Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Truly monosyllabic languages

  Tags: Pronunciation
 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
chucknorrisman
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5449 days ago

321 posts - 435 votes 
Speaks: Korean*, English, Spanish
Studies: Russian, Mandarin, Lithuanian, French

 
 Message 1 of 4
07 July 2010 at 6:23pm | IP Logged 
Do they exist as spoken languages anymore? Are there any truly monosyllabic languages that can express abstract and technical ideas with one syllable words?
1 person has voted this message useful



Gareth
Groupie
United States
Joined 5459 days ago

51 posts - 67 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Cherokee, French

 
 Message 2 of 4
07 July 2010 at 8:11pm | IP Logged 
I don't know of any natural langs like that, however Speedtalkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedtalk (a theorized conlang) might be what you seek.
1 person has voted this message useful



indiana83
Groupie
United States
ipracticecanto.wordp
Joined 5491 days ago

92 posts - 121 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Cantonese, Italian

 
 Message 3 of 4
07 July 2010 at 8:26pm | IP Logged 
Cantonese is not monosyllabic, but it definitely has a larger portion of monosyllabic words than you might be used to in Mandarin. Mandarin has fewer tones, so must rely more heavily on disyllabic words:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_language#Phonology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_language#Grammar_and_mo rphology
1 person has voted this message useful



furrykef
Senior Member
United States
furrykef.com/
Joined 6473 days ago

681 posts - 862 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, Latin, Italian

 
 Message 4 of 4
08 July 2010 at 1:36am | IP Logged 
Classical Chinese, while obviously no longer in current use, is almost completely monosyllabic. There are some compound words, but they are rare. Classical Chinese was actually used in writing right up to the 20th century (more correctly called Literary Chinese after the Classical period).

It's not clear how much of this is because written Chinese is abbreviated (the logographic writing system allows you to cut out a lot of unnecessary syllables) and how much is because spoken Chinese at the time really was monosyllabic. We can only look at ancient spoken Chinese through a distorted lens, to say the least.

Edited by furrykef on 08 July 2010 at 1:37am



2 persons have voted this message useful



If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2813 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.