Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Language Revival

  Tags: Dead Languages
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
17 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3  Next >>
demie
Triglot
Newbie
United Kingdom
Joined 3829 days ago

12 posts - 16 votes
Speaks: English*, German, French
Studies: Japanese, Slovenian

 
 Message 1 of 17
28 December 2013 at 1:58pm | IP Logged 
I was just daydreaming about the possible revival of Cumbric, but unfortunately it wasn't
very well recorded and there's no way it could be brought back :(
But for Cumbric and languages like it, what would be the ~point~ of revival? I think it
would definitely build some sense of community and belonging among its speakers and
perhaps create some unity between the Northern English and the Southern Scottish (it was
spoken in those areas). But really, who would want that? I think people and governments
would rather have British unity as a whole rather than individual groups? I'm not sure
Anyway, do you think there will ever be a successful revival of a language just "for the
sake of it"? Or would there need to be a set reason?
2 persons have voted this message useful



eyðimörk
Triglot
Senior Member
France
goo.gl/aT4FY7
Joined 3888 days ago

490 posts - 1158 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French
Studies: Breton, Italian

 
 Message 2 of 17
28 December 2013 at 2:49pm | IP Logged 
I don't think anyone could revive a language just for the sake of it any more than people reach a native level fluency in a language just for the sake of it. You don't choose to live a large part, or most of, your life in a language for no reason, and that's what I think is necessary for a revival. Even when people live their daily lives in a minority language it's hard to keep it alive, much less revive it.

As for Cumbric, as interesting as it would've been to have that language alive and well I can't think of a single good reason to bring about a revival (as opposed to studying it as a dead language). It's been dead for 900 years. 'Hen Ogledd'/Alclud has a new linguistic and cultural identity shaped by, amongst other things, Gaelic and Old Norse. It would be artificial to impose a Brythonic identity and language on top of that.
2 persons have voted this message useful



montmorency
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4617 days ago

2371 posts - 3676 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Danish, Welsh

 
 Message 3 of 17
30 December 2013 at 3:37am | IP Logged 
One of the reasons I decided to learn Welsh is that Cumbric (the possible, probable,
language of my ancestors) was supposed to be close to Welsh.

No one really knows.

But Welsh is living (or on life support....), and Cumbric is not. It seems we will
never have much, if any, evidence of Cumbric. But there is plenty of evidence of Welsh
going back a long way, and there are still some first language Welsh speakers, so there
is hope.

Cornish, on the other hand......


1 person has voted this message useful



tanya b
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4567 days ago

159 posts - 518 votes 
Speaks: Russian

 
 Message 4 of 17
30 December 2013 at 4:39am | IP Logged 
I confess to daydreaming about dead languages, too, but I guess the revival of Hebrew is probably the template of how to bring back a language from near-extinction to viability. And also, but for the existence of the nation of Israel Hebrew might well be relegated to the status that Coptic has today in Egypt.

Another case is the revival of the Blackfoot language in western Montana, which has been successful on a small scale, but there will never be a Blackfoot multi-media empire to combat the influence of English, so it will always be endangered.

Maybe if the Blackfoot were as isolated as the Hopi of Arizona, to say nothing of the nationalities of the North Caucasus, there would be no need for a revival in the first place.

But even with a full revival, the question of sustainability arises. Is there a support system in place for the survival of the language? In today's world a TL needs silly commercials, stand-up comics, terrible rappers, etc. just to stay in the marketplace.

But all that and massive infusions of cash cannot move indifferent people to study a language that a few ivory-tower intellectuals think is important historically.

I live in the US, where millions can't or won't learn basic English, forfeiting the benefits it may offer them. If that mentality prevails with English, how you gonna make them want to study Sanskrit?



Edited by tanya b on 30 December 2013 at 4:42am

5 persons have voted this message useful



Cavesa
Triglot
Senior Member
Czech Republic
Joined 4798 days ago

3277 posts - 6779 votes 
Speaks: Czech*, FrenchC2, EnglishC1
Studies: Spanish, German, Italian

 
 Message 5 of 17
30 December 2013 at 10:20pm | IP Logged 
Resuscitation of a language at the edge of death is possible, with lots of efforts, will and resources. It has been done several times. But in some cases, it would be rather an attempt on necromancy. Either impossible to do or you could get some weak, zombielike results which wouldn't last long.
1 person has voted this message useful



Henkkles
Triglot
Senior Member
Finland
Joined 4042 days ago

544 posts - 1141 votes 
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 6 of 17
30 December 2013 at 10:29pm | IP Logged 
Because reviving a language is about heritage speakers; people who want to reconnect with their roots and maybe even have (had) grandparents who were native speakers, but didn't teach it to their children and thus the language died for a while. Language revival has absolutely nothing to do with trying to get people who reside in the USA who do not speak English to learn Sanskrit.
4 persons have voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6492 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 7 of 17
05 January 2014 at 2:02am | IP Logged 
I would consider learning to read things like Sumerian, Homeric Greek and Cumbrian (insofar there is something to read there), but I wouldn't waste time on learning to speak them unless there was at least a small group of enthousiasts on the internet or real life to establish each of them as a living language. However once I knew there was such a community I might not even be particularly eager to join it, because it would take ahellofalotof time to learn to speak it well enough, and I don't have that time. I might be content with letting them rumble around in my head, like I do with for instance Latin and Low German.

Edited by Iversen on 05 January 2014 at 9:22am

2 persons have voted this message useful



1e4e6
Octoglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4079 days ago

1013 posts - 1588 votes 
Speaks: English*, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Norwegian, Dutch, Swedish, Italian
Studies: German, Danish, Russian, Catalan

 
 Message 8 of 17
05 January 2014 at 2:40am | IP Logged 
The Romance language that interests me the most is Latin, but one cannot use it like
other live languages, which is a pity. I also like Old English instead of
Modern English--the five cases, three genders, dual form, all three word orders:
SOV/SVO/OVS and six verb conjugations for each tense interests me more. If those two
were still used, I would definitely want to be fluent in Latin and Old English and have
conversations therein. But since they are not, I do not have the initiative to learn
them. It would be interesting were Modern English used internationally, but England
continued to use Old English as a national language.

Strange may it sound, but it could be plausible given that Icelandic is supposedly very
related to Old English and apparently is extremely conversative linguistically as it
barely changed since the 900s, but it still used currently, with most Icelanders
knowing not only Icelandic, but Modern English as well. So it could be interesting if
England had Old English as the first native language, with Modern English as a second,
but obligatory foreign language learnt in primary school onwards like in Scandinavia.

Gōdne ǣfen, ic cume fram Mameceaster, Geānede Cynerīce

Edited by 1e4e6 on 05 January 2014 at 4:14am



2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 17 messages over 3 pages: 2 3  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4219 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.