Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

FIA and Assimil French Comparison

  Tags: Assimil | French
 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
14 messages over 2 pages: 1 2  Next >>
James29
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5175 days ago

1265 posts - 2113 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: French

 
 Message 1 of 14
05 August 2013 at 2:46am | IP Logged 
I have read a number of threads about French in Action and Assimil's New French with Ease. I own NFE and have done Assimil's Spanish with Ease so I understand how the course works and have a pretty good idea of how far it takes you.

I gather from the threads on FIA is that it is an absolutely awesome course. People seem to say that it takes about 5-7 hours per lesson and on a schedule of one hour a day it would take a year to complete. People also say, however, that it only takes to you a low B-1 level.

It seems from the threads that 6 months of Assimil 30 minutes a day gets you further than one year of FIA for 60 minutes a day. Is this true? If so, how is it possible if FIA is such an awesome course?   


1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5365 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 2 of 14
05 August 2013 at 12:12pm | IP Logged 
FIA and Assimil NFE do cover roughly the same ground, its just that FIA gives you more
of it - almost like immersion. By that I mean French in Action provides more 'language
rich learning' (if that is the right phrase) - you go over the same material more often
from different angles - e.g. by learning formal grammar, by examples, by oral and
written exercises, by audio, by video and in many difference contexts.

In reality, this is also what one has to do with Assimil to get the best out of it.    


2 persons have voted this message useful



Sterogyl
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4167 days ago

152 posts - 263 votes 
Studies: German*, French, EnglishC2
Studies: Japanese, Norwegian

 
 Message 3 of 14
05 August 2013 at 5:59pm | IP Logged 
One concentrated hour of French every single day for one whole year and all you get is a low B1? Then you're doing something wrong (or you're from a non-indogermanic background, maybe). And why is the course awesome then?
1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5365 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 4 of 14
05 August 2013 at 8:45pm | IP Logged 
Why do you say that? The estimated time to for the average learner to obtain CEFR B1
from The Association of Language Testers of Europe is 350-400 hours - which maps onto 1
concentrated hour per day, give or take a few hours.

As has often been discussed here - Assimil, Teach Yourself, etc, all advertise
unrealistic grade levels on their courses. I doubt very much that one would not be able
to pass CEFR B1 doing Assimil for 30 minutes per day for 6 months unless one was already
an established language learner.


Edited by Elexi on 05 August 2013 at 8:58pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



Sterogyl
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4167 days ago

152 posts - 263 votes 
Studies: German*, French, EnglishC2
Studies: Japanese, Norwegian

 
 Message 5 of 14
05 August 2013 at 9:58pm | IP Logged 
Elexi wrote:
Why do you say that? The estimated time to for the average learner to obtain CEFR B1
from The Association of Language Testers of Europe is 350-400 hours - which maps onto 1
concentrated hour per day, give or take a few hours.


For what language, and what's the native language of the so-called 'average learner'? I think this shows very well that the Association's estimation is complete nonsense. Furthermore, are these 350-400 hours classroom hours, is homework/self-study exluded etc.?

I just don't think that you only reach a "low B1" when you study one hour in a concentrated fashion for a duration of 12 months, provided you study French and you are a native speaker of English. B1 isn't the highest level, especially a "low B1" is next to nothing.
1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5365 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 6 of 14
05 August 2013 at 10:45pm | IP Logged 
I don't think that FIA is a low-B1, I would estimate it is more in the range of a very
solid upper B1.

But I think it is a reasonable estimate to say that it takes the average native English
speaker studying French for only 1 hour per day about 1 year to reach a solid B1. I
don't even think this is a contentious statement - 360 hours is the time that most
French language schools, such as the Institut Francais or the Alliance Francaise,
estimate for English speakers to reach DELF B1+. By comparison, Deutsche Welle suggest
it takes 400 hours to reach German B1.2 So unless all such bodies are making complete
nonsense estimations, the 1 year mark is touted as a pretty universal figure.    

As I said before, if one is already an established language learner, then one would
probably obtain the level with more alacrity, but for most English speakers getting to
the point where one could cruise a B1 exam takes that level of time. Especially if only
1 hour per day is dedicated to the task - I think longer studying per day creates a
greater synergy, but 1 hour per day is not really much time in terms of language
learning.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Sterogyl
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4167 days ago

152 posts - 263 votes 
Studies: German*, French, EnglishC2
Studies: Japanese, Norwegian

 
 Message 7 of 14
06 August 2013 at 6:23am | IP Logged 
Elexi wrote:
By comparison, Deutsche Welle suggest
it takes 400 hours to reach German B1.2 So unless all such bodies are making complete
nonsense estimations, the 1 year mark is touted as a pretty universal figure.   


These estimations must be nonsense, by all means, since the rapidity of language acquisition highly depends on the degree of relationship of your native language and the language to be studied.

And according to "them", what exactly signifies one hour of studying? Sitting in a classroom with a teacher and other students? Then their estimations might even be optimistic.

Quote:

Especially if only
1 hour per day is dedicated to the task - I think longer studying per day creates a
greater synergy, but 1 hour per day is not really much time in terms of language
learning.


I think most people don't manage to study one whole hour per day on their own, every day, for one whole year and in a concentrated fashion. One hour is already a lot!
1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5365 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 8 of 14
06 August 2013 at 9:41am | IP Logged 
I think you are probably right on the latter, but for those of us that can do it, it is
never enough.




1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 14 messages over 2 pages: 2  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3750 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.