Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Northern European Learning Methods?

 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
32 messages over 4 pages: 1 24  Next >>


jeff_lindqvist
Diglot
Moderator
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6669 days ago

4250 posts - 5710 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 17 of 32
28 March 2008 at 3:44pm | IP Logged 
I agree with raeve and badger2. When I have met people from Germany, Spain and France my experience has been that they usually have a very thick accent and that they usually comment on mine (suggestions: American, Irish or Canadian, depending on where I've been at the moment).

In Sweden (and other countries of course) we actually get to hear (a variety of) spoken English, as opposed to what I believe is the case in the abovementioned countries (considering the dubbing and all that).
1 person has voted this message useful



Leopejo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Italy
Joined 5869 days ago

675 posts - 724 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, Finnish*, English
Studies: French, Russian

 
 Message 18 of 32
28 March 2008 at 3:59pm | IP Logged 
jeff_lindqvist wrote:
I agree with raeve and badger2. When I have met people from Germany, Spain and France my experience has been that they usually have a very thick accent and that they usually comment on mine (suggestions: American, Irish or Canadian, depending on where I've been at the moment).

In Sweden (and other countries of course) we actually get to hear (a variety of) spoken English, as opposed to what I believe is the case in the abovementioned countries (considering the dubbing and all that).

Dubbing, and the importance of the national language, are the two most important factors in my opinion. And it is a kind of vicious circle: no exposure to it -> less knowledge of it -> less desire or possibility to learn it -> less exposure to it...

It is a fact that in Italy most people learn English in school only. And some don't learn it at all: at least some years ago, a minority had to learn French instead.
1 person has voted this message useful



Eriol
Diglot
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 6626 days ago

118 posts - 130 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: Portuguese

 
 Message 19 of 32
28 March 2008 at 4:42pm | IP Logged 
frenkeld wrote:

I would also check the total number of hours of English instruction in those countries by the time a person graduates from High School.


Since you implicitly asked I tried to check the total number of English instruction hours in Swedish schools.

Compulsory school, grade 1-9: 480 hours that are guaranteed for all pupils. I started English in grade 3, but I'm not sure what grade they start in nowadays.

High school, grade 10-12: 100-300 hours. English is divided into three courses of 100 hours each. Normally students on more practical programs only do one course, students on theoretical programs do two and only students who choose to or are on special "international" programs do all three. I'm not sure if all these hours are guaranteed, but the numbers should be approximately right.

So in total we are looking at hours similar to what an FSI-course in English for Swedish-speakers would be if it existed...
1 person has voted this message useful



JD
Diglot
Newbie
Sweden
Joined 5926 days ago

36 posts - 37 votes
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Finnish, French

 
 Message 20 of 32
28 March 2008 at 6:00pm | IP Logged 
Yes, the facts that we don't dub our television shows and that we start out with English early are the most important factors. We hear it all the time and it is very easy to get at least a passive knowledge of the language.

From my experience, most peoples grammar and vocabulary are very good over here, but I'm not so sure about the accent. While Germans and Spaniards are often mentioned in these debates, and while they do have a thick accent at times, that is definitely also the case with Swedes. I hear many people speaking with a thick "sing-song" Swedish accent (Sven-Göran Eriksson, anyone?) but I don't hear it commented very much. Is there any particular reason behind that? One theory I could think about myself is perhaps that the Swedish/Norwegian accent is quite clear and comprehensible, so it doesn't "bother" the other speaker that much, even though it's strong. Input from native speakers is welcomed!
1 person has voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6703 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 21 of 32
28 March 2008 at 6:28pm | IP Logged 
frenkeld wrote:
I would also check the total number of hours of English instruction in those countries by the time a person graduates from High School.

Ra wrote:
I remember having anything from 2 to 4, maybe 5, hours a week, starting at age 7. And now they are starting English instruction at age 5 or 6.

I do think however, that the influence of anglophone culture (cinema, TV, videogames and music primarily) is the most important factor.

Eriol wrote:
I tried to check the total number of English instruction hours in Swedish schools.

Compulsory school, grade 1-9: 480 hours that are guaranteed for all pupils. I started English in grade 3, but I'm not sure what grade they start in nowadays.

High school, grade 10-12: 100-300 hours. English is divided into three courses of 100 hours each. Normally students on more practical programs only do one course, students on theoretical programs do two and only students who choose to or are on special "international" programs do all three. I'm not sure if all these hours are guaranteed, but the numbers should be approximately right.

