Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

PRC further simplifies hanzi

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
ennime
Tetraglot
Senior Member
South Africa
universityofbrokengl
Joined 5906 days ago

397 posts - 507 votes 
Speaks: English, Dutch*, Esperanto, Afrikaans
Studies: Xhosa, French, Korean, Portuguese, Zulu

 
 Message 1 of 7
17 August 2009 at 4:34pm | IP Logged 
Apparently a new list of further simplifications was published by the PRC... I can't
read chinese but here is the news article.

04/09/content_11154357.htm">http://news.xinhuanet.com/focus/ 2009-
04/09/content_11154357.htm


Out of curiosity, does anybody has more info? how extensive is this revision? and any
opinions?

I'm not asking for a traditional vs. simplified discussion, just answer on this
particular revision please! let's not kick a dead horse, the poor thing is dead, let it
rest in peace... ^_^
1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6013 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 2 of 7
17 August 2009 at 4:41pm | IP Logged 
Uh-oh... the Unicode standards committee are going to be kept busy....
;-)

But more seriously: the news in English from Xinhua.
1 person has voted this message useful



pmiller
Account terminated
Groupie
Canada
Joined 5676 days ago

99 posts - 104 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 3 of 7
17 August 2009 at 10:13pm | IP Logged 
Where is the dead horse? I don't see it. (I just want to make sure it really is dead :)
1 person has voted this message useful



Nick_dm
Newbie
United Kingdom
Joined 5715 days ago

24 posts - 26 votes
Speaks: English*
Studies: Cantonese

 
 Message 4 of 7
17 August 2009 at 10:37pm | IP Logged 
Ennime, I'm not sure that describing this as "further simplification" is accurate. I haven't read about it in detail
but in the article Cainntear linked to someone involved was quoted as saying "one of the problems we are trying
to address here is over-simplification of some characters".

An article in The
Economist in April claimed that "some characters will have more strokes added and thus be brought closer to
their earlier, more complicated forms".

Edited by Nick_dm on 17 August 2009 at 10:45pm

1 person has voted this message useful



pmiller
Account terminated
Groupie
Canada
Joined 5676 days ago

99 posts - 104 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 5 of 7
17 August 2009 at 11:21pm | IP Logged 
So backtracking then. I figured as much. As China grows wealthier it will feel increasing pride in its traditional culture, and will probably go back to traditional characters altogether. The additional complexity doesn't stop Taiwanese and other overseas Chinese from attaining literacy; why should it be any different for mainland Chinese?
1 person has voted this message useful



ennime
Tetraglot
Senior Member
South Africa
universityofbrokengl
Joined 5906 days ago

397 posts - 507 votes 
Speaks: English, Dutch*, Esperanto, Afrikaans
Studies: Xhosa, French, Korean, Portuguese, Zulu

 
 Message 6 of 7
18 August 2009 at 1:01am | IP Logged 
Nick_dm wrote:
Ennime, I'm not sure that describing this as "further simplification"
is accurate. I haven't read about it in detail
but in the article Cainntear linked to someone involved was quoted as saying "one of
the problems we are trying
to address here is over-simplification of some characters".

An id=13528023">article in The
Economist in April claimed that "some characters will have more strokes added and thus
be brought closer to
their earlier, more complicated forms".


Ah the further simplification was mentioned on wikipedia (main page, news box) ergo I
took a tiny step and there conclusions were... perhaps not the best reasoning from my
part ^_^
1 person has voted this message useful



Yukamina
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 6266 days ago

281 posts - 332 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Japanese, Korean, French

 
 Message 7 of 7
18 August 2009 at 6:10pm | IP Logged 
It sounds like they are adding to the number of simplified characters. As in, less common characters that didn't have a simplified form before will have one now.


1 person has voted this message useful



If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5781 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.