Rosetta Stone Quality (Language Programs, Books & Tapes) Language Learning Forum

Rosetta Stone Quality
Tags: Rosetta Stone \| Usefulness \| Learning Technique/Method
Share with: Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon
Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes

34 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Lemanensis
Bilingual Pentaglot
Groupie
Switzerland
hebrew.ecott.ch
Joined 5930 days ago
73 posts - 77 votes

Speaks: French*, English*, German, Spanish, Swedish
Studies: Modern Hebrew

Message 33 of 34

30 September 2008 at 3:23pm | IP Logged

txag2005 wrote:

I guess my main contention is Rosetta Stone is marketed and seen by many and the end all be all of language learning. I also do not believe it is worth the extremely high price tag (neither is Pimsleur likely). For $500-1000 I would think the software should be powerful enough to bring a learner close to fluency by the end, and I dont feel Rosetta Stone delivers at all in regards to that.

Fluency in a foreign language for $1000 ??? I don't think that's very realistic.
I'm using Pimsleur for Hebrew and I'm pleased with the value for money - just over $5 per 30-minute lesson, and it's getting me to talk with a fair degree of confidence on the subjects covered so it's a helpful aid in addition to my more conventional teaching manual - which has far fewer useful phrases in it that I could use immediately - although it has things like 'computer' 'cell phone' 'cordless phone' and 'hands-free phone' as well as 'there are hotties on the beach'!! LOL
1 person has voted this message useful

This discussion contains 34 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register

Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This page was generated in 0.3590 seconds.