|
 |
The official term for MT/Pimsleur/Noble | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes |  | |
| Kugel Senior Member United States Joined 6336 days ago 497 posts - 555 votes  Speaks: English* | Message 1 of 2 06 September 2012 at 8:21pm | IP Logged |
|
In SLA what is the official term for the methods that are shared between MT, Paul Noble, and Pimsleur? They are all audio, but what I'm looking for is the method that is systematic, almost like plowing through a basic Logic course, in that it prompts the reader with an English phrase, forcing the student to construct something using only the given parameters taught by the program. Here is an analogy (probably not a good one):
Typical Elementary Logic Course 1.(K&H) V (K&L) 2.-L /H 3. K & (HVL) Dist 4. (HVL) & K Com 5. HVL simp 6. LVH com 7. H DS [from 2 and 6 DS) There aren't as many steps in a simple prompt by MT, Pimsleur, and Noble. But has anyone worked out the rules from, say, a MT course? 1 person has voted this message useful | |
| Elexi Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 5363 days ago 938 posts - 1839 votes Speaks: English* Studies: French, German, Latin | Message 2 of 2 09 September 2012 at 10:15am | IP Logged |
|
In SLA terms I think these courses would be classed as an audio only version of Grammar Translation.
1 person has voted this message useful |
If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
