Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Do alphabets need to be so complicated?

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
115 messages over 15 pages: 1 2 35 6 7 ... 4 ... 14 15 Next >>
John Smith
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 6043 days ago

396 posts - 542 votes 
Speaks: English*, Czech*, Spanish
Studies: German

 
 Message 25 of 115
16 October 2010 at 11:13am | IP Logged 
Wrong?? Lol. Are you telling me that an English speaker cannot read a word, he already knows how to pronounce, the first time he encounters it written down????


English spelling is not as irregular as some tend to think.

For example you could argue that a possible spelling for fish is ghoti. gh=f as in tough, o=i as in women and ti=sh as in nation. No normal person, however, would ever read ghoti as fish!!!

If you know the word and know how to pronounce it you will be able to read the word. No matter how it is spelt.

I m shure that u kann read thys. Did u knowtice the badd speling??? Cann Chineze speakerz do this wen youzing karakters???

It is qiute surpising jsut how mcuh you can do to an Egnlish wrod wtihout mkaing it ileligble.


Cainntear wrote:
Well, alphabets are certainly simpler than ideograms, whether cursive or not. As I've previously said, the advantage of ideograms is really just in terms of written space.

But...
John Smith wrote:
How about the fact that an English speaker can correctly read/pronounce any word he knows already when he sees it written for the first time.

Wrong. If you'd said Spanish, or German, or Russian, you would have been right.  English is a mess.

Superlative is stressed on the second syllable of the prefix, which goes against the norm.

People can never agree how to pronounce some words that were traditionally most encountered in the written form. (Controversy -- commonly first vs second syllable.) In fact, I can't remember the word now, but there was one word that me and my brothers and sisters said consistently wrong for years because it was used in some of the children's novels we had in the house, and when I was about 9 I heard the correct pronunciation on TV finally.

Though, through, bough, cough.


I can't believe people are actually trying to argue that learning how to read Chinese is as difficult as learning how to read English. Are you people for real???



Edited by John Smith on 16 October 2010 at 11:26am

2 persons have voted this message useful



egill
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5697 days ago

418 posts - 791 votes 
Speaks: Mandarin, English*
Studies: German, Spanish, Dutch

 
 Message 26 of 115
16 October 2010 at 11:38am | IP Logged 
John Smith wrote:
I m shure that u kann read thys. Did u knowtice the badd speling???
Cann Chineze speakerz do this wen youzing karakters???

It is qiute surpising jsut how mcuh you can do to an Egnlish wrod wtihout mkaing it
ileligble.


Of course you can. This would be akin to using similar sounding or similar looking
characters—just as in the English example, context and similar overall word shapes would
render it legible.

Edited by egill on 16 October 2010 at 11:40am

4 persons have voted this message useful



Linc
Newbie
Macau
Joined 5443 days ago

29 posts - 45 votes
Studies: English
Studies: French

 
 Message 27 of 115
16 October 2010 at 11:42am | IP Logged 
egill wrote:
John Smith wrote:
I m shure that u kann read thys. Did u knowtice the badd speling???
Cann Chineze speakerz do this wen youzing karakters???

It is qiute surpising jsut how mcuh you can do to an Egnlish wrod wtihout mkaing it
ileligble.


Of course you can. This would be akin to using similar sounding or similar looking
characters—just as in the English example, context and similar overall word shapes would
render it legible.



You must mean the Martian script.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_script
1 person has voted this message useful



John Smith
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 6043 days ago

396 posts - 542 votes 
Speaks: English*, Czech*, Spanish
Studies: German

 
 Message 28 of 115
16 October 2010 at 11:43am | IP Logged 
^^ not just similar sounding and looking. Jumbled up too.


