Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

What causes languages to simplify?

  Tags: Morphology | History
 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
33 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5  Next >>
chucknorrisman
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5449 days ago

321 posts - 435 votes 
Speaks: Korean*, English, Spanish
Studies: Russian, Mandarin, Lithuanian, French

 
 Message 1 of 33
28 June 2010 at 1:39am | IP Logged 
If you compare many of the older languages to modern languages, you will see that the modern languages often are simpler grammatically. What causes these simplifications in grammar? I don't think the modern people are any less intelligent than the people of back then, so what could be the cause?
1 person has voted this message useful



Ubik
Senior Member
United States
ubykh.wordpress.com/
Joined 5317 days ago

147 posts - 176 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Latin, Arabic (Egyptian), German, Spanish

 
 Message 2 of 33
28 June 2010 at 2:13am | IP Logged 
Ive always wondered the same thing, but from the opposite angle: why is it that the
further back in time you go languages seem to be more complex? One would think that a
culture who (presumably) didnt even write (or at least not as prolifically as later
generations) couldnt keep track of all that stuff or teach it to their children
effectively and therefore would create a simple language to get basic ideas across and as
times changed, inventions came along, etc then it could gradually get more complex.

For some reason, perhaps like you, I envision things getting more complicated as opposed
to more relaxed as time goes on. Just as the law books keep getting thicker and
thicker...
1 person has voted this message useful



dolly
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5791 days ago

191 posts - 376 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Latin

 
 Message 3 of 33
28 June 2010 at 2:24am | IP Logged 
The standard theory is that a language loses its complexity through contact with people who speak other languages. Languages are simplified to make them easier to learn, which facilitates communication, and that's good for business. But I'm sure there's more to it. I'm simplifying.

Another theory is that cultures get stupider over time.

Edited by dolly on 28 June 2010 at 2:26am

2 persons have voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6944 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 4 of 33
28 June 2010 at 2:28am | IP Logged 
There is a book by Guy Deutscher called "The Unfolding of Language - An Evolutionary Tour of Mainkind's Greatest Invention". It was recommended to me in an old thread on the same topic as this one.

It appears that the "politically correct" answer is that languages simplify in some respects while becoming more complicated in others. For example, English didn't used to have continuous tenses ("I am reading") nor used "do" as an auxiliary verb ("I know not" instead of the current "I do not know").

I am not sure I am convinced, but that's the mantra.


Edited by frenkeld on 28 June 2010 at 3:44am

5 persons have voted this message useful





budonoseito
Pro Member
United States
budobeyondtechnRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5806 days ago

261 posts - 344 votes 
Studies: French, Japanese
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 5 of 33
28 June 2010 at 2:31am | IP Logged 
I think the written language would cause simplification through standardization. When
people and language were more isolated, they would have different pronunciation and
grammar. As travel became easier, standardization occurred to communicate more
effectively. My theory anyway.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Ubik
Senior Member
United States
ubykh.wordpress.com/
Joined 5317 days ago

147 posts - 176 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Latin, Arabic (Egyptian), German, Spanish

 
 Message 6 of 33
28 June 2010 at 5:14am | IP Logged 
frenkeld wrote:
There is Mankinds-Invention/dp/0805080120/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books& qid=1277684661&sr=8-1">a
book
by Guy Deutscher called "The Unfolding of Language - An Evolutionary Tour of
Mainkind's Greatest Invention". It was recommended to me in an old thread on the same
topic as this one.

It appears that the "politically correct" answer is that languages simplify in some
respects while becoming more complicated in others. For example, English didn't used to
have continuous tenses ("I am reading") nor used "do" as an auxiliary verb ("I know
not" instead of the current "I do not know").



Thanks for the suggestion. This is so far a great read. Ill be picking up a copy from
the library tomorrow.
1 person has voted this message useful



Kazen
Diglot
Groupie
Japan
japanese-me.com
Joined 5329 days ago

96 posts - 133 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese

 
 Message 7 of 33
28 June 2010 at 8:21am | IP Logged 
This is only a small part of language, but I read somewhere that irregular verbs tend to regularize over time. Why? Because irregular verbs are a pain. -_^

Quick, what's the past tense of "dive", as in "dive into a pool"?

The old, "correct" answer is "dove", an irregular form. Many people say "dived", though, and according to Webster it's just as valid. I even heard it during the last Summer Olympics.

So I guess I'm saying that languages simplify because it makes them simpler. ^_^;;
1 person has voted this message useful



chirel
Triglot
Senior Member
Finland
Joined 5311 days ago

125 posts - 159 votes 
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish
Studies: French

 
 Message 8 of 33
28 June 2010 at 10:51am | IP Logged 
The grammar (at least when it comes to Finnish morphology) seems to be getting simpler because most learners
don't learn rare forms well (or rules for them) well. A child picks up things one at a time and creates his own
rules/theories. The he applies these rules to other things analoguously and makes mistakes. After having made
the same mistake often enough and having heard the correct form, he learns a new rule and starts to apply it. It's
an exception to the first rule. In this way the child fine tunes the rules for morfology and syntax, but he might
never really learn the rarest forms and thus uses the analoguous form. If many people start to use the same
analoguous for, then it becomes the rule.

A rare form could be something that is not used often or it could be a group of words significally smaller than
other similar groups.

Some elements in language are always disappearing and some getting stronger and new elements are introdused
or created. In Finnish you might be able to say approximately how old some words are if you recognize the suffix
they were created with, because at certain times some suffixes are more fashionable (or productive) than others.
The new and fashionable elements might also replace some old ones and may spread quickly. The result is that
something else becomes rare and might be more difficult to learn, and the process continues.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 33 messages over 5 pages: 2 3 4 5  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.