Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Question about the L-R method

 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies Post Reply
89 messages over 12 pages: 1 2 3 46 7 ... 5 ... 11 12 Next >>
kidshomestunner
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6413 days ago

239 posts - 285 votes 
Speaks: Japanese

 
 Message 33 of 89
11 July 2010 at 8:58pm | IP Logged 
Volte wrote:
kidshomestunner wrote:

I think just using one method is ridiculous, it is not the strategy but the fighting that is important. To use many methods is the road to success, I know that and it needs to be stated more. To many people just hero worship one method and don't think outside the box.


... We're talking about learning a few handfuls of symbols. There are many ways to do that, but it certainly doesn't require any given person to use multiple approaches.


Multiple approaches would help to learn Russian letters:

For example you could

learn п is pronounced p by associating it with pi which it of course looks suspiciously like

Learn m,t,k by saying they are basically read like English letters

д could be remembered as "D" as it looks like a capital "D"

and so on

Attacking a fort from many different angles is better than just one...
1 person has voted this message useful



Ocius
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5598 days ago

48 posts - 77 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Ancient Greek
Studies: French, Latin, Sanskrit

 
 Message 34 of 89
11 July 2010 at 11:13pm | IP Logged 
kidshomestunner wrote:
Volte wrote:
kidshomestunner wrote:

I think just using one method is ridiculous, it is not the strategy but the fighting that is important. To use many
methods is the road to success, I know that and it needs to be stated more. To many people just hero worship
one method and don't think outside the box.


... We're talking about learning a few handfuls of symbols. There are many ways to do that, but it certainly doesn't
require any given person to use multiple approaches.


Multiple approaches would help to learn Russian letters:

For example you could

learn п is pronounced p by associating it with pi which it of course looks suspiciously like

Learn m,t,k by saying they are basically read like English letters

д could be remembered as "D" as it looks like a capital "D"

and so on

Attacking a fort from many different angles is better than just one...


Everyone here knows there are many ways to learn a language (or simply an alphabet). But you're posting in a
thread titled "Questions about the L-R method". Why are you determined to bring up something completely
irrelevant to the use of L-R here?

Edited by Ocius on 11 July 2010 at 11:13pm

1 person has voted this message useful



ALS
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5812 days ago

104 posts - 131 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Norwegian, Finnish, Russian

 
 Message 35 of 89
12 July 2010 at 12:10am | IP Logged 
kidshomestunner wrote:
Volte wrote:
kidshomestunner wrote:

I think just using one method is ridiculous, it is not the strategy but the fighting that is important. To use many methods is the road to success, I know that and it needs to be stated more. To many people just hero worship one method and don't think outside the box.


... We're talking about learning a few handfuls of symbols. There are many ways to do that, but it certainly doesn't require any given person to use multiple approaches.


Multiple approaches would help to learn Russian letters:

For example you could

learn п is pronounced p by associating it with pi which it of course looks suspiciously like

Learn m,t,k by saying they are basically read like English letters

д could be remembered as "D" as it looks like a capital "D"

and so on

Attacking a fort from many different angles is better than just one...


I learned Russian Cyrillic by rote memorization and flash cards, but apparently I did it wrong and have to spend hours of my time drilling it in other ways or I didn't actually learn it and my ability to read Russian is fake.

Not sure what you're desperately trying to do here other than derail the thread.
4 persons have voted this message useful



kidshomestunner
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6413 days ago

239 posts - 285 votes 
Speaks: Japanese

 
 Message 36 of 89
12 July 2010 at 4:32pm | IP Logged 
I am just saying that in my experience too many people, including me get bogged down in one method and can't think outside of the box. I am just saying that in my experience that this tends to be too common an occurence.
1 person has voted this message useful



Bao
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
tinyurl.com/pe4kqe5
Joined 5774 days ago

2256 posts - 4046 votes 
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Japanese, Mandarin

 
 Message 37 of 89
12 July 2010 at 6:57pm | IP Logged 
kidshomestunner wrote:
You mean the Russian Alphabet. Russian is an offshoot of are Cyrillic alphabet. The Bulgarian alphabet and others are also called 'cyrillic' but are different to Russsian.

The Spanish, French, Swedish, German, Polish, Icelandic alphabet also are different from the English one, yet they are all called Latin alphabet. It might have something to do with history, as the Latin alphabet was used to first write Church Latin in most of western and northern Europe, whereas Cyrillic was used to write Old Church Slavonic in the eastern areas, and either alphabet was adopted by secular writers to write their own language (to simplify the process). Of course it would be technically correct to say 'the Cyrillic alphabet as used in Russia' but don't you agree that most people could infer that from the usage of Russian and Cyrillic alphabet in the same sentence? :)

I know that was keeping the off topic alive, but it bothered me.

I personally do not learn well with a mnemonic based approach like you suggested for learning a foreign alphabet. It might very well be that I implement mnemonics, but not consciously - I tried it and it takes more effort than simple rote memorization (which I also do not like very much.)
What for me is important is not that I can link бог to god, but that бог becomes god, just, you know, when it is surrounded by other Russian words.
My own experience tells me that listening/reading L2-L2 is the best I can do to link sounds I understand and their visual representation until they become second nature. I'm not sure yet how well L2-L1 works for me to do the same for sounds and their meaning and grammatical function.
5 persons have voted this message useful



patuco
Diglot
Moderator
Gibraltar
Joined 7023 days ago

3795 posts - 4268 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 38 of 89
12 July 2010 at 10:50pm | IP Logged 
Now that the discussion on the different alphabets in use in numerous european countries appears to be over, lets return to the topic at hand and refrain from any more off-topic comments. If anyone wishes to continue the "alphabet discussion", please feel free to open a new thread. Any further derailments of this thread will be deleted. Thanks.
4 persons have voted this message useful



GREGORG4000
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5531 days ago

307 posts - 479 votes 
Speaks: English*, Finnish
Studies: Japanese, Korean, Amharic, French

 
 Message 39 of 89
13 July 2010 at 4:49pm | IP Logged 
Hmm, I've L2-R1ed about 30 hours of Finnish so far, and now I can understand 30% to 100% of sentences, depending on the subject and style of the writing. Is it time for me to switch to L2-R2 now?

Edited by GREGORG4000 on 13 July 2010 at 4:50pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



Volte
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Switzerland
Joined 6447 days ago

4474 posts - 6726 votes 
Speaks: English*, Esperanto, German, Italian
Studies: French, Finnish, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 40 of 89
13 July 2010 at 7:13pm | IP Logged 
GREGORG4000 wrote:
Hmm, I've L2-R1ed about 30 hours of Finnish so far, and now I can understand 30% to 100% of sentences, depending on the subject and style of the writing. Is it time for me to switch to L2-R2 now?


No, assuming that your goal is to learn efficiently.

I was going to point you to the updated version of the L-R summary thread, but I realized it hadn't been posted yet, and didn't actually contain the quote I was thinking of. Nonetheless, it as something about being at that stage, throwing away your English/L1 text, and being a little nonplussed when you couldn't quite believe that the monk was also a lesbian police inspector... L1 is still quite useful at your current level.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 89 messages over 12 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 46 7 8 9 10 11 12  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5313 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.