The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, reports that his Chinese colleagues estimate it takes seven to eight years for a Mandarin speaker to learn to read and write three thousand characters

http://pinyin.info/readings/texts/moser.html
1 person has voted this message useful



Old Chemist
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5174 days ago

227 posts - 285 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 29 of 115
16 October 2010 at 12:12pm | IP Logged 
Surely this is true for Chinese too? There must be semi-literate people in China who muddle up ideograms and so make malapropisms or just simple mistakes which most people can read because of the context. It would be interesting to have the input of someone bilingual/diglot in the two languages to comment, as I think we are all philosophizing at the moment - interesting and intelligent comments,probably except for unworthy self!

As a digression can you read this:

Tihs is an eamxlpe of eglsih wirtetn wtih olny the lsat ltrets saytnig in pacle.

If you can read it without struggling then your brain supposedly works faster. This gem of information is buried somewhere on youtube, I think.
1 person has voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5431 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 30 of 115
16 October 2010 at 1:36pm | IP Logged 
Since I've come late to this party and have no knowledge of Chinese, I can't comment on the relative difficulty of English and Chinese writing systems. Two things come to my mind, however. Firstly, in English (and I assume in most alphabetic languages), one can abbreviate words by chopping off certain parts and leaving some sort of recognizable stem. So, we have "am" and "pro" for "amateur" and "professional". Note that we also have "prof" for professor. How does this work in an ideographic system?

The other thing that comes to mind is the increasing importance of SMS or text language in English (and presumably in other languages). As most people know, this is an extreme form of abbreviation or shorthand that replaces entire words or parts of words by single letters that have similar sounds or by acronyms. Thus, 121 "one to one", 4 u "for you", IMO "in my opinion", etc. Again, I would be curious to know how this works in other writing systems.

Edited by s_allard on 16 October 2010 at 1:37pm

1 person has voted this message useful



BiaHuda
Triglot
Groupie
Vietnam
Joined 5364 days ago

97 posts - 127 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Vietnamese
Studies: Cantonese

 
 Message 31 of 115
16 October 2010 at 1:56pm | IP Logged 
China has a 73% literacy rate for what it's worth. In the 1940's it was less than 20%. That says enough for me.
1 person has voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6583 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 32 of 115
16 October 2010 at 2:11pm | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:
Since I've come late to this party and have no knowledge of Chinese, I can't comment on the relative difficulty of English and Chinese writing systems. Two things come to my mind, however. Firstly, in English (and I assume in most alphabetic languages), one can abbreviate words by chopping off certain parts and leaving some sort of recognizable stem. So, we have "am" and "pro" for "amateur" and "professional". Note that we also have "prof" for professor. How does this work in an ideographic system?

Well, the vast majority of Mandarin words consist of one or two characters, so the need for abbreviation is less pressing, but there are interesting parallels. For example, a bus service going from Canton 廣洲 to Foshan 佛山 will use the acronym 廣佛 to describe the route. Most country and Chinese city names can be abbreviated to one character in contexts were the context makes it evident. Some longer words of things like diseases can also be abbreviated to two characters. For example "influenza" in Mandarin is "流行性感冒", but just as it's often shortened to "the flu" in English, it's shortened to "流感" in Mandarin. There's also, especially in places where traditional characters are used, the phenomenon of using characters with less strokes, especially when writing by hand. For example, "wonton noodles" (a kind of noodle dish common in Hong Kong) should be written as "餛飩麵", but is commonly seen written as "雲吞麵". Hell, some people might even replace the "麵" with "面". That's what the Chinese government did when they simplified the script.

Quote:
The other thing that comes to mind is the increasing importance of SMS or text language in English (and presumably in other languages). As most people know, this is an extreme form of abbreviation or shorthand that replaces entire words or parts of words by single letters that have similar sounds or by acronyms. Thus, 121 "one to one", 4 u "for you", IMO "in my opinion", etc. Again, I would be curious to know how this works in other writing systems.

In Cantonese, many characters can be replaced by Latin letterforms when it comes to SMS. "啲" can be written as "D", for example. Hong Kong Cantonese is also ripe with English loanwords, and some of those are shortened, like "fd" for "friend".


4 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 115 messages over 15 pages: << Prev 1 2 35 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3438 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.