Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Michel Thomas - where are they now?

 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
26 messages over 4 pages: 13 4  Next >>
magictom123
Senior Member
United KingdomRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5605 days ago

272 posts - 365 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Italian, French

 
 Message 9 of 26
16 April 2010 at 9:39am | IP Logged 
Ichiro wrote:
Some other products offer fully scripted classroom-style exchanges, I
think in imitation of Michel Thomas but attempting to control the process more. The
results are really painful to listen to because so artificial, and difficult to learn
from.


Indeed, the Michel Thomas Vocab courses headed this way where Rose Le Hayden 'teaches'
vocab to native speakers, whose responses seem to have been pasted in. Quite
ridiculous and spoils the authenticity of the course.

I original MT courses I've look at have been excellent, and despite the complaints
people have about the students, they never really distracted me (well, maybe the
annoying lady on the French Foudation course with her ohh la la's but even then, it
didn't bother me much)
1 person has voted this message useful



Splog
Diglot
Senior Member
Czech Republic
anthonylauder.c
Joined 5681 days ago

1062 posts - 3263 votes 
Speaks: English*, Czech
Studies: Mandarin

 
 Message 10 of 26
16 April 2010 at 9:51am | IP Logged 
magictom123 wrote:

Indeed, the Michel Thomas Vocab courses headed this way where Rose Le Hayden 'teaches'
vocab to native speakers, whose responses seem to have been pasted in. Quite
ridiculous and spoils the authenticity of the course.

I original MT courses I've look at have been excellent, and despite the complaints
people have about the students, they never really distracted me (well, maybe the
annoying lady on the French Foudation course with her ohh la la's but even then, it
didn't bother me much)


I agree completely. The contributions of the "students" in the French Vocab course were a deleterious superfluity. It was clear from the start they were fluent already, and had no need for that course. The vocab course missed completely Michel Thomas's own realisation that the students on the recordings are supposed to be interacting with the teacher, making mistakes (along with the listener) and grow in their knowledge as the course progresses. As he said himself, the listener is meant to feel part of a group of three students, and with the vocab course I did not have that feeling at all.

EDIT: To be fair, Rose Hayden is not the teacher on the French Vocab course. For a start, she is American, and the teacher on that course is English. I believe the teacher's name is Helene Lewis.

Edited by Splog on 16 April 2010 at 9:53am

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6023 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 11 of 26
16 April 2010 at 1:03pm | IP Logged 
Also worth noting that Ginny also said on the forums that the new courses took a week to record and massive stretches are edited out, because (as she put it) it would be boring for the home student to sit and listen to long passages of the teacher trying to correct the recorded students' pronunciation or simple errors.

She completely and utterly missed Thomas's point: an audio course that is a recorded class goes at the speed that a learner can cope with -- it is the ultimate "pacing" mechanism. If you edit out parts of a live class recording, then you have something that is too fast for the learner (evidence: not even the learners getting one-to-one tuition in the studio could have handled the pace on the final CDs). The fact that the students were taking so long to grasp the concepts being taught shows one thing: they weren't being taught right.

There was a fundamental problem with the teaching, and editing was nothing more than a crutch to get any old rubbish on the market and make more money.
5 persons have voted this message useful



sctroyenne
Diglot
Senior Member
United StatesRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5403 days ago

739 posts - 1312 votes 
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Spanish, Irish

 
 Message 13 of 26
17 December 2013 at 5:39pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
The students (or at least the majority) were trained performers.
However, they weren't primed or pre-trained, it was just that Hodder needed people who
would be comfortable in front of a microphone and who would speak clearly enough to be
heard properly by the listener.


Yeah, I was about to say I'm sure they all just took their check for voice over work,
stuck in on their resumes and went on their way. I do like the aspect where it feels
like you're sitting in a class with a grizzled old professor who's taught the course so
many times he can do it in his sleep (any maybe does from time to time).

It's a shame that the newer courses felt that the passages with little mistakes needed
to be edited out to save the listener from "boredom" and that they opted to use native
speakers for the vocabulary courses. I know you're supposed to gauge how well you're
getting it based on how you compare to the smart and the less gifted students but if
all the mistakes that the students make are edited out or a native is acting as a
student I can only imagine how discouraging that would be for a learner.
1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5577 days ago

938 posts - 1840 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 14 of 26
17 December 2013 at 6:21pm | IP Logged 
The Vocabulary courses wouldn't work with real students - unless you doubled the CDs as
there is too much material to take in and get through. Nor do I think that the native
'students' are superfluous as you have a native spoken example before reinforcement by
the tutor. What is annoying is the pretence that it is a live student with all the
'Well done' 'That's right'. Paul Noble's courses manage to do away with the students
and they work as well as the Michel Thomas courses, even if they are very basic (still,
the German one manages to cover the case system).

Given that the two primary complaints about the original MT courses are a) the students
and b) Michel Thomas' Polish accent and gum sucking, I would have thought having native
speakers and a tutor who speaks clearly would be a bonus.

As to Hélène Lewis - I personally think she is charming, calming and has a nice voice.
Given she can actually pronounce French rather than choking on her tongue as Michel
Thomas does, I don't see the problem.

Personally I got a lot out of the MT Method Vocabulary courses - I found them to be a
great workout of structures and idioms as well as a vocabulary course.


Edited by Elexi on 17 December 2013 at 11:51pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6609 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 15 of 26
17 December 2013 at 9:17pm | IP Logged 
sctroyenne wrote:
It's a shame that the newer courses felt that the passages with little mistakes needed to be edited out to save the listener from "boredom" and that they opted to use native speakers for the vocabulary courses. I know you're supposed to gauge how well you're getting it based on how you compare to the smart and the less gifted students but if all the mistakes that the students make are edited out or a native is acting as a student I can only imagine how discouraging that would be for a learner.
Well, the original quote mentioned pronunciation mistakes specifically. They were corrected because he didn't want the students to keep making them on the recording. Perhaps he even wanted the people to learn more in case they ever care to continue learning the language.

As far as I understand, correcting grammar mistakes or incorrect words is still considered an important part of the method. There's also the factor that with pronunciation it's harder to compare ourselves to other people, and in general I'm not sure it was a factor while choosing the bright and less bright student.
1 person has voted this message useful



montmorency
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4840 days ago

2371 posts - 3676 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Danish, Welsh

 
 Message 16 of 26
17 December 2013 at 10:36pm | IP Logged 
I remember the male student on the Advanced Spanish (I think it was) was clearly an ac-
tor, trained in the Laurence Olivier school of delivery. He was at least easier to listen
to than the poor chap on the beginners course, whom one wanted to send home, with a note
to his mother, saying that in future, he should only come to school after a good night's
sleep and a proper breakfast.


5 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 26 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 13 4  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.