|
 |
Learning exclusively with authentic video | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies |  | |
| robarb Nonaglot Senior Member United States languagenpluson Joined 4841 days ago 361 posts - 921 votes  Speaks: Portuguese, English*, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, French Studies: Mandarin, Danish, Russian, Norwegian, Cantonese, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Greek, Latin, Nepali, Modern Hebrew | Message 137 of 170 17 December 2014 at 3:45am | IP Logged | ||
Where are you getting the 4,600 hours figure? I am seeing 2,200 hours (Wikibooks source) but I can't find the original FSI source. How many hours in do you suppose those learners are before video watching is comprehensible input? I would say that your goal of 1,200 hours seems like a good number to go for; if your comprehension is still under 25% by then I would conclude that the experiment is a failure. If it is higher than that, you could conclude success in that your method at least gets you in the ballpark of standard techniques, as at that point you would be able to find input that's mostly comprehensible, which everyone agrees is the foundation for advancing towards mastery--and you'd have incurred less than 1000 hours disadvantage by forgoing other kinds of studying. I do agree that Spanish is a poor comparison. For instance, you claim to have reached 6% comprehension so far. I've never studied Romanian before, but if I listen to the news I get over 10% just from cognates. It sounds to me like .... ... premier ... internal... defense.... ... president.. ... Ukraine... ... photo... ...decided... ...report. Learning Mandarin through video is not like that at all. 4 persons have voted this message useful | |||
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6379 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish | Message 138 of 170 17 December 2014 at 4:37am | IP Logged | ||
|
These are classroom hours though. And 1 hour at home for 1 hour in class is the bare minimum really, for such a difficult/different language.
3 persons have voted this message useful | |||
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5212 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish | Message 139 of 170 17 December 2014 at 5:29am | IP Logged | ||
Although this was not framed as an experiment as such, this posts tells us that after watching X numbers of hours of Hindi fils with English subtitles, only two words of Hindi were learned. What is certainly possible is to isolate words that correspond to very isolated actions. For example one could learn how to answer the phone (the equivalent of Hello) simply by looking at enough instances of this. Similarly, one could learn basic greetings and the names of objects when they are clearly delineated. That is why the Mandarin-learning videos aimed at children are so useful for the experiment at hand here. They were designed to isolate and highlight specific words. The problem is how to go beyond this sort of identification of isolated units. Let's say for example that we can figure how to say butterfly in Mandarin from a video that teaches that very word. That's a start, but how do you move to something with a bit more grammar such as I like butterflies or The butterfly is beautiful? And how do you get to even more complex structures such as Did you see a butterfly like this yesterday. Even though something can be learned, however slowly, in this modified experiment, and there may be some other social benefits of this activity, I don't see how a bit of formal study using any one of various high-tech or low-tech solutions could not enhance this learning experience. No language school, least of all the the American FSI, will plunk their students in front of incomprehensible video and nothing else. It seems to me that with a bit of formal work up front, this video-based learning will be even more enjoyable and efficient. Edited by s_allard on 17 December 2014 at 3:36pm 1 person has voted this message useful | |||
| rdearman Senior Member United Kingdom rdearman.orgRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 5018 days ago 881 posts - 1812 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Italian, French, Mandarin | Message 140 of 170 17 December 2014 at 12:19pm | IP Logged | ||
|
@s_allard - Don't forget this is defined as an Experiment. Experiments can and do fail. The failure of an experiment can tell us as much or more than a successful one.
Personally I wouldn't hold out much hope of learning Mandarin just watching films, I don't seem to be able to learn it and I'm actively using textbooks and all the classic methods! :) Good luck victorhart with your experiment. 4 persons have voted this message useful | |||
| victorhart Bilingual Tetraglot Groupie United States mandarinexperiment.o Joined 3489 days ago 66 posts - 155 votes Speaks: English*, Portuguese*, Spanish, French Studies: Mandarin | Message 141 of 170 18 December 2014 at 1:55am | IP Logged | ||
|
Thank you all for the thoughtful and encouraging replies.
