Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Your opinion on Ludwig Wittgenstein.

  Tags: Philosophy
 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
13 messages over 2 pages: 1 2  Next >>
FinnegansWake
Diglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 4195 days ago

10 posts - 14 votes
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: French

 
 Message 1 of 13
08 November 2012 at 6:34am | IP Logged 
I would like to know your opinion on German philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein.

I have been studying 'Philosophical Investigations'.

I have a strong feeling the man had great ideas but lacked the skill to clearly
articulate them with words.

I think this gradually formed a deep frustration in his mind, which ultimately led him
into his philosophical journey.

[He mentions he had been disappointed at the way people interpret his work]

I can sort of feel this frustration, which manifests in me in the form of extreme
intimidation and lack of confidence when trying to tackle my target language (French).



Edited by FinnegansWake on 08 November 2012 at 6:36am

1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6463 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 2 of 13
08 November 2012 at 10:23am | IP Logged 
I think he was an Asperger, who became somewhat more 'mellow' later in life. His first project was to codify philosophy almost as mathematical statements (which reminds me of Descartes and Bertrand Russell) - and he didn't solve this task, which left him deeply frustrated and vulnerable to criticism from people who didn't understand the details and who had other plans for philosophy (which didn't include a complete codification). And then he transmogryphed into a more mainstream philosopher with a less demanding project. Personally I find the 'first' Wittgenstein by far the most interesting of the two.

I can't see the relevance of Wittgenstein for language learning - except maybe insofar that he set himself an impossible task which he had to cut down to a manageable size.

Edited by Iversen on 08 November 2012 at 10:26am

4 persons have voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5325 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 3 of 13
08 November 2012 at 1:04pm | IP Logged 
He was actually an Austrian (in fact, he went to the same school as Hitler).
2 persons have voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5325 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 4 of 13
08 November 2012 at 1:29pm | IP Logged 
I also don't personally agree that he lacked the skill to clearly articulate his ideas
with words (by the time of the PI most philosophers in his tradition wrote in symbolic
logic in any case). It is possible to get a summary of the ideas in the PI and, from
Wittgenstein's other writings, it is clear he could have written such a summary.
However, his method in the Investigations is specifically reviving the old Socratic
technique of trying to engage the reader dialectically in a game that reveals the
philosophical problems - Nietzsche does similar things with his stories and aphorism.

The PI is purposefully setting out to avoid giving the reader a passive 'dose' of
philosophical argument - which makes it a hard text to read for the reader. But when
one is critiquing the essentialist view of language (e.g. in the most simplistic terms
the word 'car' refers to an object and all words in a language do the same) maybe this
is what one needs   

I agree with Iversen about the lack of relevance for language learning - but I suppose
the PI would probably suggest a communicative approach to language rather than go
through word -picture lists.

If you want a greater challenge - try reading Spinoza's Ethics...

Edited by Elexi on 08 November 2012 at 1:31pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



FinnegansWake
Diglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 4195 days ago

10 posts - 14 votes
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: French

 
 Message 5 of 13
08 November 2012 at 4:38pm | IP Logged 
Elexi wrote:
He was actually an Austrian (in fact, he went to the same school as
Hitler).


I forgot.... My bad. :)


1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4604 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 6 of 13
08 November 2012 at 5:18pm | IP Logged 
I think Wittgenstein's greatest concept from the Philosophical Investigations is the 'Sprachspiel'. Words and meanings are not clearly defined as the analytical philosophy tries to tell us, but they're alway negotiad anew through the intersubjective discourse which defines the rules of language. This clearly contradicts Wittgenstein's earlier hypothesis that language is a direct representation of the world, which he uttered in the Tractatus logico-philosophicus.

In my opinion, the later Wittgenstein is much more interesting than the early one, because he moves away from Frege's and Russel's analytical philosophy and their desire to create a merely logical language and turns to a more descriptive view on how language really works. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that Wittgenstein is one of the fathers of modern philosophy of language, which is closely related to linguistics. So, Wittgenstein might not be important for the language learning process itself but for any attempt to explain how language works. And those theories should have a space in this forum, too.
3 persons have voted this message useful



mahasiswa
Pentaglot
Groupie
Canada
Joined 4192 days ago

91 posts - 142 votes 
Speaks: English*, French, Spanish, German, Malay
Studies: Arabic (Egyptian), Persian, Russian, Turkish, Mandarin, Hindi

 
 Message 7 of 13
09 November 2012 at 4:51am | IP Logged 
Josquin, das stimmt, you're bang on about the Sprachspiel ('language game'). I would also add that he was
as much a poetic philosopher as Nietzsche, by his claim that what he had not written was equally
important to understand. Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen. That is, you
must silence yourself from what you can't talk about.

And you can't discount his plumbing abilities! However, rephrasing what you said into academese, he is
certainly a forerunner of the 'linguistic turn in philosophy' (which is the key phrase students are apt to find
further information on it via MLA or JSTOR, etc.).
2 persons have voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6463 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 8 of 13
09 November 2012 at 9:59am | IP Logged 
And the 'linguistic turn in philosophy' is precisely where I find that W's philosophy dropped back into mainstream loose babble. His first position was succinctly formulated as "Was sich überhaupt sagen läß, läßt sich klar sagen; und wovon man nicht reden kann, darüber muß man schweigen" (Tractatus, prologue). Realizing after the last page of Tractatus that his next book would have to consist of empty pages he cleverly realized that the things he said maybe didn't have to be a precise description of reality and that you actually couldn't know the reality 'in itself' (a conclusion already reached by Kant) ... and then you could just as well start babbling loosely,and then he dubbed that activity 'Sprachspiel'. As I said, he cut down on his impossibly high ambitions and adapted to the realities. And became more human, but also more bland and boring in the process. Those who took the narrow path of virtue became mathematicians rather than philosophers.

Edited by Iversen on 09 November 2012 at 10:25am



2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 13 messages over 2 pages: 2  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 3.2813 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.