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 4 of 24
30 March 2010 at 3:23pm | IP Logged 
Even if very few foreigners learn Greenlandic/Inuit (by which I include the Canadian dialects), I imagine it has
enough going on, including number of speakers and cultural output, to be considered "robust" and worthy of
learning for a polyglot.
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5382 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 5 of 24
30 March 2010 at 3:36pm | IP Logged 
Quechua?

The line between agglutinative and polysynthetic is very blurry.
2 persons have voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6704 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 6 of 24
31 March 2010 at 2:41pm | IP Logged 
By definition agglutinative languages just concatenate the bits and pieces to long strings, while the polysynthetic ones mix the elements up so that the endings have several roles (and being "poly" they tag one element to the other until the whole thing becomes almost impossible to analyse).

In practice the line is blurred because many language do both things. For instance Russian behaves like an agglutinative language with its prefixes and the postfixes that mark aspect, while the endings mark it as a synthetic language.


Edited by Iversen on 11 May 2010 at 1:03pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Makrasiroutioun
Quadrilingual Heptaglot
Senior Member
Canada
infowars.com
Joined 6107 days ago

210 posts - 236 votes 
Speaks: French*, English*, Armenian*, Romanian*, Latin, German, Italian
Studies: Dutch, Swedish, Turkish, Japanese, Russian, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 7 of 24
11 May 2010 at 6:38am | IP Logged 
The Cree-Ojibwe-Innu (Montagnais) continuum is by far the most spoken Native language in Canada, and for many communities it's still going strong. It's typically Algonquian, so that's textbook polysynthetic!
1 person has voted this message useful



maaku
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5575 days ago

359 posts - 562 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 8 of 24
12 May 2010 at 5:15am | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:

At the end of a word there can be one of a small number of clitics with meanings such as "but" or indicating a polar interrogative.

Is that what they call the interrogative near the arctic circle?


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 24 messages over 3 pages: 2 3  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.