|
 |
Learning exclusively with authentic video | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies |  | |
 emk Diglot Moderator United States Joined 5313 days ago 2615 posts - 8806 votes  Speaks: English*, FrenchB2 Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian Personal Language Map | Message 129 of 170 24 November 2014 at 8:29pm | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
I want to be fair: Learning Mandarin with no basis in a related language is much harder than moving between French and Spanish. My ~20 hours, therefore, should probably be compared to 80 hours studying Chinese, or possibly even more, because I get an extra boost from French. One fun way to evaluate listening skills: Watch something, and make a list of things you understand without subtitles. For example, here's a list from Sprachprofi's 30-hour experiment:
I did a similar exercise with episode 6 of Avatar, which I haven't yet studied. This is after ~10 hours of Anki reps, or a bit under 300 cards:
You can see that I'm picking up longer phrases sooner than Sprachprofi did, though probably not 4x as fast. Well, except for that big one at the end—that really surprised me! I'd love to see the equivalent information for pure video watching with no subtitles. 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
| victorhart Bilingual Tetraglot Groupie United States mandarinexperiment.o Joined 3488 days ago 66 posts - 155 votes Speaks: English*, Portuguese*, Spanish, French Studies: Mandarin | Message 130 of 170 14 December 2014 at 4:57pm | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
I share your admiration for emk's subs2srs method and would bet on its efficiency over my method for a beginner learning an entirely foreign language such as Mandarin. My latest blog post is about it and I hope to incorporate it as a strategy at my language institute. However, regarding my Mandarin method, don't you think you may be jumping the gun? Or perhaps you had already come to your conclusion long before my experiment, irrespective of my results . . . According to the Foreign Service Institute's 50 years of experience, seasoned, capable, and highly motivated language learners using best methods take about 4,600 hours, including one year in-country, to reach ILR Level 3 in Mandarin. I have thus far put in 4% of those hours with a one-sided experimental approach. Why don't you give me a little more time before calling in the jury? Generally speaking, my goal in language acquisition is near-native mastery. Therefore, I take the long view. If I get to a decent level of listening comprehension after 1,200 hours, and that provides the foundation for reaching ILR 3 after 4,600 hours, I will deem my method a clear success. That's not to say there aren't better methods, and I'm all for emk and others showing the relative advantages of technology-intensive approaches such as subs2srs. I just think the issues are a bit more complex and nuanced than your assessments would suggest. As I'm sure you know, language mastery is not a 20 or 200-hour affair, nor a formulaic competition. Edited by victorhart on 14 December 2014 at 4:57pm 2 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5211 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish | Message 131 of 170 15 December 2014 at 7:40am | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
I like to think that I choose my words carefully. I said: "...watching incomprehensible native media is very inefficient." I stand by this statement. If this experiment consisted entirely of watching Mandarin- language movies without subtitles or the language-learning videos, I believe that the results would be about zero. The reason I'm so adamant about this is simply that without any kind of "hook" that establishes a connection between the sounds of the language and meaning, it is impossible to make sense of the sounds. But what we have here is a modified experiment in which the Mandarin-language videos are supplemented with English subtitles and the videos aimed at teaching Mandarin to young children. These two elements are very important because they provide some of the missing hooks and elements that give meaning to the sounds in the films. We are no longer working with entirely incomprehensible videos. I have conceded that this combination has some efficiency compared to the pure video formula. I still think that it is inefficient, albeit less inefficient than the initial idea, but inefficient none-the-less. On the other hand, emk's approach, following in the footsteps of others, is to go straight to the fundamental foundation of an efficient learning strategy: associate sound, meaning and form through the use of L1 and L2 subtitles and Anki SRS. The videos become comprehensible. And progress, as we see, is rapid. This approach, as demonstrated here, works for the very reason that the incomprehensible video approach does not work: comprehensible input works. Incomprehensible input does not. Edited by s_allard on 16 December 2014 at 1:13pm 3 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
| Snowflake Senior Member United States Joined 5740 days ago 1032 posts - 1233 votes Studies: Mandarin | Message 132 of 170 15 December 2014 at 5:30pm | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
|
DLI (Defense Language Institute) starts their students with incomprehensible input from
day 1. So I believe there are benefits in using incomprehensible input even though we don't necessarily understand the reasons. 2 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
 jeff_lindqvist Diglot Moderator SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 6690 days ago 4250 posts - 5710 votes Speaks: Swedish*, English Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French Personal Language Map | Message 133 of 170 15 December 2014 at 5:58pm | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
|
What does this mean? Basically everything except super-obvious cognates and visual cues will be incomprehensible in the beginning. And, even if incomprehensible input is better than no input at all, that doesn't mean it's "best". Why learn like a child when you're a grown-up?
