Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

French Assimil Disappointment

  Tags: Assimil | French
 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
34 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5  Next >>
Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5141 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 1 of 34
25 March 2010 at 12:47am | IP Logged 
A friend of mine (L1 Japanese, L2 English) just started studying French and is using
the Assimil method (most recent anglophone version, with CDs). I'm actually the one
that recommended it, what with all the good reviews it got here.

However, going over the first lesson with her, I'm disappointed. It's a bunch of
disconnected, meaningless dribble. I might sound a tad bit harsh, but it's just that
when I start studying a language, I want to know how to make a sentence, where words
go, how they connect, etc., and that lesson did nothing to help anyone make a
sentence. Ok, it's the first lesson, but still... I wasn't impressed. If I was studying
French, I'd look elsewhere, I think.

Do I need to be more patient or am I not the only one to think that way?



Edited by Arekkusu on 25 March 2010 at 2:29am

1 person has voted this message useful



maecenas
Diglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 5309 days ago

21 posts - 44 votes
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: French, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 2 of 34
25 March 2010 at 1:30am | IP Logged 
I don't really want to be too harsh, but passing such critical judgment after just 1 lesson seems incredibly severe.

I've been working my way through it (currently on lesson 49), and I'm enjoying it quite a bit. Now, it's not my first contact with the French language- actually far from it. I've done Michel Thomas, Linguaphone Alltalk, and a few basic classes. With that background I feel like it's doing a terrific job of helping me "fill in the gaps" of basic vocabulary and sentence structure. I also have a background in romance languages with latin and Italian, so I might take to it much differently than someone from a different background.

So, I'd say stick with it for a bit. The first lesson obviously shows the style they use for the book, and it's fair to leave room for the idea that it just might not be the style for you/her. However, I feel that lessons aren't as disjoint as they might initially seem- there's a definite "method to the madness" in the sense that they effectively introduce concepts on a gradient. And with the shortness of the lessons, your friend won't lose too much time working through the first 15 or so and then re-evaluating how she feels.
1 person has voted this message useful



Arekkusu
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Canada
bit.ly/qc_10_lec
Joined 5141 days ago

3971 posts - 7747 votes 
Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto
Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian

 
 Message 3 of 34
25 March 2010 at 1:37am | IP Logged 
Thanks for the feedback.
1 person has voted this message useful



pfwillard
Pro Member
United States
Joined 5459 days ago

169 posts - 205 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 4 of 34
25 March 2010 at 2:12am | IP Logged 
Assimil is weird but that might be a good thing, if it can be endured to completion. I would use a more traditional grammar/reader alongside it.
1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 6916 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 5 of 34
25 March 2010 at 2:27am | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
A friend of mine (L1 Japanese, L2 English) just started studying French and is using
the Assimil method (most recent anglophone version, with CDs). I'm actually the one
that recommended it, what with all the good reviews it got here.

However, going over the first lesson with her, I'm disappointed. It's a bunch of
disconnected, meaningless dribble. I might sound a tad bit harsh, but it's just that
when I start studying a language, I want to know how to make a sentence, where words
go, how they connect, etc., and that lesson did nothing to help anything make a
sentence. Ok, it's the first lesson, but still... I wasn't impressed. If I was studying
French, I'd look elsewhere, I think.

Do I need to be more patient or am I not the only one to think that way?



I got a similar impression when using Assimil with Ease for Hungarian many years ago. I stuck with it for 17 lessons following the instructions to spend 30 min. per day on a lesson. After that I got rid of it. I just wasn't absorbing anything with its attractive-sounding but ultimately questionable teaching method. The dialogues can be funny and have some handy idiomatic expressions, but I'm like you in that I also like to know what's going on so that I can learn how to build my own sentences / express myself in the target language without being shunted into using the book's sentences (i.e. some more explanations on grammar and MORE exercises please).
1 person has voted this message useful



spanishlearner
Groupie
France
Joined 5214 days ago

51 posts - 81 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*

 
 Message 6 of 34
25 March 2010 at 2:47am | IP Logged 
That's why I would never use Assimil when starting a language, for which the old "grammar-translation" method is far superior in my opinion. I like to methodically learn the basic building blocks of a language in isolation and progress step by step; I want to know what the function of each word is rather than memorize whole sentences. Assimil is more useful for intermediate learners to practice and refine what they have learnt elsewhere.

