Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Bull you believed starting out

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
94 messages over 12 pages: 1 24 5 6 7 ... 3 ... 11 12 Next >>
Retinend
Triglot
Senior Member
SpainRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4068 days ago

283 posts - 557 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish
Studies: Arabic (Written), French

 
 Message 17 of 94
20 June 2015 at 2:22pm | IP Logged 
Re the above poster, I'd like to qualify my last post because I totally agree with her.

By alluding to
Retinend wrote:
the more
disheartening truth that every chunk of language in your L1 has a translation that must
be learned and integrated.

I didn't mean literally one and only one response, but rather that in non-digital way,
for every shade of meaning that you are capable of expressing as a native speaker of a
language, equivalent shades of meaning in your L2 must be relearned.    

But it's also right, as the above poster intimates, to say that your strategies for
dealing with this disheartening fact are quite limited at a higher levels. You can do
exercises until you grow old or you can just integrate your life into the language
culture and learn to forget about perfectionism. But this is a more general truth: fake
it til you make it.
4 persons have voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6357 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 18 of 94
20 June 2015 at 8:09pm | IP Logged 
soclydeza85 wrote:
That only children can learn, or are better at learning foreign languages. I feel like it's almost a catch phrase that people say anytime language learning is brought up (by non-language learners). I don't know why, but it really peeves me.

Gunnemark's book even mentions that kids' abilities "decline" at around 12, and for boys this lasts until 16 whereas for girls until 20. I still love the book but now this part makes me WTF both as a feminist and language learner. I don't think I ever truly believed this but I didn't explicitly challenge that either, even in my mind, so maybe this nonsense has affected me at 18-20.

edit: he did point out that this still implies a fairly high level of ability/talent, and that many girls who started French before 20 can still develop a near-native pronunciation. Hm, maybe this is where my anxiety with waiting for the perfect moment came from. I would love to have a perfect pronunciation in Portuguese and Italian, so I was reluctant to start before I knew I could put in my best effort. For Portuguese, I ended up taking about a month of (regular) classes for that reason... and in Italian I mostly got over this fear when I started watching lots of football. But I still felt far less self-conscious about Spanish because I don't love it the same way, and since it's also more similar to Portuguese, I reached "basic fluency" sooner.
Wow, how much a random remark from a respectable person can affect you, even if you don't think much about it.

Edited by Serpent on 20 June 2015 at 8:24pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



numerodix
Trilingual Hexaglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
Joined 6543 days ago

856 posts - 1226 votes 
Speaks: EnglishC2*, Norwegian*, Polish*, Italian, Dutch, French
Studies: Portuguese, Mandarin

 
 Message 19 of 94
20 June 2015 at 9:39pm | IP Logged 
Lots of good answers in this thread!

Some of mine:

- I thought the goal of language study was actually reaching perfection, not making any
mistakes and being erudite. It turns out that it's actually about communicating, often so
so imperfectly, with whomever is there at the time. I can't believe how many years it took
me to learn this, and how I still haven't fully absorbed it.

- I thought everyone was on the constant lookout for my mistakes and would notice every
single little thing. And therefore it made good sense to obsess about and plan out every
sentence in my head before speaking it, to make sure it would come out correct. It turns
out that the people we call native speakers make mistakes in their own language all the
time, or speak naturally using "incorrect" constructions and don't remotely care one way or
the other. As long as they can understand me at all they tend to be content.

- I thought all the effort into studying a language went into learning it in the first
place, and achieving proficiency. It turns out that your languages begin to erode if you
don't use them and it takes a strategy to maintain them all.
9 persons have voted this message useful



Juаn
Senior Member
Colombia
Joined 5105 days ago

727 posts - 1830 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*

 
 Message 20 of 94
22 June 2015 at 2:02am | IP Logged 
It turns out my ideas regarding language learning haven't been wrong. From my experience at least:

* You can easily learn 15 languages once you get the hang of it (and can devote 5-6 hours a day to them).

* Production early on is a waste of time. In fact, production before you are passively fully proficient is a waste of time.

* Listening (other than perfunctorily) to radio or TV before your vocabulary is large enough to enable you to understand most of it is also a waste of time.

* You acquire a language through reading semantically meaningful texts of increasing difficulty and complexity while looking up unknown words (with the aid of ancillary grammatical explanations early on). And that's it; there is nothing else to learning a language. Anything other than this is -you guessed it- a waste of time.

* If I had no other interests and could devote 9 hours a day to studying languages (no less but no more either than a regular full-time job), I have no doubt I could learn 40 or 50 languages to a very high level before I died.
6 persons have voted this message useful



Arthaey
Groupie
United States
arthaey.com
Joined 4806 days ago

97 posts - 155 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 21 of 94
22 June 2015 at 2:58am | IP Logged 
Juаn wrote:
You can easily learn 15 languages once you get the hang of it (and can devote 5-6 hours a day to them).


While I don't disagree with the intent of your statement, I do take issue with calling "5-6 hours a day" "easy". ;)
3 persons have voted this message useful



Juаn
Senior Member
Colombia
Joined 5105 days ago

727 posts - 1830 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*

 
 Message 22 of 94
22 June 2015 at 3:47am | IP Logged 
Arthaey wrote:
Juаn wrote:
You can easily learn 15 languages once you get the hang of it (and can devote 5-6 hours a day to them).


While I don't disagree with the intent of your statement, I do take issue with calling "5-6 hours a day" "easy". ;)


Well, think of the number of people who go through 3-5 hours per week or more of language instruction in school in a single language, and who get absolutely nowhere after many years of it.

The point being, once you are able to hone your language learning skills, doing so becomes "easy", at least relatively speaking.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6357 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 23 of 94
22 June 2015 at 12:40pm | IP Logged 
Juаn wrote:
In fact, production before you are passively fully proficient is a waste of time.

I'd say you can't be fully proficient without some minimal active skills. To appreciate the style, you need to notice the choices the author made, to know what other words/expressions/structures could be used instead.
Specifically, I don't think you can be a passive B2 without being at about A2 actively, or a passive C1 without being B1. Whether you actually need to practise the active skills, appears to depend on the person. I just sort of create a model in my mind, but others seem to need this practice, for example tarvos.

Quote:
Listening (other than perfunctorily) to radio or TV before your vocabulary is large enough to enable you to understand most of it is also a waste of time.

Doesn't apply to related languages. And of course there's LR too.
With an understanding of linguistics, even a distantly related language is doable (like English and Polish). Of course this doesn't meant it's the most efficient way.

Edited by Serpent on 22 June 2015 at 12:47pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



garyb
Triglot
Senior Member
ScotlandRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4967 days ago

1468 posts - 2413 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian, French
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 24 of 94
22 June 2015 at 1:03pm | IP Logged 
Juаn wrote:
It turns out my ideas regarding language learning haven't been wrong.


Missing the point of the thread then, there are enough other threads for people to push their thoughts on the best learning strategies.

Another one I didn't think of in my first reply was that I believed that my pronunciation and accent would simply improve naturally as my level in the language improved and I did more listening. Nope.


6 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 94 messages over 12 pages: << Prev 1 24 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.7344 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.