So in total we are looking at hours similar to what an FSI-course in English for Swedish-speakers would be if it existed...


Ra and Eriol, thanks for sharing the Norwegian and Swedish data on the teaching hours for English.

I suspect that while "the influence of anglophone culture (cinema, TV, videogames and music primarily)" is indeed very important in this case, one may not know whether it is "the most important factor". Perhaps it is, but schooling may still be very important.

If one could conduct experiments, one would want to have a society with the same amount of exposure to English-speaking media, but no school instruction in English, and another one with significant school instruction in English, but little access to the English-speaking media. What would the results be in these two cases?

Well, in some sense, I was the subject of an experiment of the second kind myself, and the results were reasonable. I am old enough to have studied English in the former Soviet Union. Schooling there was 10 grades, with foreign language normally taught in 5th through 10th grades, at something like 2 in-class hours per week. There were also magnet schools for English, where English classes were from 2nd through 10th grades, with an additional weekly lesson. I'll guesstimate their weekly hours of English instruction at 3 hours per week. Access to Western media was extremely limited - all this was before the VHS and DVD eras.

As far as I know, both school systems used more or less the same dull and unimaginative language-learning methodology, the only real difference in magnet schools was starting earlier and a little over two times as many total hours of instruction by the time one graduated. It made a huge difference - people from regular schools pretty much didn't know the language they had studied, those from magnet schools knew it much better.

A famous Hungarian polyglot Kato Lomb discussed a similar difference she had observed between regular and magnet schools in Hungary in the 1973 edition of her book on language learning, and her guess was the same, that some of it had to do with the total number of hours of instruction.

Essentially, regular school provide, roughly speaking, 300 hours of instruction instead of the needed 600 - in self-study the difference in the results would be self-evident, and school-based learning seems to be no exception. The Scandinavian educational systems do seem to provide the needed number of hours, so this may also play an important role, in addition to the availability of the English-language media.


Edited by frenkeld on 30 March 2008 at 10:29pm

1 person has voted this message useful





jeff_lindqvist
Diglot
Moderator
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6669 days ago

4250 posts - 5710 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 22 of 32
28 March 2008 at 6:32pm | IP Logged 
Very true, I wouldn't say that most Swedes (or even a decent part) have a good accent, only that they (we?) do exist. :) Basically every official person (politician, singer et.c.) have a clear Swedish accent, and it's a strange feeling hearing people of my own age speaking English like the character Stig Helmer Olsson from the "Sällskapsresan" movies (it's the fourth part that takes place in Scotland right?).

I've never thought of what you say about the Swedish/Norwegian accent (i.e. being somewhat "neutral", perhaps not bothering people). For one, Scandinavians usually get the sounds right.
1 person has voted this message useful



JD
Diglot
Newbie
Sweden
Joined 5926 days ago

36 posts - 37 votes
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Finnish, French

 
 Message 23 of 32
28 March 2008 at 7:38pm | IP Logged 
jeff_lindqvist wrote:

I've never thought of what you say about the Swedish/Norwegian accent (i.e. being somewhat "neutral", perhaps not bothering people). For one, Scandinavians usually get the sounds right.


Yeah, that was sort of what I was thinking of as well. We get the sounds right and pronounce the words correctly, but still with a strong Swedish accent IMO.

About they being "neutral"; it's difficult to tell for me being a native speaker since our accent is the one that seems "clear" and "natural" to me. But is it just what we are used to or does it exist a more objective "clearness" when it comes to languages?

jeff_lindqvist wrote:
(it's the fourth part that takes place in Scotland right?).

Yes, you're thinking of the fourth one, "Den ofrivillige golfaren" ("It's pronounced "Steeg Helmer"...") ;).

Edited by JD on 28 March 2008 at 7:38pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Earle
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6075 days ago

276 posts - 276 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Norwegian, Spanish

 
 Message 24 of 32
28 March 2008 at 8:21pm | IP Logged 
Quote:
Input from native speakers is welcomed!


I think that it's accurate that most American English speakers do not find the Svensk/Norsk accent bothersome. On the contrary, it's quite charming. It's been fodder for comedians over here for generations. It still is on Garrison Keillor's "Prairie Home Companion." I find that, when speaking Norwegian, I have to think about it to reproduce it. I usually abandon it after a while and just speak normally, for me as an English/German speaker. Then, I'm told that I'm speaking Norwegian with a Danish accent. :)


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 32 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 1 24  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3750 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.