Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Orthography making grammar regular

  Tags: Spelling | Grammar
 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
11 messages over 2 pages: 1 2  Next >>
clumsy
Octoglot
Senior Member
Poland
lang-8.com/6715Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4989 days ago

1116 posts - 1367 votes 
Speaks: Polish*, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Mandarin, Italian, Vietnamese
Studies: Spanish, Arabic (Written), Swedish
Studies: Danish, Dari, Kirundi

 
 Message 1 of 11
17 November 2011 at 12:16pm | IP Logged 
I have noticed there exist some orthographies that make grammar easier to learn.
Especially Korean, but also Polish, Japanese etc.

So I wonder, can there be an orthography that will make a language completely regular? or almost?



1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 4867 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 2 of 11
17 November 2011 at 12:26pm | IP Logged 
clumsy wrote:


So I wonder, can there be an orthography that will make a language completely regular? or
almost?



Of course, it can't. Although, for example, French could be simplified by a spelling
reform.
1 person has voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6393 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 3 of 11
17 November 2011 at 12:44pm | IP Logged 
Of course there can, hypothetically. If you have a language that is completely regular except for the word "boy" which acquires a silent 'e' in the plural, and you change the orthography to remove that 'e', you have made the grammar completely regular.

That's a pretty unlikely scenario. The answer is "yes", if you speak hypothetically, but probably "no" if you mention a particular language.

Can you give examples of how Korean and Polish make grammar easier to learn?
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6514 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 4 of 11
17 November 2011 at 2:22pm | IP Logged 
I can't imagine how any orthography could make an irregular morphology regular without dropping any ambitions about reflecting the language as it is. At most it can force people to take elements seriously which mostly disappear in sloppy speech, but sometimes are pronounced.

On the other hand a bad orthography (someby mentioned French) can certainly add complications which aren't present in the spoken language.
1 person has voted this message useful



Hampie
Diglot
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 6470 days ago

625 posts - 1009 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: Latin, German, Mandarin

 
 Message 5 of 11
17 November 2011 at 2:31pm | IP Logged 
Toki pona is entirely regular and very easy to both pronounce and spell, though well, it’s a conlang.
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6514 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 6 of 11
17 November 2011 at 3:05pm | IP Logged 
But then the grammar is already regular, and the orthography just has the decency not to spoil it
1 person has voted this message useful



Cabaire
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5410 days ago

725 posts - 1352 votes 

 
 Message 7 of 11
17 November 2011 at 4:34pm | IP Logged 
Sometimes the orthography masks sound varieties. E.g. the plural of English nouns is sometimes pronounced [s] like in cats, sometimes [z] like in girls, but always written /s/. Or take the arabic article. You always write uniformely ال, but in reality you have sometimes to do assimilations, when followed by a sun letter.

In such a way orthography can smooth phonetic changes, but the grammar will stay as it was, even if the written form seems simpler.
1 person has voted this message useful



clumsy
Octoglot
Senior Member
Poland
lang-8.com/6715Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4989 days ago

1116 posts - 1367 votes 
Speaks: Polish*, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Mandarin, Italian, Vietnamese
Studies: Spanish, Arabic (Written), Swedish
Studies: Danish, Dari, Kirundi

 
 Message 8 of 11
10 December 2011 at 1:36pm | IP Logged 
SOrry for late reply.


Actually, for example let's start with Polish.



There exist letters in Polish orthography that are pronunced in the same way.


Some people could say: "so why bother? discard one, and it all will be much simpler".


but he would be wrong.


u and ó are all pronunced the same, but in some cases (noun cases), ó changes into o.

u does not change.



Another example is Korean.
Korean is generally regarded as a very regular language in comparision to European
langs.
but if you think about it, it is actually not the case.


For example, ass verbs in Korean end with 다
but not all of them are pronunced the same.
it may be 다 or it may be 타.
for example


좋다 is pronunced as 졷타 or something like this.
ㅎ turns ㄷ into ㅌ.
Why they didn't simply use the letter ㅌ from the very beginning?
because that would make it much more irregular!

있다 - to exist.

있 - the stem never changes its form, but the pronuntiation does change.


you have to learn the sound change rules (they are listed on sogang Korean).
but once you learn them... Korean grammar is easy.


Think about learning Korean spelled phonetically!
that would be really hard!


이 여자가 학교에 있어요 =이 여자가 항교에 이써요
also, that makes the 한자 having only one spelling, even though they can be pronunced
differenty according to their position.




What about French?
they don't pronunce the plural s.
but if a vowel follows you do pronunce it.
without this spelling would be confusing.



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 11 messages over 2 pages: 2  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.