1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
| emk Diglot Moderator United States Joined 5313 days ago 2615 posts - 8806 votes Speaks: English*, FrenchB2 Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian Personal Language Map | Message 134 of 170 15 December 2014 at 7:24pm | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
Well, I have nothing against incomprehensible input, and I strongly suspect that it helps. When I first moved to Italy, Italian was just a total blur. After a while, though, I started hearing syllables and words, even if I couldn't understand it. My guess is that there are low-level subsystems in the brain that try to figure out how sounds fit together, and that remember which sounds tend to occur together. Dr. Paul Sulzberger had an interesting hypothesis about this:
I've experienced this: I'll hear a sequence of sounds until they're as familiar as an annoying top 40 song. And then one day, I'll finally hear them in a context where their meaning is clear from context, and I'll learn the meaning instantly. But here's the catch: Incomprehensible listening may help prepare you to learn the language. But if all you have is totally incomprehensible input (say, local news radio for a farming town somewhere in Japan), how is your brain ever supposed to connect the words to actual meanings? Again, my favorite example here is Egyptian: We had thousands and thousands of pages of text that remained untranslatable for 1,400 years. But even Champollion, a first-rate polyglot, needed to learn a related language (Coptic) and use a parallel text (the Rosetta stone) to actually make any headway. Now, it doesn't surprise me that the DLI uses incomprehensible input. (I do myself, mostly as background listening.) But I understand that DLI also makes heavy use of vocabulary lists, grammar instruction and comprehensible input, as well as personal interaction. Is this correct? Edited by emk on 16 December 2014 at 1:10pm 2 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
| Snowflake Senior Member United States Joined 5740 days ago 1032 posts - 1233 votes Studies: Mandarin | Message 135 of 170 16 December 2014 at 3:22am | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
Yes, that is my understanding. On the incomprehensible input, one person mentioned watching the TL version of CNN news. Another person mentioned watching varied TV programs with lots and lots of advertisements. It seems like it would be quite a while before I+1 could kick in for these things. Edited by Snowflake on 16 December 2014 at 3:25am 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||||||||
| Teango Triglot Winner TAC 2010 & 2012 Senior Member United States teango.wordpress.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 5337 days ago 2210 posts - 3734 votes Speaks: English*, German, Russian Studies: Hawaiian, French, Toki Pona | Message 136 of 170 17 December 2014 at 3:41am | IP Logged | ||||||||||||||
|
It's a brave and fascinating project you've got planned here, victorhart, and as long as you're having fun with it, I look forward to following how you progress over the longer term.
I particularly like that you provide personal insights and reflections in your weekly blogs alongside the more quantitative graphs, and share ongoing findings, links, and recommendations with readers. For example, my wife and I will be taking you up on one of your suggestions this evening by watching "Eat Drink Man Woman". We've been watching a lot of movies in Hindi with English subtitles more recently (my wife loves Bollywood), but I don't think we picked up much more than the word for "brother" and the phrase "Let's go!" I think it's about time for a Chinese romcom now. ;) With regards to methodology, the first real step I guess is to notice useful words, either through repetition or some other salient feature that helps them stand out from the crowd. Once the much smaller set of commonly spoken words and phrases declines to a withering epic tail of low general frequency content words, watching movies you already know well, or that offer lots of repetition within a closely knit segment of dialogue on a specific topic, could be a way to boost comprehension a little further and help encourage uptake. Repeated watching could also be particularly helpful in this respect with enough time elapsing between viewings to let emerging structures settle in and subtly interact across different contexts. Good luck in finding these types of resources and staying positive and motivated throughout your experiment! Edited by Teango on 17 December 2014 at 3:43am 3 persons have voted this message useful |
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