robarb, I came up with the 4,600 hours as follows (a bit more detail in this thread). As you correctly recall, FSI states 2,200 classroom hours are needed to reach ILR 3. They also say 3-4 hours of directed self-study are done per day and 1 year is in-country. I did not include any hours for possible immersion in-country, but calculated the independent study on the higher end, i.e. 4 hours a day * 7 days a week * 88 weeks = 2,464 hours. So summing classroom and self-study—about 4,600 hours. s_allard, you're right about the subtitles and the children's shows. They certainly make my experiment different than if all I did was watch non-subtitled movies for adults from day one. So I now understand your opinion better. Also, I agree with emk both about the utility of incomprehensible input to prepare one's brain and about the need for comprehensible content to actually learn and master the language (the ancient Egyptian example is to the point). However, s_allard and emk, it's also important to keep in mind an obvious fact: I'm using video, which provides a great deal of rich visual cues (the "hook"). As relatively incomprehensible as Mandarin may have been for me in the beginning, watching even regular non-subtitled movies is a far cry from listening to pure audio or staring at hieroglyphics. For example, there is no way you can watch Mandarin movies for a while, with serious interest in learning the language, and not figure out the word "hao" (used to express concurrence, admiration, etc.). You eventually cannot help figuring out "ni" and "wo" ("you" and "me") as well. And you then start picking up verbs. For example, in a climatic love scene the hero kisses the girl and says, "Wo ai ni", so you realize "ai" likely means "to love." Or when people are about to fall off a cliff they always say, "Chu wo", so you figure "chu" means "to help." As you put more pieces together, grammar begins to emerge. Finally, s_allard and ari, I don't believe my methodology is "best" and I agree that my learning would get a boost from a little formal study (and certainly from a lot of conversation classes with corrections). However, as rdearman recalls, this is in fact an experiment, and, though I’m working hard to prove the viability of the method, to the extent that it is shown not to be viable or efficient, I hope that result will also provide a contribution to the understanding of language acquisition, however small. Edited by victorhart on 18 December 2014 at 1:57am 1 person has voted this message useful | |||
| victorhart Bilingual Tetraglot Groupie United States mandarinexperiment.o Joined 3489 days ago 66 posts - 155 votes Speaks: English*, Portuguese*, Spanish, French Studies: Mandarin | Message 142 of 170 08 January 2015 at 5:17am | IP Logged | ||
|
I have reached 240 hours of Mandarin movies and shows after nearly a year of my
experiment. I have assessed that I now understand about 8% of word occurrences on first viewing of an unfamiliar show. This is unimpressive because it includes repeats (I understood 29 unique words and 76 total words in 15 minutes of viewing), but represents significant progress, since after 120 hours I estimated less than 3% comprehension. In my latest post, I extrapolate projections from that result and, while acknowledging that doing so is extremely tenuous, conjecture that - my 1st and main hypothesis, that I can learn Mandarin in this way, will prove true - my 2nd hypothesis, that this method is more efficient than traditional, old school methods, may prove false - my 3rd hypothesis, that I will attain an intermediate level of comprehension after 1,200 hours, may prove false More importantly, I'm glad to report that, for me anyway, this method continues to be a lot of fun! Edited by victorhart on 08 January 2015 at 6:09am 2 persons have voted this message useful | |||
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5212 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish | Message 143 of 170 08 January 2015 at 2:53pm | IP Logged | ||
|
As I contemplate the reported results of this experiment so far, things seem to fall in line with what
can be expected. I think it should be emphasized that the experiment does not consist of watching only movies in Mandarin without subtitles. In its current form this experiment has three components: the movies in Mandarin, subtitles in English that will eventually decrease in use, and a Mandarin learning video Qiao Hu aimed at children. From what I gather this last component is the key to picking up new words that can be recognized in the full-speed videos aimed at adults. In its current form, this experiment can work, unlike what seemed to be the original idea of looking only at movies in Mandarin with no subtitles. Can one learn to understand spoken Mandarin using the method of this modified experiment? I think so, although I believe that progress will be extremely slow. In that sense I consider this method very inefficient. There is a debate to be had, but not now, on how one can calculate understanding a language, as opposed to recognizing words. I have argued at great length elsewhere here at HTLAL that we tend to confuse counting words we recognize with actual complete understanding. For example, I don't see how one can comprehend 10% of a text. But one can certainly recognize 10% of the words. A more recent version of that debate will have to wait. That said, this can be a very enjoyable way of passing time with one's family. As a means of reinforcing family bonding and values, this can be a great experiment. As a means of learning Mandarin however, it is, in my opinion, much too slow when compared with other methods that are readily available. Edited by s_allard on 09 January 2015 at 3:00am 1 person has voted this message useful | |||
| rdearman Senior Member United Kingdom rdearman.orgRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 5018 days ago 881 posts - 1812 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Italian, French, Mandarin | Message 144 of 170 08 January 2015 at 8:58pm | IP Logged | ||
|
As an experiment I think this trial is good, but there are some problems if your attempting to make it a controlled experiment.
- Lack of a control group, you can't compare yourself against others using other methods. - Not statistically significant. You only have a dataset of 1. So what you have here is a natural experiment. A natural experiment is also called a quasi-experiment. A natural experiment involves making a prediction or forming a hypothesis and then gathering data by observing a system. The variables are not controlled in a natural experiment. So you have a valid experiment, but of course as you point out you'd learn faster using more methods. However what I find interesting about this is how it might work as a gauge of this portion of language learning. It would be nice if we could find some way to break down the typical methods of language learning; immersion, course-books, native material (films), native materials (books) to find out how long it would take a person using only those methods to reach a B2 level, as compared to people using all of the methods combined. Is it (as I suspect) the sum is greater than the whole? Would someone with combined resources would move faster than someone else. It would also give some indication of which method might be the one to concentrate on. Films, books, course-work, etc, one of which might prove more effective than others. Of course you'd need a much larger dataset than just you doing it. :) 1 person has voted this message useful |
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
