Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Has French changed much since Napoleon?

  Tags: History | French
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
14 messages over 2 pages: 1 2 
vanityx3
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6464 days ago
331 posts - 326 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Spanish, Japanese

 
 Message 9 of 14
08 April 2008 at 8:02am | IP Logged 
Here is a lot of good insight written by native speakers mostly.

Has french changed much in the last 100 years

Not only has French not changed much since Napoléon. It hasn't changed much since Molière. Molière was writing his plays only 40-50 years after Shakespeare but Molière's French seems much more modern than Shakespeare's English.

Sure, Molière uses a word or two that is dated, as does Shakespeare. But the syntax and grammar of Molière's sentences is almost identical to modern French.

Edited by vanityx3 on 08 April 2008 at 9:25am
1 person has voted this message useful



Makrasiroutioun
Quadrilingual Heptaglot
Senior Member
Canada
infowars.com
Joined 6109 days ago
210 posts - 236 votes 
Speaks: French*, English*, Armenian*, Romanian*, Latin, German, Italian
Studies: Dutch, Swedish, Turkish, Japanese, Russian, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 10 of 14
08 April 2008 at 10:21am | IP Logged 
A word or two? I'd be impressed if you can find an average 16 year old English speaker who can understand more than 50% of Shakespeare!

As for Molière... that really isn't a problem for any French schoolboy or schoolgirl. We were doing reading and analysing Molière's plays in middle school. You'll have to go back in time a bit more for the mutual intelligibility to decrease (think Pantagruel!)
1 person has voted this message useful



vanityx3
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6464 days ago
331 posts - 326 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Spanish, Japanese

 
 Message 11 of 14
09 April 2008 at 8:39am | IP Logged 
Makrasiroutioun wrote:
A word or two? I'd be impressed if you can find an average 16 year old English speaker who can understand more than 50% of Shakespeare!

As for Molière... that really isn't a problem for any French schoolboy or schoolgirl. We were doing reading and analysing Molière's plays in middle school. You'll have to go back in time a bit more for the mutual intelligibility to decrease (think Pantagruel!)


I think most 16 year old English speakers would know 75-80% at least of Shakepeare, if he is writing in prose instead of poetry. His prose isn't hard to understand, but his poetry is, especially since he like to play with words a lot, sometimes using common words to have sexual overtones.


I think most 16 year old French speakers could understand 95% or more of Molière though.
1 person has voted this message useful



vilas
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Italy
Joined 6963 days ago
531 posts - 722 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, Italian*, English, French, Portuguese

 
 Message 12 of 14
21 July 2009 at 9:29pm | IP Logged 
I have read that Napoleon had to learn French before entering the school, but he spoke with a marked Italian (Corsican is an central Italian dialect ) accent throughout his life and never learned to spell properly.
1 person has voted this message useful



dmg
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
dgryski.blogspot.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 7014 days ago
555 posts - 605 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Dutch, Esperanto

 
 Message 13 of 14
22 July 2009 at 2:24am | IP Logged 
From "The Story of French", by Jean-Benoît Nadeau and Julie Barlow:

Quote:

In 1835 the French Academy published the sixth edition of its Dictionnaire, which got its usual lukewarm reception. However, partly because of Guizot's influence, th French government decided at this time that candidates for the civil service had to pas written and oral tests. That meant that the government needed a standard, so it turned to the French Academy. This was the first (and only) time the work of the Academy took on a genuinely official character and, predictably, this became the heyday of its influence. Lexicographers even published unauthorized versions of the Academy's dictionary on their own. In 1836 and 1837 no fewer than four of this abridged (basically bootleg) editions of the dictionary came out. Joining the movement, publishers edited and republished the classic French authors, including Molière, Racine, and La Fontaine, with the new, official spellings. Ever since then, francophones have entertained the myth that classic French authors wrote exactly like the French bourgeois of 1830. This linguistic revisionism fed (and still feeds) a quasi-religious belief among francophones that the French language has been fixé (set) set the time of Louis XIV. That's patently false, but most French speakers and many foreigners believe it.



This is a fascinating book and a must-read for anybody studying French.

1 person has voted this message useful



Belardur
Octoglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5614 days ago
148 posts - 195 votes 
Speaks: English*, GermanC2, Spanish, Dutch, Latin, Ancient Greek, French, Lowland Scots
Studies: Biblical Hebrew, Italian, Arabic (Written), Mandarin, Korean

 
 Message 14 of 14
22 July 2009 at 8:43am | IP Logged 
vanityx3 wrote:
Makrasiroutioun wrote:
A word or two? I'd be impressed if you can find an average 16 year old English speaker who can understand more than 50% of Shakespeare!

As for Molière... that really isn't a problem for any French schoolboy or schoolgirl. We were doing reading and analysing Molière's plays in middle school. You'll have to go back in time a bit more for the mutual intelligibility to decrease (think Pantagruel!)


I think most 16 year old English speakers would know 75-80% at least of Shakepeare, if he is writing in prose instead of poetry. His prose isn't hard to understand, but his poetry is, especially since he like to play with words a lot, sometimes using common words to have sexual overtones.


I think most 16 year old French speakers could understand 95% or more of Molière though.


I think you're both wrong about 16 year old English speakers. I think you'd find that the average 21 year old English speaker can't understand Shakespeare alone. Has read it in school, yes. Has read about it, yes. Has had it explained by a teacher, perhaps. Can read it in isolation, with any level of comfort? Probably not (note: average, not by any means all).


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 14 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1 2 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.