Edited by spanishlearner on 25 March 2010 at 2:50am

2 persons have voted this message useful



delectric
Diglot
Senior Member
China
Joined 6941 days ago

608 posts - 733 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin
Studies: German

 
 Message 7 of 34
25 March 2010 at 3:15am | IP Logged 
I think if you've never learnt a language before then something like 'Pimsleur' might
seem more rewarding. You'll feel that you're actually learning something in the sense
that you'll have immediate output in the form of speech at the end of the lesson.
That's how I started Chinese Mandarin. I thought Pimsleur was amazing at that time.
But, now after developing my language learning techniques and knowing a lot more about
the process of learning a language I'll never start a language with Pimsleur. I'm an
Assimil man all the way now.

I'm doing French with Ease (Windows Mobile - mobi reader version). I also use it with a
pocket version of Supermemo and a program that lets me cut of audio files. This way the
whole learning process is mobile. Sure I'm not saying much in French at the moment (I'm
only on lesson 22 right now). But I can certainly understand more words and my passive
vocabulary and understanding is much greater than it would have been had I used
Pimsleur. If you need to learn a few phrases to get by in a short period of time then
Pimsleur is the best. If you want to LEARN a language then you'll know you'll need
quite a bit of time anyway and so Assimil is the best. Feels like a natural way to
study for me.

My advice is to stick with it and don't give yourself any pressure about
speaking/output at least until you are comfortably on lesson 50. Good luck.
1 person has voted this message useful



fanatic
Octoglot
Senior Member
Australia
speedmathematics.com
Joined 6906 days ago

1152 posts - 1817 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, French, Afrikaans, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Dutch
Studies: Swedish, Norwegian, Polish, Modern Hebrew, Malay, Mandarin, Esperanto

 
 Message 8 of 34
25 March 2010 at 4:23am | IP Logged 
Arekkusu wrote:
A friend of mine (L1 Japanese, L2 English) just started studying French and is using
the Assimil method (most recent anglophone version, with CDs). I'm actually the one
that recommended it, what with all the good reviews it got here.

However, going over the first lesson with her, I'm disappointed. It's a bunch of
disconnected, meaningless dribble. I might sound a tad bit harsh, but it's just that
when I start studying a language, I want to know how to make a sentence, where words
go, how they connect, etc., and that lesson did nothing to help anyone make a
sentence. Ok, it's the first lesson, but still... I wasn't impressed. If I was studying French, I'd look elsewhere, I think.

Do I need to be more patient or am I not the only one to think that way?



No Assimil is not a bunch of disconnected, meaningless dribble.

I learnt German from the beginning with Assimil German Without Toil. I had never learnt any German elsewhere. I spent between half an hour a day to up to 45 minutes, always broken up into several sessions. I was conversing in German in less than a month. I was fluent enough after six months to work in Germany and make technical translations.

I have around 14 Assimil language courses and like them all except two.

I think the problem is not with the Assimil courses but how you like to learn. Assimil suits my learning style. You may have to adapt your learning style to make good use of Assimil but it is possible.

It would be harsh to say that the Assimil courses are no good. They are excellent and do what they claim. As I say, they don't suit everyone's learning style. (Check out the thread.)

The same goes for FSI and Pimsleur. They don't suit my learning style. I have made use of both and they do what they promise.

I believe that Assimil is a natural way to learn a language. It is pleasant and effective. If you don't like it, don't use it. Try FSI for free and see how you like it. Try Pimsleur.

Many of us have used Assimil effectively and succeeded. Try it using the method they suggest. Work through the passive stage without worrying about what you have learnt or whether you have memorised the vocabulary or understood the grammar. Half an hour on each lesson is probably enough. Break that half hour up into segments no longer than 10 minutes. Review old lessons when you can.

Then, when you begin the active stage you will find it easy and you will see you have learnt a lot.

I see no reason to use another course to get a basic knowledge before beginning Assimil. I have learnt a number of languages using Assimil as my only resource to begin and I have found it to be effective.

Some have written that they have tried Assimil but used it according to their own methods and then said it didn't work. They didn't try it the way the course was designed to work.


26 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 34 messages over 5 pages: 2 3 4 5  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4375 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.