Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Xenegram

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
13 messages over 2 pages: 1
TerryW
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6155 days ago

370 posts - 783 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 9 of 13
08 April 2011 at 11:50pm | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
It's just numerology... and people who believed in it were easy to recognize because they changed the spelling of their names in strange ways.


Singer Dionne Warwick, who just "got fired" from Donald Trump's "Celebrity Apprentice" the other week, once had an astrologer (Linda Goodman, author of "Love Signs") tell her that she should add an "E" to her name (as in "Warwicke") for numerological reasons.

When she took that advice (put it on album covers, etc.) she had all kinds of bad luck happen, so she took the "E" back off.

From her autobiography (see middle of page 81):
D. Warwick autobiography
1 person has voted this message useful



JW
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/egw
Joined 5920 days ago

1802 posts - 2011 votes 
22 sounds
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Ancient Greek, French, Biblical Hebrew
Studies: Luxembourgish, Dutch, Greek, Italian

 
 Message 10 of 13
09 April 2011 at 1:35am | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
It's just numerology under a new name - i.e. the idea that a name can be converted into a number, that has some hidden meaning. That thing was popular some years ago, and people who believed in it were easy to recognize because they changed the spelling of their names in strange ways.

This is an ancient Hebrew concept called גימטריה‎ (Gematria). In Biblical Hebrew there are no numbers, the letters double as numbers. Thus letters of any word can be added together. Ancient Greek also had Germatria thus the Bible verse:

This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666. Rev 13:18.

666 in Ancient Greek is χξϛ where:

χ = 600
ξ = 60
ϛ =   6
Total = 666

Some have tried to say that Nero was the Antichrist since his name in Aramaic is נרון קסר (neron qasar "nun" "resh" "waw" "nun" "qoph" "samek" "resh") thus

nun = 50
resh = 200
waw = 6
nun = 50
qoph = 100
samek = 60
resh = 200
Total = 666

However this is bogus because the book of Revelation was written after Nero died.





Edited by JW on 09 April 2011 at 1:37am

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 5809 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 11 of 13
09 April 2011 at 1:58am | IP Logged 
Not only that, but a particularly well-researched translation of the Bible has a footnote saying that 666 is probably wrong, and the original was more likely 616.
2 persons have voted this message useful



JW
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/egw
Joined 5920 days ago

1802 posts - 2011 votes 
22 sounds
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Ancient Greek, French, Biblical Hebrew
Studies: Luxembourgish, Dutch, Greek, Italian

 
 Message 12 of 13
09 April 2011 at 2:31am | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
Not only that, but a particularly well-researched translation of the Bible has a footnote saying that 666 is probably wrong, and the original was more likely 616.

Yes, but this is a minority variant based on a very small number of manuscripts. If you check all the English translations and translations into other languages (at least the ones I can read), all have 666. 616 only rates a footnote.

Also, 666 is a very descriptive number in Biblical Numerology, 6 being the number of Man and 3 being the number of completion and entirety. Thus 666 is Man in complete and entire rebellion against God: The Antichrist.

Also the Greek of Rev 13:18 reads:

ἀριθμὸς γὰρ ἀνθρώπου ἐστιν
arithmos gar anthropou estin

which means "for (it) is the number of man" which is 6 not 1.

Edited by JW on 09 April 2011 at 2:32am

1 person has voted this message useful



leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6348 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 13 of 13
10 April 2011 at 1:34am | IP Logged 
Obviously It was not meant to be taken literally, it
refers to any manufacturers of dairy products.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 13 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5625 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.